Abstract
• Background: The aim was to elucidate two controversial questions. (1) is the pulsatile inflow dominant or is there a sizeable steady inflow component? (2) Is the outflow of blood steady or pulsatile in induced and in glaucomatous hypertension? • Methods: The OBF system (Langham) was used for pulse recording. A simple electric flow model was conceived and analysed in terms of Fourier series, using linear circuit theory. • Results and conclusions: Possible explanations of the seemingly inconsistent observations are indicated by the model. (1) A steady inflow of similar magnitude to the pulsatile one is predicted. The total flow can be determined at present theoretically from recordings of the pulsatile inflow and of the systolic and diastolic intraocular blood pressure. Some methodological improvements are desirable in order to obtain reliable estimates in practice. (2) The outflow is normally steady, probably even in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. In hypertension induced with the suction cup this may be doubted. The eye has similarities with the device called the Starling resistor which describes the behaviour of collapsible vessels. Acute pressure increase (plus the pulsations of the IOP) may put the collapsible vessels into a state which disturbs the steady outflow. The effects of changes in IOP and in other components on the size and shape of the flow curve are demonstrated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Langham M, Farrell R, O'Brian V, Silver D, Schilder P (1989) Non-invasive measurements of pulsatile blood flow in the human eye. In: Ocular blood flow in glaucoma. Kugler & Ghedini, Amsterdam, pp 93–99
Krakau CET (1992) Calculation of the pulsatile ocular blood flow. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33:2754–2756
Perkins ES (1981) The ocular pulse. Curr Eye Res 1:19–23
Friedenwald JS (1937) Contribution to the theory and practice of tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 20:985–1024
Ytteborg J (1960) The role of intraocular blood volume in rigidity measurements on human eyes. Acta Ophthalmol 38:410–436
Eisenlohr JE, Langham ME, Maumenee AE (1962) Manometric studies of the pressure-volume relationship in living and enucleated eyes of individual human subjects. Br J Ophthalmol 46:536–548
Patel DJ, Vaishnav RN (eds) (1980) Basic hemodynamics. University Park Press, Baltimore
Brown BM (1965) The mathematical theory of linear systems. Chapman & Hall, London
Weigelin EA, Lobstein A (1962) Ophthalmodynamometrie. Karger, Basel
McDonald DA (1960) Blood flow in arteries. Arnold, London
Aaslid E (ed) (1986) Transcranial Doppler sonography. Springer, Vienna New York
Langham ME, To'mey KF (1978) A clinical procedure for the measurement of ocular pulse pressure relationship and the ophthalmic arterial pressure. Exp Eye Res 27:17–25
Baxter GM, Williamson TH, McKillop G, Dutton GN (1992) Color Doppler ultrasound of orbital and optic nerve blood flow. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33:604–610
Feke G, Tagawa H, Deupree D, Douglas G, Sebag J, Welter J (1989) Blood flow in the normal human retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30:58–65
Hörven I (1970) Dynamic tonometry. III. The corneal indentation pulse in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 48:39–58
Bynke H (1968) Influence of the intraocular pressure on the amplitude of the corneal pulse. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 46:1133–1145
Fry DL, Thomas LS, Greenfield JC (1980) Flow in collapsible vessels. In: Patel DJ, Vaishnav RN (eds) Basic hemodynamics. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 407–424
Moses RA (1963) Hydrodynamic model eye. Ophthalmologica 146:137–142
Badeer HS, Hicks JW (1992) Hemodynamics of vascular “waterfall”: is the analogy justified? Respir Physiol 87:205–217
Laqueur X (1877) and Ulrich Y (1880), cited in: Duke Elder (1946) Textbook of ophthalmology, vol I. Kimpton, London
Best M, Rogers R (1974) Techniques of ocular pulse analysis in carotid stenosis. Arch Ophthalmol 92:54–58
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krakau, C.E.T. A model for pulsatile and steady ocular blood flow. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 233, 112–118 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00241481
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00241481