Abstract
When vertical body position is simulated, conventional differential pressure valves show an absolutely unphysiological flow, which is 2–170 times the normal liquor production rate. Although this is compensated in part by the resistance of the silicon tubes, which may produce up to 94% of the resistance of the complete shunt system, a negative intracranial pressure (ICP) of up to 30–44 cmH2O is an unavoidable consequence, which can be followed by subdural hematomas, slit ventricles, and other well-known complications. Modern shunt technology offers programmable, hydrostatic, and “flow-controlled” valves and anti-siphon devices; we have tested 13 different designs from 7 manufacturers (56 specimens), using the “Heidelberg Valve Test Inventory” with 16 subtests. “Programmable” valves reduce, but cannot exclude, unphysiological flow rates: even in the highest position and in combination with a standard catheter typical programmable Medos-Hakim valves allow a flow of 93–232 ml/h, Sophy SU-8-valves 86–168 ml/h with 30 cmH2O. The effect of hydrostatic valves (Hakim-Lumbar, Chhabra) can be inactivated by movements of daily life. The weight of the metal balls in most valves was too low for adequate flow reduction. Antisiphon devices are highly dependent on external, i.e. subcutaneous, pressure which has unpredictable influences on shunt function, and clinically is sometimes followed by shunt insufficiency. Two new Orbis-Sigma valves showed relatively physiological flow rates even when the vertical position (30 cmH2O) was simulated. One showed an insufficient flow (5.7 ml/h), and one was primarily obstructed. These have by far the smallest outlet of all valves. Additionally, the ruby pin tends to stick. Therefore, a high susceptibility to obliterations and blockade is unavoidable. Encouraging results obtained in pediatric patients contrast with disappointing experiences in some German and Swedish hospitals, which suggests that our laboratory findings are confirmed by clinical results. The concept of strict flow limitation seems to be inadaequate for adult patients, who need a relatively high flow during (nocturnal) ICP crises. The problem of shunt overdrainage remains unsolved.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abe H, Chiba Y, Tokoro K (1991) Effect of anti-siphon device in shunting procedure: intraventricular pressure during posture changes. In: Matsumoto S, Tamaki N (eds) Hydrocephalus. Pathogenesis and treatment. Springer, Tokyo Berlin Heidelberg pp 391–398
American Society for Testing and Materials (1989) Standard practice for evaluating and specifying implantable shunt assemblies for neurosurgical application. Designation F 647–679
Aschoff A (1994) In-vitro-Testung von Hydrocephalus-Ventilen. Thesis, University of Heidelberg
Aschoff, A, Osterloh M, Kunze S (1990) Longtime tests of 30 hydrocephalus valves (abstract). Child's Nerv Syst 6: 282
Aschoff A, Kremer P, Benesch C, Klank A, Kunze S (1991) Shunt technology and overdrainage. A critical review of hydrostatic, programmable and variable-resistance valves and flowreducing devices. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1 [Suppl 1]: 49–50
Benesch C, Aschoff A (1992) Hydrocephalus treatment with the programmable Medos-Hakim valve: laboratory testing and clinical experiences with 70 implantations. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2 [Suppl 1]:45
Castillo M, Hudgins PA, Malko JA, Burrow BK, Hoffmann JC (1991) Flow-sensitive MR imaging of ventriculoperitoneal shunts: in vitro findings, clinical applications, and pitfalls. AJN 12:667–674
Chapman PH, (1990) Optimum position of the antisiphon device (letter). Neurosurgery 27:333
Chapman PH, Cosman ER, Arnold MA (1990) The relationship between ventricular fluid pressure and body position in normal subjects and subjects with shunt: a telemetric study. Neurosurgery 26: 181–189
Chervu, S, Chervu LR, Vallabhajosyula B, Milstein DM, Shapiro KM, Shulman K, Blaufox MD (1984) Quantitative evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid shunt flow. J Nucl Med 25:91–95
Chiba Y, Yuda K (1980) Thermosensitive determinatof CSF shunt patency with a pair of small disc thermistors. J Neurosurg 52: 700–704
Chiba, Y, Tokoro K, Abe H (1991) Importance of anti-siphon devices in shunt therapy of pediatric and adolescent hydrocephalus. In: Matsumoto S, Tamaki N (eds) Hydrocephalus. Pathogenesis and treatment. Springer, Tokyo Berlin Heidelberg, pp 375–382
Cinalli G, Sainte-Rose C, Pierre-Kahn A, Renier D, Hoppe-Hirsch E, Hirsch JF (1993) Analysis of a pediatric series of 523 hydrocephalic patients treated with a CSF flow regulating device (abstract). Child's Nerv Syst 9:52
Da Silva MC, Drake JM (1990–1991) Effect of subcutaneous implantation on anti-siphon device function. Pediatr Neurosurg 16:197–202
Dautheribes M, Liguoro D, San Galli F, Kerdiles C, Guerin J (1993) Programmable shunting hydrocephalus in various etiologies: a series of 28 cases (abstract). Child's Nerv Syst 9:59
Dietrich U, Lumenta C, Sprick C, Majewski B (1987) Subdural hematoma in a case of hydrocephalus and macrocrania. Experience with a pressure-adjustable valve. Child's Nerv Syst 3:242–243
Ekstedt J, Friden H (1980) Hydrodynamic properties of CSF shunt systems. In: Shulman K, Marmarou A, Miller JD, Becker DP, Hochwald GM, Brock M (eds) Intracranial pressure IV. Springer, Berlin Vienna New York, pp 483–485
Faulhaber K, Schmitz P (1978) Overdrainage phenomena in shunt treated hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir 45:89–101
Foltz EL, Blanks J, Meyer R (1993) Shunted hydrocephalus: normal upright ICP by CSF gravity-flow control. Surg Neurol 39:210–217
Fox JD, Portnoy HD, Shulte RR (1973) Cerebrospinal fluid shunts: an experimental evaluation of flow rates and pressure values in the anti-siphon valve. Surg Neurol 1:299–302
Fox JL (1984) Anti-siphon device in shunt therapy (letter). J Neurosurg 61: 1157–1158
Genitori L, Lena G, Erdincler P, Tavares de Lima F, Achouri M, Choux M (1992) Mechanical and functional complications in shunts. A series of 1244 children and 2845 operations (abstract). Child's Nerv Syst 9:52
Gruber R, Jenny P, Herzog B (1984) Experiences with the antisiphon-device (ASD) in shunt therapy of pediatric hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 61:156–162
Hakim S (1973) Hydraulic and mechanical miss-matching of valve shunts used in the treatment of hydrocephalus: the need for a servo-valve shunt. Dev Med Child Neurol 15:646–653
Hakim S, Duran de la Roche F, Burton JD (1973) A critical analysis of valve shunts used in the treatment of hydrocephalus. Dev Med Child Neurol 15:230–255
Hara M, Kadowski C, Konishi Y (1983) A new, method for measuring CSF flow in shunts. J Neurosurg 58:557–561
Hashimoto T, Nakamura N, Kanki T, Shimazu H, Yamakoshi K, Gondoh M, Tamai T (1991) A new shunt system with non-invasive flow rate regulation and pressure measurement. In: Matsumoto S, Tamaki N (eds) Hydrocephalus. Pathogenesis and treatment. Springer, Tokyo Berlin Heidelberg, pp 422–431
Horton DD, Williams G, Pollay M (1991) The effectiveness of a siphon control device in preventing the complications of overshunting. In: Matsumoto S, Tamaki T (eds) Hydrocephalus. Pathogenesis and treatment. Springer, Tokyo Berlin Heidelberg, pp 370–374
Janneck C, Blaschke H (1983) Klmische Bewertung variierender Liquordrainagesysteme bei konnataler wie erworbener Hydrocephalie. In: Voth D, Gutjahr P, Glees P (eds) Hydrocephalus im frühen Kindesalter. Enke, Stuttgart, pp 199–203
Jaskoska E, MacKinnon AE (1988) Experience with antisiphon devices: successes and complications. Z Kinderchir 43:22–23
Jones RFC, Teo C, Currie B, Kwok BCT, Nayanar VV (1991) The Antisiphon device: its value in preventing excessive drainage. In: Matsumoto S, Tamaki N (eds) Hydrocephalus. Pathogenesis and treatment. Springer, Tokyo Berlin Heidelberg, pp 383–390
Kadowaki C, Hara M, Numoto M, Takekeuchi K (1986) Factors affecting cerebospinal fluid flow in a shunt. Br J Neurosurg 1:467–475
Kadowaki C, Hara M, Numoto M, Takekeuchi K (1989) CSF hydrodynamics and CSF flow through a shunt in hydrocephalus. In: Hoff JT, Betz AL, et al (eds) VII/1. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 402–405
Keith HD, Watts C (1983) Testing of cerebrospinal fluid shunt systerms under dynamic flow conditions. Med Instrum 17:297–302
Keith HD, Avula X, Schelich C, Watts C (1981) Investigation of cerebrospinal fluid valves. Final report, phase II (USPH FDA 223-79-5064). University of Missouri, 1 August, 1981
Kiekens R, Mortier W, Pothmann R, Bock WJ, Seibert H (1982) The slitventricle syndrom after shunting in hydrocephalic children. Neuropediatrics 13:190–194
Kremer P, Aschoff A, Kunze S (1994) Risks of using siphon-reducing devices. Child's Nerv Syst 10:231–235
Lakke JPWF, Go KG (1968) A simple method to determine patency of ventriculo-atrial shunts in children with hydrocephalus. Neurochirurgia 11:210–216
Lumenta CB, N Roosen, Dietrich U (1990) Clinical experience with a pressure-adjustable valve SOPHY in the mangement of hydrocephalus. Child's Nerv Syst 6:1–6
Maitrot D, Valery CA, Boyer P, Kehrli P, Buchheit F (1991) Sophy shunts in the treatment of 130 patients. In: Matsumoto S, Tamaki N (eds) Hydrocephalus. Pathogenesis and treatment. Springer, Tokyo Berlin Heidelberg, pp 399–404
Martin AJ, Drake LM, Lemaire C, Henkelman RM (1989) Cerebrospinal fluid shunts: MR measurement of CSF shunt flow. Radiology 173:243–247
Matsumae M, Murakami T, Ueda M, Suzuki Y (1987) Dynamic changes of cerebrospinal fluid shunt in patient's daily life. Shoni no Noshinkei 3:30–34
Matsumae M, Sato O, Itoh K, Fukuda T, Suzuki Y (1989) Quantification of cerebrospinal fluid shunt flow rates. Assessment of the programmable pressure valve. Child's Nerv Syst 5:356–360
McCullough DC (1986) Symptomatic progressive ventriculomegaly in hydrocephalus with patent shunt and anti-siphon devices. Neurosurgery 4:617–621
McCullough DC, Wells M (1982) Complications with antisiphon devices in hydrocephalics with ventriculoperitoneal shunts. In: Epstein F, Raimondi AJ (eds) Concepts in paediatric neurosurgery, vol 2. Karger, Basel, pp 63–74
Oi S, Matsumoto S (1987) Infantile hydrocephalus and the slit ventricle syndrome in early infancy. Child's Nerv Syst 3:145–150
Portnoy HD (1990) Optimum position of the antisiphon device (letter). Neurosurgery 27:332–333
Portnoy HD, Schulte RR, Fox JL (1973) Antisiphon and reversible occlusion valves for shunting in hydrocephalus and preventing post-shunt subdural hematomas. J Neurosurg 38:729–738
Pudenz RH (1990) Optimum position of the antisiphon device (letter). Neurosurgery 27:333
Pudenz RH, Foltz EL (1991) Hydrocephalus: overdrainage by ventricular shunts. A review and recommendations. Surg Neurol 35:200–212
Richard KE, Block FR, Ackermann CW, Britten E, Steinberg J, Weber M (1989) Untersuchung des Regelverhaltens von Shuntsystemen zur operativen Behandlung des Hydrocephalus. Abschlußbericht zum Forschungsvorhaben RI 328/3-2 der DFG
Sainte-Rose C, Hooven MD, Hirsch JF (1987) A new, approach in the treatment of hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 66:213–226
Savader SJ, Savader BL, Murtagh FR, Clarke LP, Silbinger ML (1988) MR evaluation of flow in a ventricular shunt phantom with in vivo correlation. J Comp Assist Tomogr 12:765–769
Schmitt J, Spring A (1990) Die Therapie des Normaldruckhydrocephalus mit dem transcutan magnetisch verstellbaren Ventil. Neurochirurgia 33 [Suppl 1]:23–26
Schoener WF, Verheggen R, Reparon C, Markakis E (1991) Evaluation of shunt failures by compliance analysis and inspection of shunt valves and shunt materials, using microscopic or scanning electron microscopic techniques. In: Matsumoto S, Tamaki N (eds) Hydrocephalus. Pathogenesis and treatment. Springer, Tokyo Berlin Heidelberg, pp 452–472
Seida M, Ito U, Tomida S, Yamazaki S, Inaba Y (1987) Ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction with anti-siphon device in normal-pressure hydrocephalus: report of three cases. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 27:769–773
Serlo W, Saukkonen AL, Heikkinen E, Wendt L von (1989) The incidence and management of the slit ventricle syndrome. Acta Neurochir 99:113–116
Tokoro K, Chiba Y (1991) Optimum position for an antisiphon device in a cerebrospinal, fluid shunt system. Neurosurgery 29:519–525
Tokoro K, Chiba Y, Abe H (1991) Pitfalls of the Sophy programmable pressure valve: is it really better than a conventional valve and an anti-siphon device? In: Matsumoto S, Tamaki N (eds) Hydrocephalus. Pathogenesis and treatment. Springer, Tokyo Berlin Heidelberg, pp 405–421
Trost HA, Claussen G, Heissler H, Gaab MR (1991) Testing the hydrocephalus shunt valve: long term bench test result of various new and implanted hydrocephalus shunt valves. The need for a model for testing shunt valves under physiological conditions. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1 [Suppl 1]:38–40
Yamada H, Funakoshi T, Ando T, Sakai N, Sakata K (1979) Clinical studies on prevention of overdrainage syndrome after ventriculoperitoneal shunt by use of an antisiphon ball valve. Child's Brain 5:556–561
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper is an updated version of an oral presentation held at the Consensus Conference: Hydrocephalus '92 Assisi, Italy, 26–30 April 1992
Deceased
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aschoff, A., Kremer, P., Benesch, C. et al. Overdrainage and shunt technology. Child's Nerv Syst 11, 193–202 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00277653
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00277653