Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Toys, spatial ability, and science and mathematics achievement: Are they related?

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This review of research examines the possible relationships among children's toy playing habits, spatial abilities, and their science and mathematics achievements. Only studies that made use of United States subjects, aged 3- through 13-years-old, are included in the review. Toy playing habits, spatial ability, and science and mathematical achievement appear sex typed. Males and/or children who maintain a masculine sex role orientation tend to play with a wider variety of toys, exhibit superior spatial skills, and maintain greater science and mathematics achievement scores than females and/or children with feminine sex role orientations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adubato, S. A. Father involvement, sex typing, and the toy play of children. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1984, 46, 1353B. (University Microfilms No. DA85-03,083.)

  • Armstrong, J. M. A national assessment of participation and achievement of women in mathematics. In S. F. Chipman, L. R. Brush, & D. M. Wilson (Eds.), Women and mathematics: Balancing the equation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benbow, C. P. Home environments and toy preferences of extremely precocious students. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, April 1986.

  • Bishop, J. E. Developing students' spatial ability. The Science Teacher, 1978, 45, 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. E. Spatial abilities and mathematics education: A review. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1980, 11, 257–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, J. E., LaRue, A. A., & Olejnik, A. B. Sex-appropriate toy preferences and the ability to conceptualize toys as sex-role related. Developmental Psychology, 1979, 15, 339–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J., & Block, J. Cognitive development from childhood and adolescence. (NIMA Research Grant Mh 16080.) Unpublished manuscript, 1982.

  • Blomberg, J. F. Sex-typed channeling behavior in the preschool peer group: A study of toy choice in same-sex and cross-sex play dyads. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1981, 42, 3066A. (University Microfilms No. 82-00,028.)

  • Campbell, P. B. What's a nice girl like you doing in a math class? Phi Delta Kappen, 1986, 67(7), 516–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. (Ed.). The development of spatial cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corah, N. L. Differentiation in children and their parents. Journal of Personality, 1965, 33, 300–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crum, J. F. An observational study of the play patterns of elementary school children. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1980, 42, 399B. (University Microfilms No. 81-13,004.)

  • DiLeo, J. C., Moely, B. E., & Sulzer, J. L. Frequency and modifiability of children's preferences for sex-typed toys, games, and occupations. Child Study Journal, 1979, 9(2), 141–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. C. Letters to Santa Claus: Elementary school-age children's sex typed toy preferences in a natural setting. Sex Roles, 1983, 9(2), 159–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg,-Berg, N., Boothby, R., & Matson, T. Correlates of preschool girls' feminine and masculine toy preferences. Developmental Psychology, 1979, 15(3), 354–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, G. L., & Erickson, L. J. Females and science achievement: Evidence, explanations, and implications. Science Education, 1984, 68(2), 63–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, J. H., & Feldstein, S. Sex differences on televised toy commercials. Sex Roles, 1986, 8(6), 581–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E. Mathematics learning and the sexes: A review. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 1974, 5, 126–139. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E. Sex differences in mathematics-learning: Why? Elementary School Journal, 1974, 75, 183–190. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E., & Meyer, M. R. Girls, boys and mathematics. In T. R. Post (Ed.), Research-based methods for teachers of elementary and middle school mathematics. Newton, MA: Allyn & Bacon, Inc., 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. Sex related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization, and affective factors. American Educational Research Journal, 1977, 14(1), 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E., & Tate, L. A. The use of spatial visualization in mathematics by girls and boys. Journal of Research in Mathematics, 1985, 16(3), 187–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, L. H. The problem of women and mathematics. New York: Ford Foundation, 1981. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 211 353.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Frasher, R. S., Nurss, J. R., & Brogan, D. R. Children's toy preferences revisited: Implications for early childhood education. Child Care Quarterly, 1980, 9, 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, J. W., Ekstrom, R. B., & Price, L. A. Manual for kit of references tests for cognitive factors (rev. ed.). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, W. B. An observational study of children's pretend play: Age and sex differences. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1985, 46, 1709B-1710B. (University Microfilms No. DA85-15,064.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddings, M., & Halverson, C. F. Young children's use of toys in home environments. Family Relations, 1981, 30(1), 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodenough, D. R., & Eagle, C. J. A modification of the embedded figures test for use with young children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1963, 103, 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guay, R. B., & McDaniel, E. D. (1977). The relationship between mathematics achievement and spatial abilities among elementary school children. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 1977, 8, 211–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handel, R. D. Achievement attitudes in mathematics and science: Relationships between self-perceptions, aspirations, and extra-curricular activities. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, April 1986.

  • Harris, L. J. Sex differences in spatial ability: Possible environmental, genetic, and neurological factors. In M. Kinsbourne (Ed.), Asymmetrical function of the brain. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, W. J., & Doran, R. L. The second international science study: U.S. results. Phi Delta Kappan, 1985, 66(6), 414–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahle, J. B., (1983). The disadvantaged majority: Science education for women. AETS Outstanding Paper for 1983. Burlington, NC: Carolina Biological Supply Company, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krap, S. A., & Konstadt, N. L. Children's embedded figures test. New York: Cognitive Tests, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpoe, K. P., & Olney, R. L. The effect of boys' and girls' toys on sex-typed play in preadolescents. Sex Roles, 1983, 9(4), 507–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A. girls and science: An international study of sex differences in school science achievement (International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement IEA Monograph Studies No. 9). Stockholm: University of Stockholm, Institute of International Education, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keogh, B. K. Pattern coping under three conditions of an expanded spatial field. Developmental Psychology, 1971, 4, 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konsin, M. A. Spatial visualization and mathematical problem solving. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1980, 41, 3930A-3931A. (University Microfilms No. 80-23,417.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krenzke, T. L. The relationship between cognitive levels of play and child-selected play activities in younger and older preschool children. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1981, 42, 1472A. (University Microfilms No. 81-20,504)

  • Light, R. J., & Pillemer, D. B. Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 1985, 56, 1479–1498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockheed, M. E. Sex segregation and male preeminence in elementary classrooms. In E. Fennema & M. J. Ayer (Eds.), Women and education: Equity or equality? Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corporation, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, E. The learning of sex roles through toys and books: A woman's view. Young Children, 1973, 118, 226–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey, S. M. The emergence of sex differences in play in the preschool years: Peer influences. dissertation Abstracts International, 1981, 42, 3843B-3844B. (University Microfilms No. DA82-03,700.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, S. C. The relationship among sex role stereotyping, role preference, and sex differences in spatial visualization. Sex Roles, 1985, 1, 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold, H. L., & Cook, K. V. The content of boys' and girls' rooms as an index of parents' behavior. Child Development, 1975, 46(2), 459–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. Intellectual development of children by demographic and socioeconomic factors. (DHEW Publication No. (HSM) 72-1012, Series 11, No. 110.) Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. Sexism in the school of the '80s. Psychology Today, 1985, 19(3), 54–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. Sexism in the classroom: From grade school to graduate school. Phi Delta Kappen, 1986, 67(7), 512–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, L. A., & Markham, W. T. Sex stereotyping in children's toy advertisements. Sex Roles, 1985, 12(1–2), 157–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serbin, L. A., & Connor, J. M. Behaviorally based masculine and feminine activity preference scales for preschoolers: Correlates with other classroom behaviors and cognitive tests. Child Development, 1977, 48, 1411–1416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serbin, L. A., & Connor, J. M. Sex-typing children's play preferences and patterns of cognitive performance. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1979, 134, 315–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, J. A. Problem of sex differences in space perception and aspects of intellectual functioning. Psychological Review, 1967, 74, 290–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Signorella, M. L., & Jamison, W. Sex differences in the correlations among field dependence, spatial ability, sex role orientation, and performance on Piaget's water-level task. Developmental Psychology, 1978, 14(6), 689–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolnick, J., Langbort, C., & Day, L. How to encourage girls in math and science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, I. M. Spatial ability: Its educational and social significance. San Diego, CA: Robert B. Knapp, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauch, A. B. The development of sex difference in spatial and verbal abilities. American Psychologists, 1976.

  • Thurstone, L. L., & Thurstone, T. G. Factorial studies of intelligence. Psychometric Monographs, 1974, 2.

  • Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. Spatial ability: A critical review of the sex-linked major gene hypothesis. In M. A. Wittig & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Sex-related differences in cognitive functioning. New York: Academic Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetter, B. M. A statistical picture of women in science. Journal of College Science Teaching, November, 1985, 138–140.

  • Wilson, J. R., & Vandenberg, S. G. Sex differences in cognitions: Evidence from the Hawaii family study. In T. E. McGill, D. A. Dewsbeury, & B. D. Sachs (Eds.), Sex and behaviors: Stages and prospectus. New York: Plenum Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, H. A., Dyk, R. B., & Faterson, H. F. Psychological differentiation. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, H., Oltman, P., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. (1971). A manual for the embedded figures test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Oakland University, USA

    Dyanne M. Tracy

Authors
  1. Dyanne M. Tracy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tracy, D.M. Toys, spatial ability, and science and mathematics achievement: Are they related?. Sex Roles 17, 115–138 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287620

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287620

Keywords

Search

Navigation