Skip to main content
Log in

Single X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: Precision, correlation, and reference data

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The performance of a single X-ray absorptiometry (SXA) device incorporating an X-ray tube as a photon source was evaluated with respect to precision in vivo and in vitro, scan time, image quality, and correlation with an existing dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) device. SXA precision in vivo, expressed as a coefficient of variation (CV), was 0.66% for bone mineral content (BMC) and 1.05% for bone mineral density (BMD). Precision in vitro, based on 78 BMC measurements of a forearm phantom over 195 days, was 0.53%. Correlation with DXA at the 8 mm distal forearm site was high (r=0.97 for BMC and r=0.96 for BMD). A preliminary SXA reference database composed of 151 healthy Caucasian American women was developed to facilitate the interpretation of patient measurements. SXA scan time was 4 minutes and delivered a radiation exposure of 1.68 mrem. SXA image quality and spatial resolution were superior to SPA and comparable to DXA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sorenson JA, Cameron JR (1967) A reliable in vivo measurement of bone mineral content. J Bone Joint Surg Am 49:481–497

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cameron JR, Mazess RB, Sorenson JA (1968) Precision and accuracy of bone mineral determination by direct photon absorptiometry. Invest Radiol 3:141–150

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kelly TL, Slovik DM, Schoenfeld DA, Neer RM (1988) Quantitative digital radiography versus dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 67:839–844

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mazess RB, Collick B, Trempe J, Bardon HS, Hanson JA (1989) Performance evaluation of a dual-energy x-ray bone densitometer. Calcif Tissue Int 44:228–232

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lai KC, Goodsitt MM, Murano R, Chesnut CH III (1992) A comparison of two dual-energy absorptiometry systems for spinal bone mineral measurement. Calcif Tissue Int 50:203–208

    Google Scholar 

  6. Black DM, Cummings SR, Genant HK, Nevitt MC, Palermo L, Browner W (1992) Axial and appendicular bone density predicts fractures in older women. J Bone Miner Res 7:633–638

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Browner WS, Cauley JA, Genant HK, Mascioli SR, Scott JC, Seeley DG, Steiger P, Vogt TM (1990) Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. JAMA 263:665–668

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hui SL, Slemenda CW, Johnston CC Jr (1988) Age and bone mass as predictors of fracture in a prospective study. J Clin Invest 81:1804–1809

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Browner W, Cauley J, Ensrud K, Genant HK, Palermo L, Scott J, Vogt T (1993) Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. Lancet 341:72–75

    Google Scholar 

  10. Genant HK, Gluer CC, Faulkner KG, Majumdar S, Harris ST, Engelke K, Hagiwaea S, van Kuijk C (1982) Acronyms in bone densitometry (Letter to the Editor). J Bone Miner Res 7:1239

    Google Scholar 

  11. Price RI, Barnes MP, Gutteridge DH, Baron-Hay M, Prince RL, Retallack RW, Hickling C (1989) Ultradistal and cortical forearm bone density in the assessment of postmenopausal bone loss and nonaxial fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 4:149–155

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nilas L, Gotfredsen A, Hadberg A, Christiansen C (1988) Age-related bone loss in women evaluated by the single and dual photon technique. Bone Miner 4:95–103

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schlenker RA, Von Seggen WW (1976) The distribution of cortical and trabecular bone mass along the lengths of the radius and ulna and the implications for in vivo bone mass measurements. Calcif Tissue Res 20:41–52

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nilas L, Borg J, Gotfredsen A, Christiansen C (1985) Comparison of single- and dual-photon absorptiometry in postmenopausal bone mineral loss. J Nucl Med 26:1257–1262

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weinstein RS, New KD, Sappinton LJ (1991) Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry versus single photon absorptiometry of the radius. Calcif Tissue Int 49:313–316

    Google Scholar 

  16. Overton TR, Wheeler GD (1992) Bone mass measurements in the distal forearm using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and gamma-ray computed tomography: a longitudinal, in vivo comparative study. J Bone Miner Res 7:375–381

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leboff MS, El-Hajj Fuleihan G, Angell JE, Chung S, Curtis K (1992) Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: reproducibility and correlation with single-photon absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res 7:841–846

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nieves JW, Cosman F, Mars C, Lindsay R (1991) Comparative assessment of bone mineral density of the forearm using single photon and dual x-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int 51:352–355

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelly, T.L., Crane, G. & Baran, D.T. Single X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: Precision, correlation, and reference data. Calcif Tissue Int 54, 212–218 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301681

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301681

Key words

Navigation