Skip to main content
Log in

Species-specific effects of tending ants on the development of lycaenid butterfly larvae

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The transfer of nutrients between organisms is a common feature of mutualism. The production of these food rewards is often assumed to be costly. Estimation of the costs of producing food rewards is important for understanding the overall effects of the interaction on fitness. When food rewards are harvested by several species differing in foraging behavior, costs to the producer may differ. The larvae of many species in the butterfly family Lycaenidae produce secretions consumed by tending ants. Here I report that three North American ant species, Formica perpilosa, Dorymyrmex sp. (smithi complex), and Forelius foetida, had no negative effect on the duration of development and adult size of the lycaenid Hemiargus isola. Moreover, tending by the ant Formica perpilosa significantly enhanced larval growth, resulting in butterflies that were 20% heavier than their untended counterparts. Tending by the ants Dorymyrmex sp. (smithi complex) and Forelius foetida had no effect on butterfly weight. Tended, nonfeeding larvae lost 69% more weight than untended, nonfeeding larvae. Taken together, the results suggest that, although ant tending imposes a physiological cost, H. isola larvae use behavioral or physiological mechanisms to compensate or overcompensate for nutrients lost to ants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addicott JF (1979) A multispecies aphid-ant association: density dependent and species-specific effects. Can J Zool 57:558–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Atsatt PR (1981) Lycaenid butterflies and ants: selection for enemyfree space. Am Nat 118:638–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Baylis M (1989) The role of nutrition in an ant-lycaenid-host interaction. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oxford

  • Baylis M, Pierce NE (1992) The effects of ant mutualism on the foraging and diet of lycaenid caterpillars. In: Stamp NE, Casey TM (eds) Caterpillars: ecological and evolutionary constraints on foraging. Chapman Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatkar A, Whitcomb WH (1970) Artificial diet for rearing various species of ants. The F1 Entomol 53:230–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristow CM (1984) Differential benefits from ant attendance to two species of Homoptera on New York ironweed. J Anim Ecol 53:715–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggs CL (1986) Reproductive strategies of female butterflies: variation in and constraints on fecundity. Ecol Entomol 11:7–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucher DH, James S, Leeler KH (1982) The ecology of mutualism. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 13:315–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman JH, Rashbrook VK, Beattie AJ (1993) Demonstration of benefits to both participants in a lycaenid-ant association. Ecology (in press)

  • DeVries PJ (1988) The larval ant-organs of Thisbe irenea (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae) and their effects upon attending ants. Zool J Linn Soc 94:379–393

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVries PJ (1991) Mutualism between Thisbe irenea butterflies and ants, and the role of ant ecology in the evolution of larval-ant associations. Biol J Linn Soc 43:179–195

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVries PJ, Baker I (1989) Butterfly exploitation of an ant-plant mutualism: adding insult to herbivory. J New York Entomol Soc 97:332–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgar MA, Pierce NE (1988) Mating success and fecundity in an ant-tended butterfly. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Reproductive success. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 59–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliot JN (1973) The higher classification of the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera): a tenative arrangement. Bull Brit Mus (Nat Hist) Entomol 28:373–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler K (1991) European and North West African Lycaenidae and their associations with ants. J Res Lepid 28:239–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler K, Maschwitz U (1989) Functional analysis of the myrmecophilous relationships between ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and lycaenids (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). I. Release of food recruitment in ants by lycaenid larvae and pupae. Ethology 80:71–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler K, Hölldobler B (1992) Ants and Polyommatus icarus immatures (Lycaenidae) — sex-related developmental benefits and costs of ant attendance. Oecologia 91:468–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera CM (1987) Components of pollinator “quality”: comparative analysis of a diverse insect assemblage. Oikos 50:79–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton HE (1951) Myrmecophilous Lycaenidae and other Lepidoptera—a summary. Proc Trans S London Entomol Nat Hist Soc 1949–1951:111–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Honek A (1993) Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: a general relationship. Oikos 66:483–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Malicky H (1970) New aspects on the association between lycaenid larvae (Lycaenidae) and ants (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). J Lep Soc 24:190–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschwitz U, Wust M, Schurian K (1975) Blaudlingsraupen als Zuckerlieferanten für Ameisen. Oecologia 18:17–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson MA (1993) The nature of ant attendance and the survival of larval Icaricia acmon (Lycaenidae). J Lep Soc 47:6–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce NE (1983) The ecology and evolution of symbioses between lycaenid butterflies and ants. PhD dissertation, Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA

  • Pierce NE (1987) The evolution and biogeography of associations between lycaenid butterflies and ants. In: Harvey PH, Partridge L (eds) Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology, vol 4

  • Pierce NE, Easteal S (1986) The selective advantage of attendant ants for the larvae of a lycaenid butterfly, Glaucopsyche lygdamus. J Anim Ecol 55:451–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce NE, Kitching RL, Buckley RC, Taylor MFJ, Benbow KF (1987) The costs and benefits of cooperation between the Australian lycaenid butterny, Jalmenus evagoras, and its attendant ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:237–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Price PW, Bouton CE, Gross P, McPheron BA, Thompson JN, Weis AE (1980) Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11:41–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins RK (1991) Cost and evolution of a facultative mutualism between ants and lycaenid larvae (Lepidoptera). Oikos, 62:363–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Savignano DA (1990) Field investigations of a facultative mutualism between Lycaeides melissa samuelis Nabokov (Lycaenidae), the Karner blue butterfly, and attendant ants. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin

  • Schemske DW, Horvitz CC (1984) Variation among floral visitors in pollination ability: a precondition for mutualism specialization. Science 225:519–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott JA (1986) The butterflies of North America. Stanford Univ Press, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry (Second Edition). WH Freeman & Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JN (1982) Interaction and coevolution. John Wiley Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer BJ, Brown DR, Michels KM (1991) Statistical principles in experimental design (Third edition). McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 169–172

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wagner, D. Species-specific effects of tending ants on the development of lycaenid butterfly larvae. Oecologia 96, 276–281 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317742

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317742

Key words

Navigation