Summary
Data on 46 mutations in the structural gene, Ddc. for dopa decarboxylase and 33 mutations in the αmethyl dopa hypersensitive gene, 1(2)amd, in Drosophila melanogaster are presented including information on their isolation, their effects on DDC activity, and their sensitivity to dietary αmethyl dopa. Intragenic complementation of both loci is documented, the effects of heteroallelic complementing heterozygosity on DDC activity, in vitro thermolability of DDC, and on temperature sensitive viability are presented. Data are marshalled to support rejection of the hypothesis that Ddc mutations and 1(2)amd, mutations are lesions in a single gene.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Auerbach C (1956) Analysis of the mutagenic action of formaldehyde food. III. Conditions influencing the effectiveness of the treatment. Z Indukt Abstamm Vererbungsl 87:627–647
Clark WC, Pass PS, Venkataraman B, Hodgetts RB (1978) Dopa decarboxylase from Drosophila melanogaster. Purification, characterization, and an analysis of mutants. Mol Gen Genet 162:287–297
Dewhurst SA, Croker SG, Ikeda K, McCaman RE (1972) Metabolism of biogenic amines in Drosophila nervous tissue. Comp Biochem Physiol 43B:475–481
Epler JL (1966) Ethyl methanesulfonate-induced lethals in Drosophila-frequency-dose relations and multiple mosaicism. Genetics 54:31–36
Gilbert D, Hirsh J (1981) The dopa decarboxylase gene locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Orientation of the gene and preliminary mapping of genetic markers. pp 11–16 In: Brown DD (ed) Developmental biology using purified genes. Academic Press, Inc, New York
Gilbert D, Hirsh J, Wright TRF (in preparation)
Hirsh J, Davidson N (1981) Isolation and characterization of the dopa decarboxylase gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol 6:475–485
Jenkins JB (1967) Mutagenesis at a complex locus in Drosophila with a monofunctional alkylating agent, ethylmethanesulfonate. Genetics 57:783–793
Kraminsky GP, Clark WC, Estelle MA, Geitz RD, Sage BA, O'Connor JD, Hodgetts RB (1980) Induction of translatable mRNA for dopa decarboxylase in Drosophila: An early response to ecdysterone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:4175–4179
Lewis EB, Bacher F (1968) Method for feeding ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) to Drosophila males. Drosophila Inform Ser 43:193
Lindsley DL, Grell EH (19680 Genetic Variations of Drosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Inst Washington Publ 627
Livingstone MS (1981) Two mutations in Drosophila differentially affect the synthesis of octopamine, dopamine, and serotonin by altering the activities of two different amino acid decarboxylases. Soc Neuroscience Abtr. 7:117.1
Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RF (1951) Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–269
Lunan KD, Mitchell HK (1969) The metabolism of tyrosine-O-phosphate in Drosophila. Arch Biochem Biophys 132:450–456
Marsh JL, Wright TRF (1979) Control of dopa decarboxylase expression during development in Drosophila, p 183–194. In: Axel R, Maniatis T, Fox CF (eds) Eucaryotic gene regulation, ICN-UCLA Symposia on Molecular and Cell Biology, Vol XIV. Academic Press, Inc pp 661
Marsh JL, Wright TRF (1980) Developmental relationship between dopa decarboxylase, dopamine acetyltransferase, and ecdysone in Drosophila. Develop Biol 80:379–387
Marsh JL, Wright TRF (1982) Molecular characterization of overproducer variants of Ddc and 1(2)amd, in Drosophila melanogaster (in preparation)
McCaman MW, McCaman RE, Lees GJ (1972) Liquid cation exchange — a basis for sensitive radiometric assays for aromatic amino acid decarboxylase. Anal Biochem 45:242–252
Nüsslein-Volhard C, Wieschaus E (1980) Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature (Lond) 287:795–801
Rizki MTM (1956) The secretory activity of the proventriculus of Drosophila melanogaster. J Exp Zool 131:203–222
Sankaranarayanan K, Sobels FH (1976) Radiation genetics, p 1089–1250. In: Ashburner M, Novitski E (eds) The genetics and biology of Drosophila, Vol 1c. Academic Press, Inc pp 1481
Sherald AF, Sparrow JC, Wright TRF (1973) A spectrophotometric assay for Drosophila dopa decarboxylase. Anal Biochem 56:300–305
Sherald AF, Wright TRF (1974) The analog inhibitor, α-methyl dopa, as a screening agent for mutants elevating levels of dopa decarboxylase in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Gen Genet 133:25–36
Shukla PT, Auerbach C (1980) Genetic tests for the detection of chemically induced small deletions in Drosophila chromosomes. Mut Res 72:231–243
Sparrow JC, Wright TRF (1974) The selection of mutants in Drosophila melanogaster hypersensitive to α-methyl dopa, a dopa decarboxylase inhibitor. Mol Gen Genet 130:127–141
Wright TRF (1977) The genetics of dopa decarboxylase and α-methyl dopa sensitivity in Drosophila melanogaster. Am Zool 17:707–721
Wright TRF, Beermann W, Marsh JL, Bishop CB, Steward R, Black BC, Tomsett AD, Wright EY (1981) The genetics of dopa decarboxylase in Drosophila melanogaster. IV. The genetics and cytology of the 37B10-37D1 region chromosoma (Berl) 83:45–58
Wright TRF, Bewley GC, Sherald AF (1976a) The genetics of dopa decarboxylase in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Isolation and characterization of dopa-decarboxylase-deficient mutants and their relationship to the α-methyl-dopa-hypersensitive mutants. Genetics 84:287–310
Wright TRF, Hodgetts RB, Sherald AF (1976b) The genetics of dopa decarboxylase in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Isolation and characterization of deficiencies that delete the dopa-decarboxylase-dosage-sensitive region and the α-methyl-dopa-hypersensitive locus. Genetics 84:267–285
Wright TRF, Steward R, Bentley KW, Adler PN (1981) The genetics of dopa decarboxylase in Drosophila melanogaster. III. Effects of a temperature sensitive dopa decarboxylase deficient mutation on female fertility. Develop Genet 2:223–235
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by M.M. Green
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wright, T.R.F., Black, B.C., Bishop, C.P. et al. The genetics of dopa decarboxylase in Drosophila melanogaster . Molec Gen Genet 188, 18–26 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00332991
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00332991