Skip to main content
Log in

Probability and certainty: A reexamination of the Lewis-Reichenbach debate

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

I have shown as promised that Reichenbach did not refute either thesis (I) or thesis (II). I have also shown that an argument of Lewis's may be used to establish a weakened version of (I) that has two interesting consequences: if we are to assign probabilities with any justification at all, we must have either certainties or intrinsic probabilities; and if we are frequentists, we must have certainties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Cleve, J. Probability and certainty: A reexamination of the Lewis-Reichenbach debate. Philosophical Studies 32, 323–334 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00368686

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00368686

Keywords

Navigation