Skip to main content
Log in

Prisoner's paradoxes

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As levels of trust decrease and the necessity for trust increase in our society, we are increasingly driven toward the untoward, even disastrous, outcomes of the prisoner's dilemma. Yet despite the growing evidence that (re)building conditions of trust is increasingly mandatory in our era, modern moral philosophy (by default) and the social sciences (implicitly) legitimize an instrumental rationality which is the root problem. The greatest danger is that as conditions of trust are rationalized away through the progressive institutionalization of an instrumental rationality, we are driven towards the most virulent form of the prisoner's paradox — ethical relativism and its nihilistic consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arendt, Hannah: 1971, ‘Thinking and Moral Considerations’, Social Research 38 (Autumn 1971), 417–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, Gregory: 1979, Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity (E. P. Dutton, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Ernest: 1974, The Denial of Death (The Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, Robert et al.: 1985, Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life (University of California Press, Berkeley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, Sissela: 1979, Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life (Random House, Vintage Books edition, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James: 1985, ‘The Moral Dimension of Debt Financing’, Economic Inquiry 23 (January 1985), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Jeremy: 1982, Grammatical Man: Information, Entropy, Language, and Life (Simon & Schuster, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, Fritjof: 1982, The Turning Point: Science, Society, and the Rising Culture (Simon & Schuster, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, Peter: 1981, ‘What Is “Business Ethics”?’, The Public Interest 63 (Spring 1981), 18–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, Amitai: 1983, An Immodest Agenda: Rebuilding America Before the 21st Century (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford: 1973, Interpretation of Cultures (Basic Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, Carol: 1982, In a Different Voice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, Robert: 1987, Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, Arthur O.: 1936, The Great Chain of Being: A Study in the History of an Idea (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair: 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory (Notre Dame University Press, Notre Dame).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, Daniel: 1985, ‘The Paranoid Style in American Politics Revisited’, The Public Interest 81 (Fall 1985), 108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincoffs, Edmund: 1986, Quandaries and Virtues: Against Reductivism in Ethics (Kansas State University Press, Lawrence).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos, Alberto: 1981, The New Science of Organizations: A Reconceptualization of the Wealth of Nations (Toronto University Press, Toronto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, Robert: 1985, ‘Toward a New Public Philosophy’, The Atlantic Monthly (May 1985), 68–79.

  • Reich, Robert: 1987, Tales of a New America (Random House, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, Arthur M. Jr.: 1986, The Cycles of American History (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurow, Lester: 1980, The Zero-Sum Society: Distribution and the Possibilities for Economic Change (Basic Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurow, Lester: 1985, ‘The Dishonesty Economy’, 32 New York Review of Books (Nov. 21, 1985), 34–37.

  • Wilson, James Q.: 1985, ‘The Rediscovery of Character: Private Virtue and Public Policy’, The Public Interest 81 (Fall 1985), 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Jonathan B. King is Associate Professor of Management at the College of Business at Oregon State University. He received his B.A. in philosophy from Antioch College (1965) and his M.B.A. in Finance (1975) and Ph.D. in Business, Government and Society (1980) from the University of Washington. His primary research interests are in the areas of moral philosophy and epistemology. His most important publications are ‘A Case for the Humanities Perspective’, Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal 1984; ‘The Three Faces of Thinking’, Journal of Higher Education (1986), and ‘Ethical Encounters of the Second Kind’, Journal of Business Ethics (1986).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

King, J.B. Prisoner's paradoxes. J Bus Ethics 7, 475–487 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382594

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382594

Keywords

Navigation