Skip to main content
Log in

Capitalism and rights: An essay toward fine tuning the moral foundations of the free society

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The moral foundations of the free society are not epitomized by democratic decisions about costs and benefits, as Michael Novak recently argued in The American Vision: An Essay on the Future of Democratic Capitalism. Nor is equality of opportunity, insured through government measures that prohibit private discrimination, a component of the liberty that characterizes the free society, as Milton and Rose Friedman recently argued in their Free To Choose. Rather, it is the theory of rights — which is the theory of private property, broadly understood — that underpins and epitomizes the free society, justifying the capitalist economic order in the process. For that theory describes our basic moral and legal relationships, and shows as well that capitalism, unlike socialism, is a fundamentally moral system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Selected bibliography

  • Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics, ed. by Martin Ostwald (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailyn, Bernard: The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution (Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press, 1967).

  • Becker, Carl L.: The Declaration of Independence: A Study in the History of Political Ideas (Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1922).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, Isaiah: Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Corwin, Edward S.: The ‘Higher Law’ Background of American Constitutional Law (Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Richard A.: ‘Pleadings and Presumptions’, University of Chicago Law Review 40 (1973), 556–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Richard A.: ‘A Theory of Strict Liability’, Journal of Legal Studies 2 (1973), 151–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Richard A.: ‘Defenses and Subsequent Pleas in a System of Strict Liability’, Journal of Legal Studies 3 (1974), 165–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Richard A.: ‘Intentional Harms’, Journal of Legal Studies 4 (1975), 391–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Richard A.: ‘Nuisance Law: Corrective Justice and Its Utilitarian Constraints’, Journal of Legal Studies 8 (1979), 49–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton and Rose: Free to Choose: A Personal Statement (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York and London, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirth, Alan: Reason and Morality (University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grier, Philip T.: Marxist Ethical Theory in the Soviet Union (D. Reidel, Dordrecht Holland, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A.: ‘Are There Any Natural Rights?’, Philosophical Review 64 (1955), 175–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretzmer, David: ‘Judicial Conservatism v. Economic Liberalism’, Israel Law Review 13 (1978), 298–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John. Second Treatise of Government, in John Locke: Two Treatises of Government, rev. ed., ed. by Peter Laslett (Mentor, New York, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Markovits, Inga: ‘Socialist vs. Bourgeois Rights — An East-West German Comparison’, University of Chicago Law Review 45 (1978), 612–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, Michael: The American Vision: An Essay on the Future of Democratic Capitalism (American Enterprise Institute, Washington, D.C., 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, Robert: Anarchy, State, and Utopia (Basic Books, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, Ellen Frankel: Moral Revolution and Economic Science: The Demise of Laissez-Faire in Nineteenth Century British Political Economy (Greenwood Press, Westport, Conn., 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilon, Roger: A Theory of Rights: Toward Limited Government, Ph.D. dissertation (University of Chicago, 1979).

  • Pilon, Roger: ‘Corporations and Rights: On Treating Corporate People Justly’, Georgia Law Review 13 (1979), 1245–1370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilon, Roger: ‘Ordering Rights Consistently: Or What We Do and Do Not Have Rights To’, Georgia Law Review 13 (1979), 1171–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipes, Richard: Contributor to ‘Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy: A Symposium’, Commentary, April 1978, pp. 65–6.

  • Raphael, D. D. (ed.): Political Theory and the Rights of Man (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, Richard M.: Ideas Have Consequences (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1948).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Roger Pilon, Research Fellow, Institute for Humane Studies, 1177 University Drive, Menlo Park, CA 94025; currently: Special Assistant to the Director, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Washington, D.C. 20415; A.B., Columbia University, 1971; M.A., Ph.D., University of Chicago, 1972, 1979.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pilon, R. Capitalism and rights: An essay toward fine tuning the moral foundations of the free society. J Bus Ethics 1, 29–42 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382804

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382804

Keywords

Navigation