Summary
The Simon effect indicates that choice reactions can be performed more quickly if the response corresponds spatially to the stimulus - even when stimulus location is irrelevant to the task. Two experiments tested an intentional approach to the Simon effect that assigns a critical role to the cognitively represented action goal (i. e., the intended action effect). It was assumed that the direction of the Simon effect depends on stimulus-goal correspondence, that is, that responses are faster with spatial correspondence of stimulus and intended action effect. Experiment 1 confirmed that the direction of the Simon effect was determined by spatial correspondence of stimulus and intended action effect, the latter having been manipulated by different instructions. Experiment 2 indicated that effects of correspondences unrelated to the action goal (i. e., stimulus to hand location or to anatomical mapping of the hand), contributed additively to the resulting Simon effect. It is discussed how current approaches to the Simon effect can be elaborated to account for these results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anzola, G. P., Bertolini, G., Buchtel, H. A., & Rizzolatti, G. (1977). Spatial compatibility and anatomical factors in simple and choice reaction times. Neuropsychologia, 15, 295–302.
Bradshaw, J. L., Bradshaw, J. A., Pierson-Savage, J. M., & Nettleton, N. C. (1988). Overt and covert attention and vibrotactile reaction times: Gaze direction, spatial compatibility and hemispatial asymmetry. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 44–56.
Brebner, J. (1973). S-R compatibility and changes in RT with practice. Acta Psychologica, 37, 93–106.
Brebner, J., Shepard, M., & Cairney, P. (1972). Spatial relationships and S-R compatibility. Acta Psychologica, 36, 1–15.
Callan, J., Klisz, D., & Parsons, O. A. (1974). Strength of auditory stimulus-response compatibility as a function of task complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 1039–1045.
Guiard, Y. (1983). The lateral coding of rotations: A study of the Simon effect with wheel-rotation responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 331–342.
Hasbroucq, T., & Guiard, Y. (1991). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward a conceptual clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 246–266.
Hays, W. L. (1988). Statistics (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Hedge, A., & Marsh, N. W. A. (1975). The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondences on two-choice response-time. Acta Psychologica, 39, 427–439.
Hommel, B. (1993). The role of attention for the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 55, 208–221.
Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility — A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.
Merz, F., Kalveram, K. T., & Huber, K. (1981). Der Einfluss kognitiver Faktoren auf Steuerleistu:ngen. In L. Tent (Ed.), Erkennen, Wollen, Handeln (pp. 327–335). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Michaels, C. F. (1988). S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: Evidence of the detection of affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 231–240.
Nicoletti, R., Anzola, G. P., Luppino, G., Rizzolatti, G., & Umilta, C. (1982). Spatial compatibility effects on the same side of the body midline. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 664–673.
Nicoletti, R., & Umilta, C. (1989). Splitting visual space with attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 164–169.
Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception andaction: Current approaches (pp. 167–201). Berlin: Springer.
Riggio, L., Gawryszewski, L., & Umilta, C. (1986). What is crossed in crossed-hand effects? Acta Psychologica, 62, 89–100.
Schroeder-Heister, P., Heister, G., & Ehrenstein, W. H. (1988). Spatial S-R compatibility under head tilt. Acta Psychologica, 69, 35–44.
Simon, J. R. (1967). Choice reaction time as a function of auditory S-R correspondence, age and sex. Ergonomics, 10, 659–664.
Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174–176.
Simon, J. R., & Acosta Jr., E. (1982). Effect of irrelevant information on the processing of relevant information: Facilitation and/or interference? The influence of experimental design. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 383–388.
Simon, J. R., Hinrichs, J. V., & Craft, J. L. (1970). Auditory S-R compatibility: Reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 97–102.
Simon, J. R., & Small, A. M. (1969). Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrelevant cue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 433–435.
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315.
Stoffels, E.-J., Van der Molen, M. W., & Keuss, P. J. G. (1989). An additive factors analysis of the effect(s) of location cues associated with auditory stimulation on stages of information processing. Acta Psychologica, 70, 161–197.
Stoffer, T. H. (1991). Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Research, 53, 127–135.
Umiltà, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1985). Attention and coding effects in S-R compatibility due to irrelevant spatial cues. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 457–471). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Verfaellie, M., Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1990). Attentional processes in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 261–275). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Wallace. R. A. (1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354–360.
Wallace, R. J. (1972). Spatial S-R compatibility effects involving kinesthetic cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 163–168.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hommel, B. Inverting the Simon effect by intention. Psychol. Res 55, 270–279 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419687
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419687