Skip to main content
Log in

Performance differences between addicts and non-addicts

  • Human Pharmacology
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Methadone addicts and non-addict controls were tested before and after receiving up to 10 mg of methadone on simple visual reaction time tests and on a vigilance type visual attention test. Addicts were faster than controls on pre-drug testing, although there were no pre-drug differences between groups on the attention task. Addicts maintained faster reaction times than controls even when money was offered as an incentive for speed. Additional methadone did not affect addict performance on any of the tasks. Methadone slowed control reaction times in a doserelated fashion. No significant attention decrements were seen after methadone in controls. Visual reaction time differences between addicts and controls cannot be attributed to group differences in motivation or ability to attend. Slowing of reaction time with acute dose of methadone in controls cannot be attributed to the effect of the drug on attention. An hypothesized drug-induced decrease in visual sensitivity with acute dose in controls and a drug-induced increase in visual sensitivity with chronic dose in addicts can account for the presented data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armor, D. J., Couch, A. S.: Data-Text primer: An introduction to computerized social data analysis. New York: Free Press 1972

    Google Scholar 

  • Dole, V. P., Nyswander, M. E.: Medical treatment for diacetylmorphine (heroin) addiction. A clinical trial with methadone hydrochloride. J. Amer. Med. Ass. 193, 646–650 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, E.: Activation and behavior. New York-London: Wiley 1962

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, W. O., Jewett, A.: The effect of some centrally acting drugs on disjunctive reaction time. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 3, 124–127 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Foldes, F., Swerdlow, M., Siker, E.: Narcotics and narcotic antagonists. Springfield, Ill.: Ch. C. Thomas 1964

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenhaeuser, M., Post, B.: Objective and subjective performance as influenced by drug-induced variations in activation level. Univ. Stockholm Psychol. Lab. Rep 184, 1–18 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L., Gilman, A.: The pharmacological basis of therapeutics, 4th ed. New York: MacMillan 1970

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, N. B.: Reaction times of methadone treated ex-heroin addicts. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 16, 337–344 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorens, S., Mitchell, C.: Influence of morphine on lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation in the rat. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 32, 271–277 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackworth, J.: The effect of amphetamine on the detectability of signals in a vigilance task. Canad. J. Psychol. 19, 104–110 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirsky, A., Kornetsky C.: On the dissimilar effects of drugs on the digit symbol substitution and continuous performance tests. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 5, 161–177 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, G. L., Pearson, R. G.: Comparative effects of age, sex and drugs upon two tasks of auditory vigilance. Percept. Motor Skills 23, 967–975 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pribram, K. H., McGuinness, D.: Arousal, activation, and efforts in the control of attention Psychol. Rev. 82, 116–149 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosvold, H., Mirsky, A., Sarason, I., Bransome, E., Jr., Beck, L.: A continuous performance test of brain damage. J. cons. Psychol. 20, 343–350 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schottenfeld, S., Rothenberg, S.: An automated laboratory control system: Collection and analysis of behavioral and electrophysiological data. Computer Progr Biomed. 5, 296–306 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdman, A. V., Arushanyan, E. B.: The influence of analgetic drugs on segmental and suprasegmental inhibition. In: Pharmacology and physiology of the reticular formation, Progress in brain research. Vol. 20, A. V. Valdman, ed., pp. 223–242. Amsterdam: Elsevier 1967

    Google Scholar 

  • Volavka, J., Zaks, A., Roubicek, J., Fink, M.: Electrographic effects of diacetylmorphine (heroin) and naloxone in man. Neuropharmacology 9, 587–593 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikler, A.: Dynamics of drug dependence: Implications of a conditioning theory for research and treatment. In: Opiate addictions: origins and treatment, S. Fisher and A. M. Freedman, eds., pp. 7–21. Washington, D. C.: Winston 1973

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth, R., Schlossberg, H.: Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1954

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rothenberg, S., Schottenfeld, S., Meyer, R.E. et al. Performance differences between addicts and non-addicts. Psychopharmacology 52, 299–306 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00426715

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00426715

Key words

Navigation