Skip to main content
Log in

Fully explicit and self-consistent algebraic Reynolds stress model

  • Published:
Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A fully explicit, self-consistent algebraic expression (for Reynolds stress) which is the exact solution to the Reynolds stress transport equation in the “weak-equilibrium” limit for two-dimensional mean flows for all linear and some quasi-linear pressure-strain models, is derived. Current explicit algebraic Reynolds stress models derived by employing the “weak-equilibrium” assumption treat the production-to-dissipation (P/ɛ) ratio as a constant, resulting in an effective viscosity that can be singular away from the equilibrium limit. In this paper the set of simultaneous algebraic Reynolds stress equations in the weak-equilibrium limit are solved in the full nonlinear form and the eddy viscosity is found to be nonsingular. Preliminary tests indicate that the model performs adequately, even for three-dimensional mean-flow cases. Due to the explicit and nonsingular nature of the effective viscosity, this model should mitigate many of the difficulties encountered in computing complex turbulent flows with the algebraic Reynolds stress models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. Rodi, A new algebraic relation for calculating Reynolds stress, Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 56, T219-T221 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S.B. Pope, A more general effective-viscosity hypothesis, J. Fluid. Mech. 72, 331–340 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  3. D.B. Taulbee, An improved algebraic stress model and corresponding nonlinear stress model, Phys. Fluids A 4, 2555–2561 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  4. T.B. Gatski and C.G. Speziale, On explicit algebraic stress models for complex turbulent flows, J. Fluid Mech. 254, 59–78 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. B.E. Launder, G.J. Reece, and W. Rodi, Progress in the development of Reynolds stress turbulence closure, J. Fluid Mech. 68, 537–566 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.M. Gibson and B.E. Launder, Ground effects of pressure fluctuations in the atmospheric boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 86, 491–511 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  7. C.G. Speziale, S. Sarkar, and T.B. Gatski, Modeling the pressure-strain correlation of turbulence: an invarian dynamical system approach, J. Fluid Mech. 227, 245–272 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Bardina, J.H. Ferziger, and W.C. Reynolds, Improved Turbulence Models Based on Large Eddy Simulation of Homogeneous, Incompressible Turbulent Flows, Tech. Rep. TF-19, Stanford University, 1983.

  9. M.J. Lee and W.C. Reynolds, Numerical Experiments on the Structure of Homogeneous Turbulence, Tech. Rep. TF-24, Stanford University, 1985.

  10. P.R. Spalart, Numerical study of sink-flow boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 172, 307–326 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.R. Carlson, High Reynolds Number Analysis of Flat Plate and Sparated Afterbody Flow Using Non-Linear Turbulence Models. AIAA 96-2544, 32nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, July 1–3, 1996, Lake Buena Vista, Florida.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by M.Y. Hussaini

This research was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under NASA Contract No. NAS1-19480.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Girimaji, S.S. Fully explicit and self-consistent algebraic Reynolds stress model. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dynamics 8, 387–402 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00455991

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00455991

Keywords

Navigation