Skip to main content
Log in

S(−)DP-5,6-ADTN as an in vivo dopamine receptor ligand: Relation between displacement by dopamine agonists and their pharmacological effects

  • Published:
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The use of (−)DP-5,6-ADTN as a non-radio-actively labeled ligand for an in vivo DA receptor assay is described and compared with racemic DP-5,6-ADTN, previously used for that purpose. The effects of four DA agonists (NPA, bromocriptine, DP-7-OH-ATN and 3-PPP) on the specific (−)DP-5,6-ADTN binding are related to their potencies to decrease striatal HVA concentrations and to induce stereotypy in rats. NPA and DP-7-OH-ATN caused a maximal decrease in HVA levels, when only a fraction of the receptors were occupied, while the occurrence of stereotypy was associated with a high receptor occupation, reflecting the higher affinity of these agonists for presynaptic than for postsynaptic receptors. Bromocriptine did not show this effect, as the dose-response relationships for HVA decrease, for induction of stereotypy and for the decrease in specific (−)DP-5,6-ADTN binding were all virtually equal to each other. While NPA and bromocriptine behaved as full postsynaptic agonists, in that maximal stereotyped behavior was observed after high doses, DP-7-OH-ATN was found to be a partial postsynaptic agonist, as it did not induce maximal stereotypy at a maximal receptor occupation. Racemic 3-PPP only caused a state of hypoactivity, but did neither affect specific (−)DP-5,6-ADTN binding nor striatal HVA levels. Our results are discussed in view of theories on the relation between receptor occupation and pharmacological effects and it is concluded that the in vivo receptor binding method using (−)DP-5,6-ADTN is a very useful tool for such investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Billard W, Ruperto V, Crosby G, Iorio LC, Barnett A (1984) Characterization of the binding of 3H-SCH 23390, a selective D1 receptor antagonist ligand, in the rat striatum. Life Sci 35:1885–1893

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson A (1975) Receptor-mediated control of dopamine metabolism. In: Usdin E, Bunney WE (eds) Pre- and postsynaptic receptors, Decker, New York, pp 49–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson A (1983) Dopamine receptor agonists: intrinsic activity vs. state of receptor. J Neural Transm 57:309–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson A, Löfberg L (1985) In-vivo displacement by 3-PPP enantiomers of N,N-dipropyl-5,6-ADTN from rat striatal dopamine receptor binding sites. J Neural Transm 64:173–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen AV, Arnt J, Hyttel J, Svendse O (1984) Behavioral correlates to the dopamine D1 and D2 antagonists. Pol J Pharmacol Pharm 36:249–264

    Google Scholar 

  • DeJesus OT, Revenaugh JR, Dinerstein RJ, Friedman AM (1984) In vivo binding of spiroperidol and bromospiroperidol at low drug loadings. Life Sci 35:2165–2168

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebersole BJ, Weinstein H, Maayani S (1984) Differences in d-(3H)-lysergic acid diethylamide binding in mouse cortex and hippocampus in vivo and in vitro revealed by autoradiography and rapid filtration studies. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 229:865–871

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra MGP, Rollema H, Grol CJ, Horn AS, Westerink BHC (1980) Effect of non-catecholic 2-aminotetralin derivatives on dopamine metabolism in the rat striatum. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 313:213–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra MGP, Rollema H, Mulder TBA, Westerink BHC, Horn AS (1983) In vivo dopamine receptor binding studies with a non-radioactively labeled agonist, dipropyl-5,6-ADTN. Life Sci 32:1313–1323

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra MGP, Rollema H, Mulder TBA, de Vries JB, Horn AS (1983a) In vivo dopamine agonist binding in rat brain: relation with pharmacological effects. Eur J Pharmacol 90:433–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra MGP, Summers C, Goedemoed JH, de Vries JB, Rollema H, Horn AS (1983b) A comparison of the potencies of various dopamine receptor agonists in models for pre- and postsynaptic activity. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 324:108–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra MGP (1984) Dopamine receptor agonists: neuropharmacological and bioanalytical evaluation. PhD Thesis, University of Groningen. the Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman HS, McDermed JD (1981) Chemical regulation of biological mechanisms. Proc 1st Med Chem Symp Cambridge England Royal Soc Chem ISSN 42:6260–6291

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman ME, Kebabian JW (1984) Aporphine enantiomers: interactions with D1 and D2 dopamine receptors. Mol Pharmacol 25:18–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Grol CJ, Jansen LJ, Rollema H (1985) Resolution of 5,6-dihydroxy-2-(N,N-di-n-propylamino)tetralin in relation to the structural and stereochemical requirements for centrally acting dopamine agonists. J Med Chem 28:679–683

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth S, Carlsson A, Clark D, Svensson K, Wikström H, Sanchez D, Lindberg P, Hacksell U, Arvidsson L-E, Johansson A, Nilsson JLG (1983) Central dopamine receptor agonist and antagonist actions of the enantiomers of 3-PPP. Psychopharmacol 81:89–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn AS, de Vries JB, Dijkstra D, Mulder AH (1982) Is TL-99 a selective presynaptic dopamine receptor agonist? Eur J Pharmacol 83:35–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Kebabian JW, Calne DB (1979) Multiple receptors for dopamine. Nature 277:93–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Laduron P (1981) Dopamine receptor: a unique site with multiple postsynaptic localization. In: Gessa GL, Corsini GU (eds) Apomorphine and other dopaminomimetics, vol 1. Basic pharmacology. Raven Press, New York, pp 95–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Lark PD, Craven BR, Bosworth RCL (1968) The handling of chemical data. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Briley M, Langer SZ (1983) Characterization of dopamine autoreceptor and 3H-spiperone binding sites in vitro with classical and novel dopamine receptor agonists. Eur J Pharmacol 88:11–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis MH, Baumeister AA, McCorkle DL, Mailman RB (1985) A computer-supported method for analyzing behavioral observations: studies with stereotypy. Psychopharmacol 85:204–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Mailman RB, Rollema H, Schulz D, DeHaven DL, Lewis MH (1984) Dopamine receptor multiplicity: when the D1 antagonist is a D2 antagonist. Fed Proc 43:1095

    Google Scholar 

  • Mailman RB, Schulz DW, Lewis MH, Staples L, Rollema H, DeHaven DL (1984a) SCH 23390: a selective D1 dopamine antagonist with potent D2 behavioral actions. Eur J Pharmacol 101:159–160

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermed JD, McKenzie DM, Phillips AP (1975) Synthesis and pharmacology of some 2-aminotetralins. Dopamine receptor agonists. J Med Chem 18:362–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder TBA, Grol CJ, Dijkstra D, Horn AS (1985) Kinetic and pharmacological profiles of the in vitro binding of the pontent dopamine agonist (3H)N,N-dipropyl-5,6-dihydroxy-2-aminotetralin to rat striatal membranes. Eur J Pharmacol 112:73–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastor G, Fallon S, Welch JJ, Liebeman JM (1983) Postsynaptic dopamine agonist properties TL-99 are revealed by yohimbine cotreatment. Eur J Pharmacol 87:459–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollema H, Grol CJ, Feenstra MGP (1983) Stereoselectivity of COMT for the dopamine agonist DP-5,6-ADTN. Progr. Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psych Suppl 264

  • Rollema H, Mastebroek D, Wikström H, Horn AS (1985) In vitro and in vivo metabolism of the presynaptic dopamine agonist 3-PPP to a catecholic analogue in rats. J Pharm Pharmacol 37:314–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum JS, Holford NHG, Richards ML, Aman RA, Sadée W (1984) Discrimination of three types of opioid binding sites in rat brain in vivo. Mol Pharmacol 25:242–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Saller CF, Salama AI (1985) Dopamine receptor subtypes: in vivo biochemical evidence for functional interaction. Eur J Pharmacol 109:297–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz DW, Wyrick SD, Mailman RB (1984) 3H-SCH 23390 has the characteristics of a dopamine receptor ligand in the rat central nervous system. Eur J Pharmacol 106:211–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz DW, Stanford EJ, Wyrick SB, Mailman RB (1985) Binding of 3H-SCH 23390 in rat brain: regional distribution, inhibition by competing ligands, and effects of assay conditions suggest interactions at D1-like dipamine receptors. J Neurochem 45: 1601–1611

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeman P (1980) Brain dopamine receptors. Pharmacol Rev 32:229–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiler MP, Markstein R (1984) Further characterization of structural requirements for agonists at the striatal dopamine D2 receptor and a comparison with those at the striatal dopamine D1 receptor. Mol Pharmacol 26:452–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Oene JC, de Vries JB, Dijkstra D, Renkema RJW, Tepper PG, Horn AS (1984) In vivo dopamine autoreceptor selectivity appears to be critically dependent upon the aromatic hydroxyl position in a series of N,N-disubstituted 2-aminotetralins. Eur J Pharmacol 102:101–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerink BHC, Mulder TBA (1981) Determination of picomole amounts of dopamine, noradrenaline, 3,4-dihydroxy-phenylalanine, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, homovanillic acid and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid in nervous tissue after one-step purification on Sephadex G10, using high-performance liquid chromatography with a novel type of electrochemical detection. J Neurochem 36:1449–1462

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rollema, H., Feenstra, M.G.P., Grol, C.J. et al. S(−)DP-5,6-ADTN as an in vivo dopamine receptor ligand: Relation between displacement by dopamine agonists and their pharmacological effects. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 332, 338–345 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00500084

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00500084

Key words

Navigation