Skip to main content
Log in

The surface tension of liquid pure aluminium and aluminium-magnesium alloy

  • Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the results of several experiments designed to further illustrate the recent findings of the present authors according to which, if a virtually leak-fee maximum bubble pressure system is used to measure the surface tension of liquid aluminium, a surface tension around 1100 mJ m−2 is first obtained, decreasing to the oxidized value (around 865 mJ m−2) as the experiment proceeds and oxygen enters the system mainly through the capillary walls. The peculiarities and difficulties inherent to the maximum bubble pressure method are illustrated. For instance, a study of the time needed for the surface tension to decrease to the oxidized value as a function of temperature reveals the important role played by the vapour pressure in the process. This is further illustrated by considering Al-Mg alloys, as magnesium has a different heat of vaporization and a much larger vapour pressure than aluminium at the measuring temperatures. Results for the changes in density and surface tension for the oxidized and unoxidized cases induced by magnesium (up to 8 wt%) are also presented and compared to previous data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Goumiri and J. C. Joud, Acta Metall. 30 (1982) 1397 and references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Pamies, C. Garcia-Cordovilla and E. Louis, Scripta Metall. 18 (1984) 869.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Lang, Aluminium 49 (1973) 231 and references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. G. White, Metall. Rev. 13 (1968) 73.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. C. Allen, in “Liquid Metals” edited by S. Z. Beer (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1972) p. 161.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. D. Hondros, in “Physicochemical Measurements in Metals Research”, Vol. IV, Part 2, edited by R. A. Rapp (Interscience, Wiley, New York, 1970) pp. 293–348.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Lang, J. Inst. Met. 101 (1973) 300.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Idem, Aluminium 50 (1974) 731.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Cantor, Ann. Physik 283 (1982) 399.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Shrödinger, ibid. 46 (1915) 413.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. E. Honig and D. A. Kramer, in “Physicochemical Measurements in Metals Research”, Vol. IV, Part 1, edited by R. A. Rapp (Interscience Wiley, New York, 1970) pp. 505–531.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. J. Smithells, (ed), in “Metals Reference Book” 5th Ed. (Butterworths, London, 1976) p. 231.

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. I. Maissel and R. Glang, (eds), in “Handbook of Thin Film Technology” (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970) pp. 2–39.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. Chacón, F. Flores and G. Navascues, J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 14 (1984) 1587.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. M. Korol'kov, Otdelenie, Teknicheskik Nauk 2 (1965) 35.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. Pelzel, Berg.-u. Hütternmänn Monatsh. Leoben 93 247.

  17. Idem ibid. 94 (1949) 10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garcia-Cordovilla, C., Louis, E. & Pamies, A. The surface tension of liquid pure aluminium and aluminium-magnesium alloy. J Mater Sci 21, 2787–2792 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00551490

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00551490

Keywords

Navigation