Skip to main content
Log in

Models and lawlikeness

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Do analogical models ever play an essential role in scientific explanation and confirmation, or is their role (at most) heuristic? For many years scientists and philosophers have debated this question. I argue that such models may sometimes play an essential role. My argument is based on a proposal to augment Goodman's theory of projection in order to make it easier for novel predicates (extensions) to acquire entrenchment. The heart of this proposal is the claim that analogical models may, under certain conditions, be the medium whereby entrenchment is passed from well established predicates to new and unfamiliar ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roper, J.E. Models and lawlikeness. Synthese 52, 313–323 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869199

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869199

Keywords

Navigation