Abstract
A folded surface can be represented by the orientation of normals to the surface measured at several locations. When plotted on the unit sphere, the pattern of normals determines the type of fold. Poles from a cylindrical fold give a great circle on the unit sphere, whereas poles of a circular conical fold give a small circle, and poles from an elliptical conical fold give the projection of an ellipse onto the surface of the sphere. Several statistical tests that appear in the literature for classifying folds are discussed and compared. All but one of the tests use quantities obtained from an iterative least-squares procedure that fits the appropriate curve on the sphere. The classification procedure is illustrated with folds from the Canadian Rocky Mountains and uses for examples a cylindrical fold and a circular conical fold from the Smoky River coal field near Grande Cache, Alberta, and an elliptical conical fold near Jasper, Alberta. This methodology has resulted in new coal reserves in the Grande Cache area.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bevington, P. R., 1969, Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences: McGraw-Hill, New York, 336 p.
Charlesworth, H. A. K.; Langenberg, C. W.; Ramsden, J., 1976, Determining Axes, Axial Planes and Sections of Macroscopic Folds: Can. J. Earth Sci., v. 13, n. 1, p. 54–65.
Cruden, D. M. and Charlesworth, H. A. K., 1972, Observations on the Numerical Determination of Axes of Cylindrical and Conical Folds: Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., v. 83, n. 7, p. 2019–2024.
Gray, N. H.; Geiser, P. A.; and Geiser, J. R., 1980, On the Least-Squares Fit of Small and Great Circles to Spherically Projected Orientation Data: Math. Geol., v. 12, p. 173–184.
Kelker, D. and Langenberg, C. W., 1976, A Mathematical Model for Orientation Data from Macroscopic Cylindrical Folds: Math. Geol., v. 8, p. 549–559.
Kelker, D. and Langenberg, C. W., 1982, A Mathematical Model for Orientation Data from Macroscopic Conical Folds: Math. Geol., v. 14, p. 289–307.
Kelker, D. and Langenberg, C. W., 1987, A Mathematical Model for Orientation Data from Macroscopic Elliptical Conical Folds: Math. Geol., v. 19, p. 729–743.
Kendall, M. G. and Stuart, A., 1973, The Advanced Theory of Statistics, v. 2: Hafner Publishing Co., New York, p. 723.
Langenberg, C. W., 1985, The Geometry of Folded and Thrusted Rocks in the Rocky Mountain Foothills near Grande Cache, Alberta: Can. J. Earth Sci., v. 22, p. 1711–1719.
Langenberg, C. W.; Kalkreuth, W.; and Wrightson, C. B., 1987, Deformed Lower Cretaceous Coal Bearing Strata of the Grande Cache Area, Alberta: Alberta Research Council, Bulletin 56, p. 54.
Stauffer, M. R., 1964, The geometry of conical folds: New Zealand J. Geol. Geophys., v. 7, p. 340–347.
Stesky, R. M., 1985, Least Squares Fitting of a Non-Circular Cone: Comput. Geosci., v. 11, p. 357–358.
Stockmal, G. S. and Spang, J. H., 1982, A Method for the Distinction of Circular Conical from Cylindrical Folds: Can. J. Earth Sci., v. 19, p. 1101–1105.
Watson, G. S., 1960, Further Significance Tests on a Sphere: Biometrika, v. 47, p. 87–91.
Watson, G. S., 1965, Equatorial Distributions on a Sphere: Biometrika, v. 52, p. 193–201.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kelker, D., Langenberg, C.W. Statistical classification of macroscopic folds as cylindrical, circular conical, or elliptical conical. Math Geol 20, 717–730 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00890587
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00890587