Abstract
Several species of monophagous jack pine sawflies (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae) were tested in the field and by electroantennograms (EAG) for activity toward the optical isomers of a pine sawfly sex pheromone, the acetate and propionate esters of 3,7-dimethylpentadecan-2-ol.Neodiprion rugifrons andNeodiprion dubiosus were attracted to a mixture of the propionate esters of the 2S,3R,7R and 2S,3R,7S isomers, whereasNeodiprion swainei was attracted to the 2S,3S,7S propionate isomer. Samples containing the 2S,3R,7S propionate isomer elicited the strongest EAG responses in these three species andNeodiprion nigroscutum. The 2S,3S,7S propionate isomer was equally active (EAG) in the case ofN. swainei.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atwood, C. E. 1961. Present status of the sawfly family Diprionidae (Hymenoptera) in Ontario.Proc. Entomol. Soc. Ont. 91:205–215.
Becker, G.G., andBenjamin, D.M. 1964. Biology of the Swaine jack-pine sawfly in Wisconsin.Can. Entomol. 96:589–599.
Becker, G.C., andBenjamin, D.M. 1967. Biology ofNeodiprion nigroscutum (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae) in Wisconsin.Can. Entomol. 99:146–159.
Becker, G.C., Wilkinson, R.C., andBenjamin, D.M. 1966. The taxonomy ofNeodiprion rugifrons andN. dubiosus (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinoidea: Diprionidae).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 59:173–178.
Hetrick, L.A. 1956. Life history studies of five species ofNeodiprion sawflies.Forest Sci. 2:181–185.
Jewett, D.M., Matsumura, F., andCoppel, H.C. 1976. Sex pheromone specificity in the pine sawflies: Interchange of acid moieties in an ester.Science 192:51–53.
Jewett, D.M., Matsumura, F., andCoppel, H.C. 1977. A simple system for recording electro-antennograms from male pine sawflies.J. Electrophysiol. Tech. 5:23–28.
Jewett, D., Matsumura, F., andCoppel, H.C. 1978. Preparation and use of sex attractants for four species of pine sawflies.J. Chem. Ecol. 4:277–287.
Kikukawa, T., Matsumura, F., Kraemer, M., Coppel, H.C., andTai, A. 1982. Field attractiveness of chirally defined synthetic attractants to males ofDiprion similis andGilpinia frutetorum.J. Chem. Ecol. 8:301–314.
Kikukawa, T., Matsumura, F., Olaifa, J., Kraemer, M., Coppel, H.C. andTai, A. 1983. Field evaluation of chiral isomers of the sex pheromone of the European pine sawfly,Neodiprion sertifer.J. Chem. Ecol. 9:673–693.
Kraemer, M.E., andCoppel, H.C. 1983. Hybridization of jack pine feeding sawflies (Diprionidae: Neodiprion). U.W. Forest Res. Notes No. 252, 3 pp.
Kraemer, M.E., Coppel, H.C., Matsumura, F., Kikukawa, T., andMori, K. 1979. Field responses of the white pine sawfly,Neodiprion pinetum, to optical isomers of sawfly sex pheromones.Environ. Entomol. 8:519–520.
Kraemer, M.E., Coppel, H.C., Matsumura, F., Wilkinson, R.C., andKikukawa, T. 1981. Field and electroantennogram responses of red-headed pine sawfly,Neodiprion lecontei (Fitch), to optical isomers of sawfly sex pheromones,J. Chem. Ecol. 7:1063–1071.
Matsumura, F., Tai, A., Coppel, H.C., andImaida, M. 1979. Chiral specificity of the pheromone of the red-headed pine sawfly,Neodiprion lecontei.J. Chem. Ecol. 5:237–249.
Mori, K., Tamada, S., andMatsui, M. 1978. Stereo controlled synthesis of all of the four possible stereoisomers oferythro-3,7-dimethylpentadecan-2-yl acetate and propionate, the sex pheromone of the pine sawflies. Tetrahedron Lett. No. 10, pp. 901–904.
Ross, H.H. 1955. The taxonomy and evolution of the sawfly genusNeodiprion.Forest Sci. 1:196–209.
Tai, A., Imaida, M., Oda, T., andWatanabe, H. 1978. Synthesis of optically active common precursor of sex pheromone of pine sawflies.Chem. Lett. 1978:61.
Wilkinson, R.C., Becker, G.C., andBenjamin, D.M. 1966. The biology ofNeodiprion rugifrons (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae), a sawfly infesting jack pine in Wisconsin.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 59:786–792.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kraemer, M.E., Coppel, H.C., Matsumura, F. et al. Field and electroantennogram responses to sex pheromone optical isomers by monophagous jack pine sawflies (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae). J Chem Ecol 10, 983–995 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987507
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987507