Abstract
Person perception tasks involving nonverbal communication have a mystified reputation. It is frequently argued that nonverbal cues are accurately, but only unconsciously, perceived. This may explain the frequent response of judges who, when asked to decode a sample of nonverbal behavior, reply that it was “just a hunch”—i.e., show little or no awareness of how they arrived at a judgment, even a correct one. Two alternative models, the “Unconsciousness” hypothesis and the “Inarticulation” hypothesis are posited to describe the possible relationship between accuracy and awareness. Two studies are reported on the relationship between accuracy and awareness, both using the Interpersonal Perception Task (IPT). In the first study, the IPT was given to a sample of 476 undergraduates. Accuracy was measured by how many of the 30 IPT questions these judges answered correctly. Global awareness was indexed by having each judge guess how many of the 30 scenes they had answered correctly. In this coarse analysis, the accuracy-awareness relationship was positive but weak. A second experiment was conducted to produce more fine-grained tests of the accuracy-awareness relationship. Different versions of the IPT were presented to 134 undergraduates. Judges given each version of the IPT were asked to indicate their degree of confidence in each one of their answers. This second experiment found a positive, substantial relationship between accuracy and awareness, and this relationship was particularly strong when analyzed across experimental conditions as a whole. These findings support the “Inarticulation” hypothesis, and cast doubt on the “Unconsciousness” hypothesis. Implications for an emerging understanding of how nonverbal communication is processed are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archer, D. (1980).How to expand your social intelligence quotient. New York: M. Evans & Co. (Dutton-Elsevier).
Archer, D., & Akert, R.M. (1977). Words and everything else: Verbal and nonverbal cues in social interaction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35 443–449.
Archer, D., & Akert, R.M. (1980). The encoding of meaning: A test of three theories of social interaction.Sociological Inquiry, 50 393–419.
Archer, D., & Akert, R.M. (in press),The interpretation of behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Archer, D., Smith, H., & Wilkens, S. (1990).How does interpretation work? Experimental tests of three theoretical models. (Unpublished manuscript).
Archer, D., & Costanzo, M. (1988a).The Interpersonal Perception Task (IPT) Berkeley, CA: University of California Extension Media Center.
Archer, D., & Costanzo, M. (1988b).A Guide to the Interpersonal Perception Task (IPT) for Instructors and Researchers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Extension Media Center.
Blake, M. (1973). Prediction of recognition when recall fails: Exploring the feeling of knowing phenomenon.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12 311–319.
Bothwell, R., Deffenbacher, K., & Brigham, J. (1987). Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revisited.Journal of Applied Psychology, 72 691–695.
Costanzo, M., & Archer, D. (1989). Interpreting the expressive behavior of others: The Interpersonal Perception Task (IPT).Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13 225–245.
DePaulo, B., & Pfeifer, R. (1986). On-the-job experience and skill at detecting deception.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16 249–267.
DePaulo, B.M., Rosenthal, R., Green, C.R., & Rosenkrantz, J. (1982). Diagnosing deceptive and mixed messages from verbal and nonverbal cues.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18 433–446.
Ekman, P. (1985).Telling lies. New York: Norton.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. (1969). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception.Psychiatry, 32 88–106.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. (1972). Hand movements.Journal of Communication, 22 353–374.
Greening, L., & Dollinger, S. (1985). Confidence at recognizing psychological implications.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23 311–313.
Johnson, H.G., Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. (1975). Communicative body movements: American emblems.Semiotica, 15 335–353.
Knapp, M.L. (1978).Nonverbal communication in human interaction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Nisbett, R., & Wilson, T. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review, 84 231–259.
Oskamp, S. (1982). Overconfidence in case-study judgments. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic & A. Tversky, (Eds.),Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenthal, R., Hall, J.S., DiMatteo, M.R., Rogers, P., & Archer, D. (1979).Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: A profile approach to the measurement of differential abilities. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Sapir, E.A. (1949). Communication. InSelected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture, and personality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We wish to thank Robin Akert and Bob Rosenthal for helpful advice and inspiration.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, H.J., Archer, D. & Costanzo, M. “Just a hunch”: Accuracy and awareness in person perception. J Nonverbal Behav 15, 3–18 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00997764
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00997764