Skip to main content
Log in

Effective attraction radius

A method for comparing species attractants and determining densities of flying insects

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The catches of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) were compared between attractive traps releasing semiochemicals and passive traps (cylindrical sticky screens hung, at 10 heights of 0.7–11.5 m, on poles). A central attractive-trap pole was surrounded by three passive-trap poles spaced 50 or 100 m away at the apices of an equilateral triangle. The catches ofTomicus piniperda and other scolytid species on the attractive-trap pole baited with host monoterpenes, or the catches ofIps typographus attracted to synthetic pheromone, were compared to passive trap catches in a Scots pine forest or in a Norway spruce clear-cut, respectively. Information about flight height distributions of the above scolytid species, andHylurgops palliatus, Cryphalus abietis, Pityogenes chalcographus, P. quadridens, P. bidentatus, andTrypodendron domesticum were obtained on the passive and attractive trap poles. A new method is presented for determining the densities of flying insects based on the passive trap's dimensions and catch, duration of test, and speed of insect. Also, a novel concept, the effective attraction radius (EAR), is presented for comparing attractants of species, which is independent of insect density, locality, or duration of test. The EAR is obtained by the ratio of attractive and passive trap catches and the dimensions of the passive trap, and thus should correlate positively with the strength of the attractant and the distance of attraction. EARs are determined from catch data ofT. piniperda andI. typographus as well as from the data of previous investigations on the same or other bark beetles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, T.C., andRoelofs, W.L. 1981. Initiation and termination of oriental fruit moth male response to pheromone concentration in the field.Environ. Entomol. 10:211–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borden, J.H., Hunt, D.W.A., Miller, D.R., andSlessor, K.N. 1986. Orientation in forest Coleoptera: An uncertain outcome of responses by individual beetles to variable stimuli, pp. 97–109,in T.L. Payne, M.C. Birch, and C.E.J. Kennedy (eds.). Mechanisms in Insect Olfaction. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossert, W.H., andWilson, E.O. 1963. The analysis of olfactory communication among animals.J. Theor. Biol. 5:443–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnell, D.G. 1973. A dispersal-aggregation model for mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine stands.Res. Popul. Ecol. 19:99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, J.A. 1983. Sex-specific responses to aggregation pheromone: Regulation of colonization density in the bark beetleIps paraconfusus.J. Chem. Ecol. 9:129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, J.A. 1987. Interactions of pheromone component odor plumes of western pine beetle.J. Chem. Ecol. 13:2143–2157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, J.A., Lanne, B.S., Löfqvist, L., Schlyter, F., andBergström, G. 1985. Olfactory recognition of host-tree susceptibility by pine shoot beetles.Naturwissenschaften 72:324–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, K.J., Swigar, A.A., Silverstein, R.M., Borden, J.H., andStokkink, E. 1974. Sulcatol: Population aggregation pheromone in the scolytid beetle,Gnathotrichus sulcatus.J. Insect Physiol. 20:1895–1900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J.A., andKinghorn, J.M. 1958. Studies of flight and attack activity of the ambrosia beetle,Trypodendron lineatum (Oliv.), and other scolytids.Can. Entomol. 90:362–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuthbert, R.A., andPeacock, J.W. 1975. Attraction ofScolytus multistriatus to pheromonebaited traps at different heights.Environ. Entomol. 4:889–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duelli, Von P., Studer, M., andNap, W. 1986. Der Borkenkäferflug auserhalb des Waldes.J. Appl. Entomol. 102:139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkinton, J.S., andCardé, R.T. 1984. Odor dispersion, pp. 73–91,in W.J. Bell and R.T. Cardé (eds.). Chemical Ecology of Insects. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsse, E., andSolbreck, CH. 1985. Migration in the bark beetleIps typographies L.: Duration, timing and height of flight. Z.Angew. Entomol. 100:47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gara, R.I., andVite, J.P. 1962. Studies on the flight patterns of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in second growth ponderosa pine forests.Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 21:275–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynum, E.G., andBerryman, A.A. 1980.Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): Pre-aggregation landing and gallery initiation on lodgepole pine.Can. Entomol. 112:185–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leos-Martinez, Granovsky, T.A., Williams, H.J., Vinson, S.B., andBurkholder, W.E. 1986. Estimation of aerial density of the lesser grain borer (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) in a warehouse using dominicalure traps.J. Econ. Entomol. 79:1134–1138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, K., andKawasaki, K. 1977. The active space of theSpodoptera litura (F.) sex pheromone.Appl. Entomol. Zool. 12:162–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijholt, W.W. 1983. Flight behavior of ambrosia beetles near free-standing sticky-screen traps.Can. For. Serv. Res. Notes 3:8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, T.L. 1986. Olfaction and vision in host finding by a bark beetle, pp. 111–116,in T.L. Payne, M.C. Birch, and C.E.J. Kennedy (eds.). Mechanisms in Insect Olfaction. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffa, K.F., andBerryman, A.A. 1980. Flight responses and host selection by bark beetles, pp. 213–233,in A.A. Berryman and L. Safranyik (eds.). Dispersal of Forest Insects: Evaluation, Theory and Management Implications. Proceedings IUFRO Conference, Cooperative Extension Service, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlyter, F., Byers, J.A., andLöfqvist, J. 1987. Attraction to pheromone sources of different quantity, quality, and spacing: Density-regulation mechanisms in bark beetleIps typographus.J. Chem. Ecol. 13:1503–1523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, R.F. 1980. Dispersal of pine engraver beetles in second growth ponderosa pine forests, pp. 41–50,in A.A. Berryman and L. Safranyik (eds.). Dispersal of Forest Insects: Evaluation, Theory and Management Implications. Proceedings IUFRO Conference, Cooperative Extension Service, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, T.L., andMcLean, J.A. 1984. The effect of height of pheromone-baited traps on catches of the ambrosia beetle,Trypodendron lineatum.J. Entomol. Soc. B.C. 81:17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solbreck, C. 1985. Insect migration strategies and population dynamics.Contrib. Mar. Sci. Suppl. 27:641–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilden, P.E., Bedard, W.D., Wood, D.L., Lindahl, K.Q., andRauch, P.A. 1979. Trapping the western pine beetle at and near a source of synthetic attractive pheromone: Effects of trap size and position.J. Chem. Ecol. 5:519–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilden, P.E., Bedard, W.D., Lindahl, K.Q., Jr., andWood, D.L. 1983. TrappingDendroctonus brevicomis: Changes in attractant release rate, dispersion of attractant, and silhouette.J. Chem. Ecol. 9:311–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vité, J.P., andGara, R.I. 1962. Volatile attractants from ponderosa pine attacked by bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 21:251–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigglesworth, V.B. 1972. The Principles of Insect Physiology, pp. 235–237. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Byers, J.A., Anderbrant, O. & Löqvist, J. Effective attraction radius. J Chem Ecol 15, 749–765 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014716

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014716

Key words

Navigation