Abstract
Four psychological perspectives need to be considered in response to the Richard Bonnie outlook on competence for execution. The first perspective is the degree to which the task itself is ambiguous and thus allows individual clinicians' values to leak through. The second perspective is that prisoners' choices to opt for execution instead of appeal are murky and often irrational. The third perspective is that even rational decisions for execution instead of appeal are often not founded on informed judgments, in part because of the situational influences of living on death row. The fourth perspective is that clinicians' judgments to participate in such legal-psychological activities are not only a matter of individual morality but also part of evolving professional ethics.
References
Board of Social and Ethical Responsibility in Psychology (1989). Agenda: Meeting of May 5–7, 1989. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Bonnie, R. (1989). Dilemmas in administering the death penalty: Conscientious abstention, professional ethics, and the needs of the legal system.Law and Human Behavior, 14, 67–90.
Brodsky, S. L. (1988).The psychology of adjustment and well-being. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry (1974).Misuse of psychiatry in the criminal courts: Competency to stand trial. 8, Report No. 89.
Johnson, R., & Toch, H. (1982).The pains of imprisonment. Beverly Hills: Sage.
McGarry, A. L. (1973). Competency to stand trial and mental illness.Crime and Delinquency Issues, A Monograph Series, Rockville, Maryland: NIMH. DHEW Publication No. (HSM) 73-9105.
Robey, A. (1965). Criteria for competency to stand trial: A checklist for psychiatrists.American Journal of Psychiatry, 122, 616–623.
Roesch, R., & Golding, S. L. (1980).Competency to stand trial. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
Slovenko, R. (1973).Psychiatry and law. Boston: Little, Brown.
Smith, M. L., Glass, G. V., & Miller, T. I. (1980).The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Brodsky, S.L. Professional ethics and professional morality in the assessment of competence for execution. Law Hum Behav 14, 91–97 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055791
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055791