Skip to main content
Log in

The clinical significance of gall-bladder non-visualization in cholescintigraphy of patients with choledochal cysts

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intravenous radionuclide cholescintigraphy (IVRC) provides a very specific picture for choledochal cysts. However, the clinical significance of the non-visualization of the gall-bladder (GB) activity in these cases is unclear. In this study, we reviewed 27 patients with choledochal cysts who underwent IVRC within 7 days prior to operation and correlated the GB findings on IVRC with the histopathological results. In 18 of the 27 patients (66.7%), there was non-visualization of the GB at 4 h post injection. Among these, two had histopathological features of acute cholecystitis (AC), 11 had chronic cholecystitis (CC), and five had normal GBs. In the other nine patients with visualization of the GB, there were five cases of CC and four normal GBs. If we apply the finding of non-visualization of the GB at 4 h post injection as the criterion for the diagnosis of AC, the diagnostic accuracy was only 40.7% (11/27). We concluded that: (1) GB disease (AC and CC) was common (66.7%: 7.4% and 59.3% respectively) in choledochal cyst patients. (2) Non-visualization of the GB on IVRC did not necessarily indicate AC in choledochal cyst cases, and the diagnostic accuracy was low. (3) GB disease is not the only cause of GB non-visualization on IVRC. A huge choledochal cyst causing a mass or reservoir effect may be a cause of GB compression and result in non-visualization of the GB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Flanigan DP. Biliary cyst.Ann Surg 1975; 182: 635–643.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yamaguchi M. Congenital choledochal cyst: analysis of 1433 patients in the Japanese literature.Am J Surg 1980; 140: 653–657.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang MJ, Liaw YF. Intravenous cholescintigraphy using Tc-99m labeled agents in the diagnosis of choledochal cyst.J Nucl Med 1982; 23: 113–116.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Padhy AK, Gopinath PG, Basu AK, et al. Hepatobiliary scintigraphy in congenital cystic dilatation of biliary tract.Clin Nucl Med 1985; 10: 703–707.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Camponovo E, Buck DL, Drane WE. Scintigraphic features of choledochal cyst.J Nucl Med 1989; 30: 622–628.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kao PF, Huang MJ, Liaw YF, et al. Choledochal cyst: findings of intravenous radionuclide cholescintigraphy, sonography, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.J Formos Med Assoc 1989; 88: 950–954.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Babbit DP. Congenital choledochal cyst. New etiological concept based on anomalous relationships of the common bile duct and pancreatic bulb.Ann Radiol 1969; 12: 231–240.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Papanicolaou N, Abramson SJ, Teele RL, et al. Specific preoperative diagnosis of choledochal cysts by combined sonography and hepatobiliary scintigraphy.Ann Radiol 1985; 28: 276–282.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hadidi A. Type I and III choledochal cyst preoperative diagnosis by ultrasound.Am J Dis Child 1983; 137: 663–665.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kinoshida H, Nagata E, Hirohashi K, et al. Carcinoma of the gallbladder with an anomalous connection between the choledochus and the pancreatic duct.Cancer 1984; 54: 762–769.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nagata E, Sakai K, Kinoshita H, et al. The relation between carcinoma of the gallbladder and anomalous connection between the choledochus and the pancreatic duct.Ann Surg 1985; 202: 182–190.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamaguchi S, Koga A, Matsumoto S, Tanaka M, Nakayama F. Anomalous junction of pancreaticobiliary duct without congential choledochal cyst: a possible risk factor for gallbladder cancer.Am J Gastroenterol 1987; 82: 20–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yoshida H, Itai Y, Minami M, Kokubo T, Ohtomo K, Kuroda A. Biliary malignancies occurring in choledochal cyst.Radiology 1989; 173: 389–392.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Misra SP, Dwivedi M. Pancreaticobiliary ductal union.Gut 1990; 31: 1144–1149.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Todani T, Watanabe Y, Fujii M, et al. Carcinoma arising from the bile duct in choledochal cysts and anomalous arrangement of the pancreatobiliary ductal union.Biliary Tract Pancreas 1985; 6: 525–535.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Voyles CR, Smadja C, Shands WC, et al. Carcinoma in choledochal cysts — age related.Arch Surg 1983; 118: 986–988.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lecklitner ML, Rosen PR, Nusynowitz ML. Cholescintigraphy: gallbladder non-visualization secondary to neoplasm.J Nucl Med 1981; 22: 699–700.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Velchik MG, Makler PT, Alavi A. Gallbladder carcinoma: a cause of the distended photon-deficient gallbladder in cholescintigraphy.Clin Nucl Med 1984; 9: 137–138.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Colletti PM, Ralls PW, Siegel ME. Cholescintigraphy in gallbladder carcinoma.Clin Nucl Med 1986; 11: 270–273.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nagata E, Sakai K, Kinoshita H, et al. Choledochal cyst: complications of anomalous connection between the choledochus and pancreatic duct and carcinoma of the biliary tract.World J Surg 1986; 10: 102–110.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Weissmann HS, Frank MS, Bernstein LH. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of acute cholecystitis with99mTc-HIDA cholescintigraphy.AJR 1979; 132: 523–528.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Worthen Nj, Uszler JM, Funamura JL. Cholecystitis: prospective evaluation of sonography and99mTc-HIDA cholescintigraphy.AJR 1981; 137: 973–978.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Weissmann HS, Badia J, Sugarman LA. Spectrum of99mTc-IDA cholescintigraphy patterns in acute cholecystitis.Radiology 1981; 138: 167–175.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Samuels BI, Freitas JE, Bree RL. A comparison of radionuclide hepatobiliary imaging and real-time ultrasound for the detection of acute cholecystitis.Radiology 1983; 147: 207–210.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Freitas JE, Coleman RE, Nagle CE, Bree RL, Krewer KD, Gross MD. Influence of scan and pathologic criteria on the specificity of cholescintigraphy.J Nucl Med 1983; 24: 876–879.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fonseca C, Greenberg D, Rosenthal L, Arzoumanian A. Assessment of the utility of gallbladder imaging with99mTc-IDA.Clin Nucl Med 1978; 3: 437–441.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Samuels BJ, Freitas JE, Gross MD. A pragmatic review of gallbladder imaging.Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1985; 6: 156–171.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Klingensmith WC, Turner WM. Cholescintigraphy for acute cholecystitis: false positive results caused by chronic cholecystitis.Gastrointest Radiol 1990; 15: 129–132.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kao, PF., Huang, MJ., Tzen, KY. et al. The clinical significance of gall-bladder non-visualization in cholescintigraphy of patients with choledochal cysts. Eur J Nucl Med 23, 1468–1472 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01254470

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01254470

Key words

Navigation