Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ultraviolet microbeam irradiations of spindle fibres in crane-fly spermatocytes and newt epithelial cells: Resolution of previously conflicting observations

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In order to resolve apparent differences in reported experiments, we directly compared the effects of ultraviolet (UV) microbeam irradiations on the behaviour of spindle fibres in newt epithelial cells and crane-fly spermatocytes, using the same apparatus for both cell types. This work represents the first time that irradiated crane-fly spermatocytes have been followed using a high-NA objective and video-enhancement of images. In both cell types, irradiation of a kinetochore fibre in metaphase produced an area of reduced birefringence (ARB), known to be devoid of spindle microtubules (MTs). Subsequently the kinetochore-ward edge of the ARB moved poleward with average velocities of 0.5 μm/min (n=20) in spermatocytes and 1.1 μm/min (n=6) in epithelial cells. The poleward edge of the ARB rapidly disappeared when viewed using a ×100, high-NA objective but generally remained visible when viewed with a ×32, low-NA objective; this difference suggests that MTs poleward from the ARB disperse vertically out of the narrow depth of field of the ×100 objective but that many remain encompassed by that of the ×32 objective. The primary difference in response between the two cell types was in the behaviour of the spindle poles after an ARB formed. In spermatocytes the spindle maintained its original length whereas in epithelial cells the pole on the irradiated side very soon moved towards the chromosomes, after which the other pole did the same and a much shortened functional metaphase spindle was formed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aist JR, Berns MW (1981) Mechanics of chromosome separation during mitosis inFusarium (fungi imperfecti): new evidence from ultrastructural and laser microbeam experiments. J Cell Biol 91: 446–458

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Bayles CJ, Tao W, Berns MW (1991) Direct experimental evidence for the existence, structural basis and function of astral forces during anaphase B in vivo. J Cell Sci 100: 279–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajer A, Molé-Bajer J (1961) UV microbeam irradiation of chromosomes during mitosis in endosperm Exp Cell Res 25: 251–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom W, Zirkle RE, Uretz RB (1955) Irradiation of parts of individual cells. III. Effects of chromosomal and extrachromosomal irradiation on chromosome movements. Ann N Y Acad Sci 59: 503–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Czaban BB, Forer A (1994) Rhodamine-phalloidin and anti-tubulin staining of spindle fibres that were irradiated with an ultraviolet microbeam. Protoplasma 178: 18–27

    Google Scholar 

  • — —, Bajer AS (1993) Ultraviolet microbeam irradiation of chromosomal spindle fibres inHaemanthus katherinae endosperm. I. Behaviour of the irradiated region. J Cell Sci 105: 571–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Forer A (1965) Local reduction of spindle fiber birefringence in livingNephrotoma suturalis (Loew) spermatocytes induced by ultraviolet microbeam irradiation. J Cell Biol 25 (no 1, pt 2): 95–117

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1966) Characterization of the mitotic traction system, and evidence that birefringent spindle fibers neither produce nor transmit force for chromosome movement. Chromosoma 19: 44–98

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1982) Crane fly spermatocytes and spermatids: a system for studying cytoskeletal components. Methods Cell Biol 25 B: 227–252

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1988) Do anaphase chromosomes chew their way to the pole or are they pulled by actin? J Cell Sci 91: 449–453

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1991) In ultraviolet microbeam irradiations, characteristics of the monochromator and lamp affect the spectral composition of the ultraviolet light and probably the biological results. J Cell Sci 98: 415–422

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Wilson PJ (1994) A model for chromosome movement during mitosis. Protoplasma 179: 95–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon GW (1980) The control of chromosome motion: UV microbeam irradiation of kinetochore fibers. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays TS, Salmon ED (1990) Poleward force at the kinetochore in metaphase depends on the number of kinetochore microtubules. J Cell Biol 110: 391–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes K, Forer A, Wilson P, Leggiadro C (1988) Ultraviolet microbeam irradiation of microtubules in vitro. J Cell Sci 91: 469–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoué S (1986) Video microscopy. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Izutsu K (1961) Effects of ultraviolet microbeam irradiation upon division in grasshopper spermatocytes. II. Results of irradiation during metaphase and anaphase I. Mie Med J 11: 213–232

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1988) Changes in the chromosomal spindle (kinetochore) fibers and the behaviour of bivalent chromosomes in grasshopper spermatocytes after irradiation of the kinetochores with an ultraviolet microbeam. Protoplasma Suppl 1: 122–132

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Sato H (1992) Rapid backward movement of anaphase chromosomes whose kinetochore fibers were cut by ultraviolet microbeam irradiation. Biol Cell 76: 339–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie RJ, Pickett-Heaps JD (1983) Ultraviolet microbeam irradiations of mitoic diatoms: investigation of spindle elongation. J Cell Biol 96: 548–561

    Google Scholar 

  • — — (1984) Spindle microtubule dynamics following ultraviolet-microbeam irradiations of mitotic diatoms. Cell 36: 717–727

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil PA, Berns MW (1981) Chromosome behavior after laser microirradiation of a single kinetochore in mitotic PtK2 cells. J Cell Biol 88: 543–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchison TJ, Salmon ED (1992) Poleward kinetochore fiber movement occurs during both metaphase and anaphase-A in newt lung cell mitosis. J Cell Biol 119: 569–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakanishi YH, Kato H (1965) Unusual movement of the daughter chromosome group in telophasic cells following the exposure to ultraviolet microbeam irradiation. Cytologia 30: 213–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett-Heaps JD (1991) Cell division in diatoms. Int Rev Cytol 123: 63–107

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Forer A, Spurck T (1996) Rethinking anaphase: where “Pac-Man” fails and why a role for the spindle matrix is likely. Protoplasma 192: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieder CL, Hard R (1990) Newt lung epithelial cells: cultivation, use, and advantages for biomedical research. Int Rev Cytol 122: 153–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillers PJ, Forer A (1983) Action spectrum for changes in spindle fibre birefringence after ultraviolet microbeam irradiations of single chromosomal spindle fibres in crane-fly spermatocytes. J Cell Sci 62: 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Wise D, Forer A (1983) Prometaphase forces towards opposite spindle poles are not independent: an on/off control system is identified by ultraviolet microbeam irradiations. J Cell Sci 64: 69–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder JA, Armstrong L, Stonington GO, Spurck TP, Pickett-Heaps JD (1991) UV-microbeam irradiations of the mitotic spindle: spindle forces and structural analysis of lesions. Eur J Cell Biol 55: 122–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurck TP, Stonington GO, Snyder JA, Pickett-Heaps JD, Bajer A, Molè-Bajer J (1990) UV microbeam irradiations of the mitotic spindle. II. Spindle fiber dynamics and force production. J Cell Biol 111: 1505–1518

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Forer A, Pickett-Heaps JD (1997) Ultraviolet microbeam irradiations of epithelial cell and spermatocyte spindles suggest that forces act on the kinetochore fibre, and are not generated by its disassembly. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 36: 136–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens RE (1965) Analysis of muscle contraction by ultraviolet microbeam disruption of sarcomere structure. J Cell Biol 25 (no 2, pt 2): 129–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonington GO, Spurck TP, Snyder JA, Pickett-Heaps JD (1989) UV microbeam irradiations of the mitotic spindle. I. The UV-microbeam apparatus. Protoplasma 153: 62–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson PJ, Forer A (1988) Ultraviolet microbeam irradiation of chromosomal spindle fibres shears microtubules and permits study of the new free ends in vivo. J Cell Sci 91: 455–468

    Google Scholar 

  • — — (1989) The behaviour of chromosomal spindle fibres irradiated singly or doubly with ultraviolet light. J Cell Sci 94: 625–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Zirkle RE (1957) Partial-cell irradiation. Adv Biol Med Phys 5: 103–146

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Uretz RB (1963) Action spectrum for paling (decrease in refractive index) of ultraviolet-irradiated chromosome segments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 49: 45–52

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biology Department, York University, M3J 1P3, Downsview, Ont, Canada

    Arthur Forer

  2. School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria

    T. Spurck & J. D. Pickett-Heaps

Authors
  1. Arthur Forer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Spurck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. D. Pickett-Heaps
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur Forer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forer, A., Spurck, T. & Pickett-Heaps, J.D. Ultraviolet microbeam irradiations of spindle fibres in crane-fly spermatocytes and newt epithelial cells: Resolution of previously conflicting observations. Protoplasma 197, 230–240 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01288032

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01288032

Keywords

Search

Navigation