Skip to main content
Log in

The videoendoscopic swallowing study: An alternative and partner to the videofluoroscopic swallowing study

  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new, physical examination-based videoendoscopic method of evaluation can enhance considerably the understanding and efficiency of clinicians working with patients with swallowing difficulties. Using the fiberoptic nasolaryngoscope, evaluation of structure and function of palate, pharynx, and larynx, along with sensation of the laryngopharynx, is carried out. Next, patients' swallowing capabilities are assessed as they ingest various food consistencies. This method, formerly called videoendoscopic evaluation of dysphagia (VEED), but perhaps more appropriately termed videoendoscopic swallowing study (VESS) has particular value for patients who cannot undergo the videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS)—for example, because they are bedfast-or those whose swallowing function is changing so rapidly (after a stroke or surgery) as to call for frequent reassessments. This technique is often useful during the initial consultation with new patients complaining of dysphagia, as a “stand alone” method of diagnosis and management. Less frequently, VESS findings, along with patient history, will indicate when VFSS should also be obtained. VESS will orient the examiner to the nature and severity of the problem even in this latter circumstance. In follow-up circumstances, VESS is generally more useful than the VFSS. Case presentations are utilized to illustrate the usefulness of VESS as compared to VFSS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cannon WB, Moser A: The movements of the food in the oesophagus.Am J Physiol 1:435–444, 1898

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mosher HP: X-ray study of movements of the tongue, epiglottis and hyoid bone in swallowing, followed by a discussion of difficulty in swallowing caused by retropharyngeal diverticulum, postcricoid webs and exostoses of cervical vertebrae.Laryngoscope 37:235–255, 1927

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ardran GM, Kemp FH: The protection of the laryngeal airway during swallowing.Br J Radiol 25:406–416, 1952

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bosma JF: Studies of disability of the pharynx resultant from poliomyelitis.Ann ORL 62:529–547, 1953

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ramsey GH, Watson JS, Gramiak R, Weinberg SA: Cinefluorographic analysis of the mechanism of swallowing.Radiology 64:498–518, 1955

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bosma JF: Residual disability of pharyngeal area resulting from poliomyelitis: clinical management of patients.JAMA 165:216–221, 1957

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kirchner JA: Problems in the diagnosis of pharyngeal paresis.Laryngoscope 68:1641–1653, 1958

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shedd DP, Scatliff JA, Kirchner JA: A cineradiographic study of postresectional alterations in oropharyngeal physiology.SGO 110:69–89, 1960

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kirchner JA, Scatliff JH, Dey FL, Shedd DP: The pharynx after laryngectomy: changes in its structure and function.Laryngoscope 73:18–33, 1963

    Google Scholar 

  10. Conley JJ, Seaman W: Function in the crippled laryngopharynx.Ann ORL 72:441–451, 1963

    Google Scholar 

  11. Donner MW, Siegel CI: The evaluation of pharyngeal neuromuscular disorders by cinefluorography.Am J Roentgenol 94:299–307, 1965

    Google Scholar 

  12. Silbiger ML, Pikielney R, Donner MW: Neuromuscular disorders affecting the pharynx: cineradiographic analysis.Invest Radiol 2:442–448, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  13. Litton WB, Leonard JR: Aspiration after partial laryngectomy: cineradiographic studies.Laryngoscope 79:887–908, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hurwitz AL, Nelson JA, Haddad JK: Oropharyngeal dysphagia: manometric and cine esophagraphic findings.Dig Dis 20:313–324, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ekberg O, Sigurjonsson SV: Movement of the epiglottis during deglutition: a cineradiographic study.Gastrointest Radiol 7:101–107, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  16. Logemann J:Evaluation and Treatment of Swallowing Disorders. San Diego: College-Hill Press, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  17. Balfe DM, Helken JP: Contrast evaluation of structural lesions of the pharynx.Curr Prob Diag Radiol 15:77–91, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ, Lydon SB, Stewart ET, Stef JJ, Arndorfer RC: Quantitation of pharyngeal motor function in normal human subjects.J Appl Physiol 39:692–696, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sokol EM, Heitmann P, Wolf BS, Cohen BR: Simultaneous cineradiographic and manometric study of the pharynx, hypopharynx, and cervical esophagus.Gastroenterology 51:960–973, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mendelsohn RS, McConnel FMS: Function in the pharyngoesophageal segment.Laryngoscope 97:483–489, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  21. McConnel FMS, Mendelsohn MS, Logemann JA: Manofluorography of deglutition after supraglottic laryngectomy.HNS 9:142–150, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  22. McConnell FMS: Analysis of pressure generation and bolus transit during pharyngeal swallowing.Laryngoscope 98:71–78, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  23. McConnell FMS, Hester TR, Mendelsohn MS, Logemann JA: Manofluorography of deglutition after total laryngopharyngectomy.Plast Reconstr Surg 81:346–351, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  24. McConnel FMS, Cerenko D, Jackson RT: Clinical application of the manofluorogram.Laryngoscope 98:705–711, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ogura JH, Kawasaki M, Takenouchi S: Neurophysiologic observations on the adaptive mechanism of deglutition.Ann ORL 73:1062–1081, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rowe LD, Miller AJ, Chierici G, Clendenning D: Adaptation in the function of pharyngeal constrictor muscles.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 92:392–401, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  27. Humphreys B, Mathog R, Rosen R, Miller P, Muz J, Nelson R: Videofluoroscopic and scintigraphic analysis of dysphagia in the head and neck cancer patient.Laryngoscope 97:25–32, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  28. Perlman AL, Luschei ES, DuMond CE: Electrical activity from the superior pharyngeal constrictor during reflexive and nonreflexive tasks.J Speech Hear Res 32:749–754, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sonies BC: Ultrasound imaging and swallowing. In: Donner M, Jones B (eds.):Normal and Abnormal Swallowing: Imaging in Diagnosis and Therapy. New York: Springer, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bastian RW, Collins SL, Kaniff T, Matz GJ: Indirect videolaryngoscopy versus laryngoscopy for larynx and pharynx cancer staging: toward elimination of preliminary direct laryngoscopy.Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 98:693–698, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bastian RW, Nagorsky MJ: Laryngeal image biofeedback.Laryngoscope 97:1346–1349, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bastian RW: Laryngeal image biofeedback for voice disorder patients.J Voice 1:279–282, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  33. Langmore SE, Schatz K, Olsen N: Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: a new procedure.Dysphagia 2:216–219, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bastian RW: Videoendoscopic evaluation of patients with dysphagia: an adjunct to the modified barium swallow.Otol HNS 104:339–350, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bastian RW: Videoendoscopic evaluation of dysphagia in an office setting. In:Clinical Geriatric Otorhinolaryngology. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, 1992, pp 13–20

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bastian, R.W. The videoendoscopic swallowing study: An alternative and partner to the videofluoroscopic swallowing study. Dysphagia 8, 359–367 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01321780

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01321780

Key words

Navigation