Skip to main content
Log in

The incidence of wrongdoing, whistle-blowing, and retaliation: Results of a naturally occurring field experiment

  • Articles
  • Published:
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study examined two general research questions pertaining to the passage of a law designed to encourage whistle-blowing: (a) Has the incidence of perceived wrongdoing, whistle-blowing, anonymous whistle-blowing, or retaliation changed following the passage of the law? (b) What variables predict the comprehensiveness of retaliation that identified whistle-blowers claim to have experienced? One questionnaire was mailed to members of 15 organizations affected by the law in 1980 (n=8500) and a second was administered in 1983 (n=4700). There was some evidence that the law had beneficial effects; specifically, the incidence of perceived wrongdoing declined and whistle-blowing increased. Unfortunately, identified whistle-blowers were just as likely to experience retaliation in 1983 as they were in 1980. The predictors of the comprehensiveness of the retaliation experienced were generally the same in both years. The results tentatively suggest that more legal and organizational encouragement of whistle-blowing is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J., & VanAtta, D. (1987, May 17). Whistle-blowers need aid.Newark (OH) Advocate, 4 A.

  • Dworkin, T. M., & Near, J. P. (1987). Whistle-blowing statutes: Are they working?American Business Law Journal, 25(2), 241–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, D. W. (1983).Do it My Way-Or You're Fired! New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W. (1986). Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical essay. In Staw, B. M., & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 8, pp. 1–52). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories.Academy of Management Review, 12, 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberger, D. B., Miceli, M. P., & Cohen, D. (1987). Oppositionists and group norms: The reciprocal influence of whistle-blowers and co-workers.Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 527–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E. P. (1960). Competence and conformity in the acceptance of influence.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 361–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. V. (1987). Ethical tension points in whistle-blowing.Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 321–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killingsworth, M. R., & Reimers, C. W. (1983). Race, ranking, promotions, and pay at a Federal facility: A logit analysis.Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 37, 92–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (1984). The relationships among beliefs, organizational position and whistle-blowing status: A discriminant analysis.Academy of Management Journal, 27, 676–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (1985). Characteristics of organizational climate and perceived wrongdoing associated with whistle-blowing decisions.Personnel Psychology, 38, 525–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nader, R., Petkas, P. J., & Blackwell, K. (Eds.). (1972).Whistle-Blowing: The Report on the Conference on Professional Responsibility. New York: Grossman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Near, J. P., & Jensen, T. C. (1983). The whistle-blowing process: Retaliation and perceived effectiveness.Work and Occupations, 10, 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing.Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1986). Retaliation against whistle-blowers: predictors and effects.Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1987). Whistle-blowers in organizations: Dissidents or reformers? In Staw, B. M., & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 321–368). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmerlee, M. A., Near, J. P., & Jensen, T. C. (1982). Correlates of whistle-blowers' perceptions of organizational retaliation,Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, C., & Branch, T. (1972).Blowing the Whistle: Dissent in the Public Interest: New York: Washington Monthly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978).The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Merit Systems Protection Board (USMSPB). (1981).Whistle-Blowing and the Federal Employee. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Merit Systems Protection Board (USMSPB). (1984).Blowing the Whistle in the Federal Government: A Comparative Analysis of 1980 and 1983 Survey Findings. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, D. (1979).Bureaucratic Opposition. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miceli, M.P., Near, J.P. The incidence of wrongdoing, whistle-blowing, and retaliation: Results of a naturally occurring field experiment. Employ Respons Rights J 2, 91–108 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384940

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384940

Key Words

Navigation