Skip to main content
Log in

Testing balancedness and perfection of linear matrices

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

A (0, 1) matrix is linear if it does not contain a 2×2 submatrix of all ones. In this paper we give polynomial algorithms to test whether a linear matrix is balanced or perfect. The algorithms are based on decomposition results previously obtained by the authors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • C. Berge, “Farbung von graphen, deren samtliche bzw. deren ungerade kreise star sind (Zusammenfassung),” Will. Z. Martin Luther University, Halle Wittenberg Math. Natur. Reihe (1961) 114.

  • C. Berge, “Balanced matrices”,Mathematical Programming 2 (1972) 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Chvátal, “On certain polytopes associated with graphs,”Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 18 (1975) 138–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Conforti, “Diamond free perfect graphs and star cutsets,” in: B. Simeone, ed.,Lecture Notes in Mathematics (Springer, Berlin, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Conforti and M.R. Rao, “Articulation sets in linear perfect matrices and hypergraphs II: The wheel theorem and clique articulations,” (1986), to appear in:Discrete Mathematics.

  • M. Conforti and M.R. Rao, “Structural properties and recognition of restricted and strongly unimodular matrices,”Mathematical Programming 38 (1987) 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Conforti and M.R. Rao, “Odd cycles and matrices with integrality properties,”Mathematical Programming (Series B) 45 (1989) 279–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Conforti and M.R. Rao, “Properties of balanced and perfect matrices,”Mathematical Programming 55 (1992a) 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Conforti and M.R. Rao, “Structural properties and decomposition of linear balanced matrices,”Mathematical Programming 55 (1992b) 129–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Conforti and M.R. Rao, “Articulation sets in linear perfect matrices and hypergraphs I: Forbidden configurations and star cutsets,”Discrete Mathematics 104 (1992c) 23–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Fonlupt and A. Zemirline, “A polynomial recognition algorithm forK 4e free perfect graphs,” Research Report, University of Grenoble (Grenoble, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Golumbic,Algorithmic Graph Theory and Perfect Graphs (Wiley, New York, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • G.L. Nemhauser and L. Wolsey,Integer and Combinatorial Programming (Wiley, New York, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Padberg, “Perfect zero–one matrices,”Mathematical Programming 6 (1974) 180–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • K.R. Parthasarathy and G. Ravindra, “The validity of the strong perfect-graph conjecture for (K 4e) free graphs,”Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 26 (1979) 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Tucker, “Coloring perfect (K 4e) free graphs,” Technical Report, SUNY (Stony Brook, 1985).

  • S. Whitesides, “An algorithm for finding clique cut-sets,”Information Processing Letters 12 (1981) 31–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Yannakakis, “On a class of totally unimodular matrices,”Mathematics of Operations Research 10 (1985) 280–304.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Partial support under NSF Grants DMS 8606188, DDM8800281 and DDM9001705.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conforti, M., Rao, M.R. Testing balancedness and perfection of linear matrices. Mathematical Programming 61, 1–18 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01582135

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01582135

Key words

Navigation