Skip to main content
Log in

Can explaining be learnt? Some lecturers' views

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A random sample of 93 lecturers responded to a 40-item questionnaire based on researches into explaining. The lecturers' views on the learnability of various features of explaining were not related to their years of experience of lecturing. But there were significant differences between arts-based and science lecturers on seventeen of the variables and between least and most experienced lecturers on ten of the variables concerned with assigned values. It is suggested that a lecturer's views on explaining may arise from the experience of studying a subject as an undergraduate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bligh, D. (1972),What's the Use of Lectures? Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bligh, D., Ephraim, N., Jacques, D. and Piper, D. W. (1975).Teaching Students. University of Exeter.

  • Brown, G. A. (1977). “Myths of university teaching,”Impetus 6: 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. A. (1980). “Explaining: Studies from the Higher Education Context.” Final Report to SSRC, University of Nottingham.

  • Brown, G. A. and Bakhtar, M. (1981). “Lecturers on Lecturing.” Mimeo, University of Nottingham.

  • Costin, F. (1972). “Lecturing versus other methods of teaching: A review of research,”British Journal of Educational Technology 3: 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunkin, M. J. and Biddle, B. J. (1974).The Study of Teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage, N. L. (1972). Chapter 9 in Westbury, I. and Bellack, A. (eds.)Research into Classroom Processes. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeachie, W. J. (1963). “Research on teaching at the college and university level,” pp. 1118–1172 in Gage, N. L. (ed.)Handbook of Research on Teaching. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeish, J. (1968).The Lecture Method. Cambridge: Cambridge Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeish, J. (1976). “The lecture method,” in Gage, N. L. (ed.)The Psychology of Teaching Methods. The Seventy-fifth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: National Society of the Study of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miltz, R. (1971). “Development and evaluation of a manual for improving teachers' explanations,” Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford (available from the National Lending Library).

  • Rosenshine, B. (1971). “Teaching Behaviours and Student Achievement,” I.E.A. Studies No. 1, National Foundation of Education Research.

  • Shutes, R. (1969). “Verbal Behaviours and Instructional Effectiveness,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.

  • Thyne, J. M. (1963).The Psychology of Learning and Techniques of Teaching. London: University of London Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verner, C. and Dickinson, G. (1968). “The lecture, an analysis and review of research,”Adult Education 17: 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, G.A., Daines, J.M. Can explaining be learnt? Some lecturers' views. High Educ 10, 573–580 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01676902

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01676902

Keywords

Navigation