Summary
The difficulties in diagnosing acute idiopathic myocarditis have been highlighted. Only about 30% of clinically suspected cases show morphologic evidence of an inflammatory infiltrate. Difficulties experienced in obtaining positive results include timing of the biosy in relation to the acute symptoms of the patient, sampling error, and quantitative criteria. In addition, pressure from the referring physician may influence the pathologic interpretation, i.e., in making a morphologic diagnosis on slender evidence. Caution is also necessary in the interpretation of end-stage disease of dilated cardiomyopathy and “chronic myocarditis.” This is important as it influences therapy with immunosuppressive agents. The importance of obtaining a detailed history of drugs to which the patient might have been exposed and can result in myocarditis is also stressed. Only if an accurate and unbiased pathologic evaluation can be made will a prospective, randomized multicenter trial yield useful information. The Dallas Myocarditis Panel has set forth useful criteria and guidelines in an attempt to classify the morphologic diagnosis of myocarditis. Semantic and diagnostic criteria for myocarditis can still be challenged, but the Dallas criteria for evaluation does allow an accurate assessment by all pathologists, in spite of individual variation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Saphir O (1947) Myocarditis—A general overview, with an analysis of two hundred and forty cases. Arch Pathol 32: 1000–1051
Stevens PJ, Underwood, Ground KE (1970) Occurrence and significance of myocarditis in trauma. Aerospace Med. 41: 770–780
Noren GR, Staley NA, Bandt CM, Kaplan EL (1977) Occurrence of myocarditis in sudden death in children. J Forensic Sci 22: 118–196
Mills AS, Hastillo A, Hess ML (1984) Lymphocytic infiltration of the myocardium in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: Underestimation of myocarditis with endomyocardial biopsy. Circulation 70 (Suppl II): 1604 (Abstract)
Baandrup U, Olsen EGJ (1981) Critical analysis of endomyocardial biopsies from patients suspected of having cardiomyopathy, I. morphological and morphometric aspects. Br Heart J 45: 475–486
Chi-Sung, Zee-Cheng, Chen Chang Tsai, Palmer D, Codd J, Pennington G, Williams GA (1984) High incidence of myocarditis by endomyocardial biopsy in patients with idiopathic congestive cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 3: 63–70
Frenkel HS (1970) Cardiomyopathy due to Coxackie B. J Iowa Med Soc 62: 527–530
Burch GE, Colcolough HL (1969) Progressive Coxsackie viral pancarditis and nephritis. Ann Intern Med 71: 963–990
Somerville W (1972) Postcarditic myocardiopathy. Postgrad Med J 48: 746–749 (1972)
Billingham ME, Mason JW (1984) Endomyocardial biopsy diagnosis of myocarditis and changes following immunosuppressive treatment. In: Bolte H-D (ed) Viral heart disease. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 200–210
Caves PK, Schultz WP, Dong E Jr, Stinson EB, Shumway NE (1974) New instrument for transvenous cardiac biopsy. Am J Cardiol 33: 264
Caves PK, Stinson EB, Billingham ME, Shumway NE (1973) Percutaneous transvenous endomyocardial biopsy in human heart recipients. Ann Thorac Surg 16: 325
Tazelaar HD, Billingham ME (1985) Leucocytic infiltrates in idiopathic dialted cardiomyopathy: A source of confusion with active myocarditis. Lab Invest (Abstract) 52: 67A
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported in part by the Clinical Heart and Lung Transplantation Grant H-L 13108-15 from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Billingham, M.E. The diagnostic criteria of myocarditis by endomyocardial biopsy. Heart Vessels 1 (Suppl 1), 133–137 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02072380
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02072380