Skip to main content
Log in

On a controversial method for modeling a coregionalization

  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews two alternative approaches for modeling the (cross) variograms in a coregionalization: (1) fitting the traditional linear model of coregionalization. or (2) deducing the crossvariogram model as a linear combination of prior direct (auto) variogram models while checking the Cauchy-Schwarz inequalities. We show that the second approach has no practical advantage over the traditional one and may not be valid if more than two variables are involved. In such case. Cauchy-Schwarz inequalities are necessary but not sufficient conditions for validity of a coregionalization model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carr, J. R., and Mao, N., 1993a, Comparison of Disjunctive Kriging to Generalized Probability Kriging in Application to the Estimation of Simulated and Real Data,in A. Soares (Ed.).Geostatistics Tróia 92: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht, p. 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, J. R., and Mao, N., 1993b, A General Form of Probability Kriging for Estimation of the Indicator and Uniform Transforms: Math. Geol.. v. 25, p. 425–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, J. R., and McCallister, P. G., 1985, An Application of Cokriging for Estimation of Tripartite Earthquake Response Spectra: Math. Geol., v. 17, p. 527–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulard, M., 1989, Inference in a Coregionalization Model,in M. Armstrong (Ed.).Geostatistics. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht, p. 397–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulard, M., and Voltz, M., 1992, Linear Coregionalization Model. Tools for Estimation and Choice of Cross variogram Matrix. Math. Geol., v. 24. p. 269–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel, A. G., and Huijbregts, C. J., 1978,Mining Geostatistics: Academic Press, London. 600 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, Ch. and Pawlowsky V., 1985. Modelisation de Variogrammes Croises-Comment Satisfaire a Mnegahte de Cauchy-Schwarz: Sciences de la Terre., v. 24. p. 53–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. E., 1982, Matrix Formulation of Co-kriging: Math. Geol., v. 14. p. 249–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. E., and Carr. J. R., 1984, Co-kriging and Principal Component Analysis: Bentonite data revisited Sciences de la Terre. v. 21. p. 65–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, G. 1993, Regionalized Favorability Theory for Information Synthesis in Mineral Exploration: Math. Geol., v. 25. p. 603–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, G., Moss, K., Herner, T. and Carr, J. R., 1992, A Fortran Program for Three-Dimensional Cokriging with Case Demonstration: Comp Geosct., v. 18. p. 557–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, G. Gaard, D., Moss, K., and Herner, T., 1993, A Comparison Between Cokriging and Ordinary Kriging. Case Study with a Polymetallic Deposit. Math Geol., v. 25. p. 377–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowsky, V. and Stattegger, K., 1988, Cokriging of Compositional Data-A Case Study from Modern Stream Sands Sciences de la Terre. v. 28. p. 267–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, R., Warrick, A. W., and Myers, D. E., 1992, Improvement of the Prediction of Soil Particle Size Fractions Using Spectral Properties Geoderma. v. 52. p. 223–234.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goovaerts, P. On a controversial method for modeling a coregionalization. Math Geol 26, 197–204 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02082763

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02082763

Key words

Navigation