Skip to main content
Log in

Generalized cross-validation for covariance model selection

  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A weighted cross-validation technique known in the spline literature as generalized cross-validation (GCV), is proposed for covariance model selection and parameter estimation. Weights for prediction errors are selected to give more importance to a cluster of points than isolated points. Clustered points are estimated better by their neighbors and are more sensitive to model parameters. This rational weighting scheme also provides a simplifying significantly the computation of the cross-validation mean square error of prediction. With small- to medium-size datasets, GCV is performed in a global neighborhood. Optimization of usual isotropic models requires only a small number of matrix inversions. A small dataset and a simulation are used to compare performances of GCV to ordinary cross-validation (OCV) and least-squares filling (LS).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bates, D., Lindstrom, M., Wahba, G., and Yandell, B., 1987, GCVPACK-routines for generalized cross validation: Comm. Statist. B-Simulation Comput., v. 16. no. 1, p. 263–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. D., and Weisberg, S., 1982. Residuals and influence in regression: Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability: Chapman and Hall. New York. 230 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craven, P., and Wahba, G., 1979, Smoothing noisy data with spline functions: Estimating the correct degree of smoothing by the method of generalized cross validation: Numer. Math., v. 31. no. 4, p. 377–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N., 1991, Statistics for spatial data: Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics: Wiley Interscience, New York, 900 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, C. V., and Journel, A. G., 1992. GSLIB—Geostatistical Software Library and users guide: Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 340 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubrule, O., 1983. Cross validation of kriging in a unique neighborhood: Math. Geology, v. 15, no. 6, p. 687–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englund, E., and Sparks, A., 1988, GEO-EAS (Geostatistical Environmental Assessment Software)-user's guide: Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas Nevada. EPA600/4-88/033. 196 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golub, G. H., Heath, M., and Wahba, G., 1979, Generalized cross validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter: Technometrics, v. 21, no. 2, p. 215–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheron, G., 1970, La théorie des variables régionalisées et ses applications: Les cahiers du centre de morphologie mathématique. Fascicule 5. 212 p.

  • Montès, P., 1994, Smoothing noisy data by kriging with nugget effects,in Laurent, P. J., and others, eds., Wavelets, images and surface fitting: A. K. Peters, Wellesley, Massachusetts, p. 371–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samper Calvete, F. J., and Neuman, S. P., 1989, Geostatistical analysis of groundwater quality data from the Madrid basin using adjoint state maximum likelihood cross validation,in Armstrong, M., ed., Geostatistics: Quantitative geology and geostatistics: Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, p. 725–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandjivy, L., 1984, The factorial kriging analysis of regionalized data. Its application to geochemical prospecting,in Verly, G., and others, eds., Geostatistics for natural resources characterization: NATO-ASI Series C (vol. 122), Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, p. 559–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, B. W., 1985, Some aspects of the spline smoothing approach to non-parametric regression curve fitting, Jour. Roy. Statis. Soc. B, v. 47, no. 1, p. 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahba, G., 1983, Bayesian “confidence intervals” for the cross validated smoothing spline: Jour. Roy. Statist. Soc. B, v. 45, no. 1, p. 133–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahba, G., 1990, Spline models for observational data: Univ. Wisconsin at Madison, Monograph 59, 169 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, R., and Oliver, M., 1991, How large a sample is needed to estimate the regional variogram adequately,in Soares, A., ed., Geostatistics Troia'92: Quantitative geology and geostatistics: Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p. 155–166.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marcotte, D. Generalized cross-validation for covariance model selection. Math Geol 27, 659–672 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02093906

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02093906

Key words

Navigation