Skip to main content
Log in

Repeat victimization among adolescents and young adults

  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prior research has shown that victimization incidents are disproportionately concentrated among relatively few victims and that prior victimization is a consistent predictor of future risk. This paper expands existing knowledge on victimization by describing temporal patterns of risk and by developing and testing alternative explanatory models of the link between past and future risk. Analyses based on panel data from the National Youth Survey support both state dependence and heterogeneity interpretations of the correlation in risk over time. In other words, prior victimization predicts future risk in part because it alters something about the individual, and because it indicates an unmeasured propensity for victimization that persists over time. The theoretical implications of these findings, including the feasibility of a victim labeling perspective, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barr, R., and Pease, K. (1990). Crime placement, displacement and deflection. In Tonry, M., and Morris, N. (eds.),Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 12, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 277–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. (1983). Crime as social control.Am. Sociol Rev. 48: 34–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bursik, R. (1980). The dynamics of specialization in juvenile offenses.Soc. Forces 58: 851–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., and Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach.Am. Sociol. Rev. 44: 588–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Kluegel, J., and Land, K. (1981). Social inequality and predatory criminal victimization: An exposition and test of a formal theory.Am. Sociol. Rev. 46: 505–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1992).Patterns of Specialization and Escalation in Crime: A Longitudinal Analysis of Juvenile and Adult Arrest Transitions in the Glueck Data, Ph.D. dissertation. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D., Knowles, B., and Canter, R. (1981). The epidemiology of delinquent behavior and drug use among American adolescents. Project Report No. 14, The National Youth Survey, Behavioral Research Institute, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D., Huizinga, D., and Ageton, S. (1985).Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, G. (1992). Multiple victimization: Its extent and significance.Int. Rev. Criminol. 2: 85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. (1993). Understanding and preventing bullying. In Tonry, M. (ed.).Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 17, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 381–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fattah, E. (1967). Towards a criminological classification of victims.Int. Crim. Police Rev. 22: 163–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fattah, E. (1991).Understanding Criminal Victimization: An Introduction to Theoretical Victimology Prentice-Hall, Scarborough, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, S. (1980). Statistical modelling in the analysis of repeat victimization. In Feinberg, S., and Reiss, A. (eds.),Indicators of Crime and Criminal Justice: Quantitative Studies, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, pp. 54–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garofalo, J., Siegel, L., and Laub, J. (1987). School-related victimizations among adolescents: An analysis of the National Crime Survey narratives.J. Quant. Criminol. 3: 321–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. (1984).Victims of Crime: The Dimensions of Risk, Home Office Research Study 81, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M., and Hirschi, T. (1990).A General Theory of Crime, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. (1992).LIMDEP User's Manual and Reference Guide (Version 6.0), Econometric Software, Bellport, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. (1993).Econometric Analysis, 2nd ed., Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M., Gottfredson, M., and Garafalo, J. (1978).Victims of Personal Crime: An Empirical Foundation for a Theory of Personal Victimization, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, G., and Brownfield, D. (1986). Gender, lifestyles, and victimization: Beyond routine activity theory.Violence Victims 1: 85–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D., and Burke, P. (1980).Log-Linear Models, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauritsen, J., Sampson, R., and Laub, J. (1991). The link between offending and victimization among adolescents.Criminology 29(2): 265–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauritsen, J., Laub, J., and Sampson, R. (1992). Conventional and delinquent activities: Implications for the prevention of violent victimizations among adolescents.Violence Victims 7: 91–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, R., and Miethe, T. (1993). Understanding theories of criminal victimization. In Tonry, M. (ed.),Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 17, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 459–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagin, D., and Paternoster, R. (1991). On the relationship of past to future participation in delinquency.Criminology 29: 163–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. (1980). Multiple victimization in American cities: A statistical analysis of rare events.Am. J. Sociol. 85: 870–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, A. (1980). Victim proneness in repeat victimization by type of crime. In Fienberg, S., and Reiss, A. (eds.).Indicators of Crime and Criminal Justice: Quantitative Studies, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, pp. 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R., and Laub, J. (1993).Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points Through Life, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D., Dodge, K., and Coie, J. (1993). The emergence of chronic peer victimization in boys' play groups.Child Dev. 64: 1755–1772.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, S. (1981). Homogenous victim-offender populations: A review and some research implications.J. Crim. Law Criminol. 72: 779–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., Genn, H., and Dodd, D. (1977).Surveying Victims: A Study of the Measurement of Criminal Victimization, Perceptions of Crime, and Attitudes to Criminal Justice, Wiley, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R. (1981). Multiple victimization: Evidence, theory, and future research.J. Crim. Law Criminol. 72: 762–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R. (1982).Research on Victims of Crime: Accomplishments, Issues, and New Directions, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trickett, A., Osborn, D., Seymour, J., and Pease, K. (1991). What is different about high crime areas?Br. J. Criminol. 32: 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hentig, H. (1948).The Criminal and His Victim, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Phoenix, 1993.

An exception to this lack of attention is the vast literature in the area of domestic abuse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lauritsen, J.L., Davis Quinet, K.F. Repeat victimization among adolescents and young adults. J Quant Criminol 11, 143–166 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221121

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221121

Key words

Navigation