Abstract
Skin conductance variables have been compared in 30 anxious patients and 30 controls to investigate the extent to which anxiety is associated with increased autonomic arousal, reduced habituation or enhanced aversive conditioning. Skin conductance level, variability (spontaneous fluctuations) and response amplitudes to tones were significantly greater in patients than controls. Habituation of skin conductance responses to a series of ten innocuous tones (80 dB, 1 s) did not differ between the groups. Aversively conditioned skin conductance responses were measured to a further series of ten tones after a conditioning trial in which a loud white noise (100 dB) followed tone 11. All subjects showed enhanced (conditioned) responses to the tones after the conditioning trial, but patients did not show greater conditioning than controls. The results indicate that anxious neurotic out-patients have greater sweat gland activity and reactivity than controls but fail to demonstrate differences in central mechanisms of habituation or conditioning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asso D, Beech HE (1975) Susceptibility to the acquisition of a conditioned response in relation to the menstrual cycle. J Psychosomatic Res 19:337–344
Bitterman ME, Holtzman WH (1952) Conditioning and extinction of the galvanic skin response as a function of anxiety. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 47:615–623
Clum GA (1969) A correlational analysis of relationships between personality and perceptual variables and discriminant GSR conditioning. J Clin Psychol 25:33–35
Eysenck HJ (1979) The conditioning model of neurosis. Behav Brain Sci 2:155–199
Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SPG (1964) Eysenck personality inventory. University of London Press, London
Eisdorfer C, Doerr HO, Follete W (1980) Electrodermal reactivity: an analysis by age and sex. J Hum Stress 6:39–42
Gray JA (1987) The psychology of fear and stress, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Guimaraes FS, Hellewell J, Wang M, Deakin JFW (1990) Sex differences in aversive classical conditioning and responsiveness to anxiolytic drugs in humans. Br J Clin Pharmacol 29:141–142p
Guimaraes FS, Hellewell J, Hensman R, Wang M, Deakin JFW (1991) Characterization of a psychophysiological model of classical fear conditioning in healthy volunteers: influence of gender, instruction, personality and placebo. Psychopharmacology 104:231–236
Hellewell J, Hensman R, Guimaraes F, Wang M, Deakin JFW (1989) Effects of 5HT-active drugs on aversive conditioning in healthy volunteers. J Psychopharmacol 3:111p
Hensman R (1987) The effects of 5HT2 antagonist ritanserin on psychophysiological measures of conditioning. University of Manchester (unpublished MSc thesis)
Howe ES (1958) GSR conditioning in anxiety states, normals, and chronic functional schizophrenic subjects. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 56:183–189
Lader M (1975) The psychophysiology of mental illness. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
Pitman RK, Orr SP (1986) Test of the conditioning model of neurosis: differential aversive conditioning of angry and neutral facial expressions in anxiety disorder patients. J Abnorm Psychol 95:208–213
Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE (1970) Manual for the State-trait anxiety inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press, California
Streiner DL, Dean SJ (1968) Expectancy, anxiety and the GSR. Psychon Sci 10:293–294
Venables PH, Christie MJ (1980) Electrodermal activity. In: Martin I, Venables PH (eds) Techniques in psychophysiology. John Wiley, Chichester, pp 3–67
Vila J, Beech HR (1977) Vulnerability and conditioning in relation to the human menstrual cycle. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 16:69–75
Wang M, Hensman R, Deakin JFW (1988) A human analogue of anxiety employing psychophysiological measures. Psychopharmacology 96 [suppl]:109
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ashcroft, K.R., Guimarães, F.S., Wang, M. et al. Evaluation of a psychophysiological model of classical fear conditioning in anxious patients. Psychopharmacology 104, 215–219 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244181
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244181