Skip to main content
Log in

Conclusions

As can be seen from Table 1, the two trend surfaces give considerably different values. Our data were chosen not to fit any one plane and this is reflected in both of the trend surfaces. The program has been run with different data, and as the data tend toward a plane both trend surfaces become nearly identical as one would expect.

We conclude that the type of plane to use for trend-surface analysis does indeed depend on the hypotheses of the fitting technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • Harbaugh, J. W., and Merriam, D. F., 1968, Computer applications in stratigraphic analysis: John Wiley & Sons, New York, 282 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sturgul, J.R., Aiken, C. The best plane through data. Mathematical Geology 2, 325–331 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02312481

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02312481

Keywords

Navigation