This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
CONNELLY, F.M., CROCKER, R.K. & KASS, H. (1985). “Science Education in Canada”, in: Vol. 1Policies, practices and perceptions. Toronto, OISE press.
CUBAN, L. (1984).How teachers taught: constancy and change in American classroom 1890–1980. New York, Longman.
DOYLE, W. (1977). “Paradigms for research on teacher effectiveness”,Review of Research in Education. 5:163–198.
DOYLE, W. & PONDER, G.A. (1977). “The practicality ethic in teacher decision making”,Interchange 8, 3:1–12.
FISHER, C.W. & BERLINER, D.C. (1985).Perspectives on instructional time, New York and London, Longman.
GAGNE, R.M. (1970).The conditions of learning, New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc (Second Edition).
GOODLAD, J.I. (1984).A place called school, New York, McGraw Hill.
HARNISCHFEGER, A. & WILEY, D.E. (1976). “The teaching — learning process in elementary schools”,Curriculum Inquiry, 6 (1):5–43.
HEAD, J.O. (1974). “Methods and techniques of teaching”. In: Sutton, C.R., & HAYSOM, J.T. (eds.).The art of the science teacher, London, New York, McGraw-Hill.
SCHWAB, J.J. (1960). “The teaching of science as enquiry”. In: J.J. SCHWAB & P.R. BRANDWEIN:The teaching of science Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press.
— (1970).The Practical: A language for curriculum Washington D.C. National Education Association.
SUTTON, C.R. & HAYSOM, J.T. (eds.) (1974).The art of the science teacher, London, New York, McGraw-Hill.
Additional information
The study upon which this paper is based was funded by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ben-Peretz, M., Menis, J. Conditions of learning in science classrooms and what we can learn from them. Research in Science Education 16, 101–110 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356823
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356823