Skip to main content
Log in

Neo-lockeanism and circularity

  • Discussion
  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Butler, Joseph. 1736. ‘Of Personal Identity’ (1st appendix to Butler'sThe Analogy of Religion); reprinted inPersonal Identity ed. J. Perry, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975, 99–105.

  • Lewis, David. 1976. ‘Survival and Identity’, inThe Identity of Persons ed. A. Rorty, Berkeley: University of California Press, 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Raymond. 1987. ‘Memory, Connecting and What Matters in Survival’,Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65, 82–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, Derek. 1971. ‘Personal Identity’,Philosophical Review 80; reprinted inThe Philosophy of Mind, ed. J. Glover, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986, 142–62.

  • Parfit, Derek. 1986.Reasons and Persons, Oxford: Clarendon (rev. ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, Sydney. 1970. ‘Persons and their Pasts,’American Philosophical Quarterly 7, 269–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, Sydney. 1984. ‘Personal Identity: A Materialist's Account,’ inPersonal Identity, by Shoemaker and Richard Swinburne., Oxford: Blackwell, 69–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollheim, Richard. 1984. TheThread of Life, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Campbell, S. Neo-lockeanism and circularity. Philosophia 28, 477–489 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02379796

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02379796

Navigation