Abstract
This paper reports on a longitudinal interpretive case study of the transtion from preservice to inservice science teaching. We describe four sets of overlapping worlds that provide vantagepoints for the study. Three sets describe the experiences of Katie, the participating teacher. These are the world of the person who is good at science and the world of the person who is not, the world of the student teacher and the world of the novice teacher, and the world of the primary science classroom and the world of the primary classroom during other subjects. The final set describes our development as researchers during this period—the world of the specialist science teacher and the world of the generalist teacher. In our analysis of the transition experience, we employ the term entryways to describe understandings and strategies that helped the teacher and ourselves to move between contrasting perspectives.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abell, S. K., & Smith, D. C. (1994). What is science? Preservice primary teachers' conceptions of the nature of science.International Journal of Science Education, 16, 475–487.
Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossings into the subculture of science.Studies in Science Education, 27, 1–52.
Appleton, K. (1984). Student teachers' opinions: A follow up.Research in Science Education, 14, 157–166.
Appleton, K. (1993). Teacher education. In D. Goodrum (Ed.),Science in the early years of schooling: An Australian perspective (pp. 32–40). Perth, WA: Key Centre for School Science and Mathematics, Curtin University of Technology.
Atwood, R. K., & Atwood, V. A. (1996). Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the causes of seasons.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 553–563.
Australian Academy of Science. (1994).Primary investigations. Canberra: Author.
Australian Science Technology and Engineering Council (ASTEC). (1997).Foundations for Australia's future: Science and technology in primary schools. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Office
Bearlin, M. (1990). Towards a gender sensitive model of science teacher education for women primary and early childhood teachers.Research in Science Education, 20, 21–30.
Bratt, H. M. (1977). An investigation of two methods of science instruction and teacher attitudes towards science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14, 533–538.
Bullough, R. V. (1989).First-year teacher: A case study. New York: Teachers College Press.
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1986). On narrative method, personal philosophy, and narrative unities in the story of teaching.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(4), 293–310.
Eiriksson, S. (1997). Preservice teachers' perceived constraints of teaching science in the elementary classroom.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 9(2), 18–27.
Eisner, E. W. (1991).The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York: Macmillan.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119–161). New York: Macmillan.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln, (Eds.),Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Fensham, P., Navaratnum, K., Jones, W., & West, L. (1991). Students' estimates of knowledge gained as measures of the quality of teacher education.Research in Science Education, 21, 80–89.
Ginns, I. S., & Watters, J. J. (1995). An analysis of scientific understandings of preservice primary teacher education students.Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32, 205–222.
Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992).Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. New York: Longman.
Goodrum, D., Cousins, J., & Kinnear, A. (1992). The reluctant primary school teacher.Research in Science Education, 22, 163–169.
Groves, F. H., & Pugh, A. F. (1999). Elementary pre-service teacher perceptions of the greenhouse effect.Journal of Science Education & Technology, 8(1), 75–81.
Gustafson, B. J., & Rowell, P. M. (1995) Primary preservice teachers constructing conceptions about learning science, teaching science and the nature of science,International Journal of Science Education, 17, 589–605.
Henderson, G. (1992). Improving the quality of primary science teaching through a preservice course.Research in Science Education, 22, 188–193.
Holroyd, C., & Harlen, W. (1996). Primary teachers' confidence about teaching science and technology.Research Papers in Education: Policity & Practice, 11, 323–335.
Howes, E. V. (1999, April)Strengths preservice teachers bring to science teaching: An anti-deficit approach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
Jeans, B., & Farnsworth, I. (1992). Primary science education: Views from three Australian states.Research in Science Education, 22, 214–223.
Jones, B. (1991).Preservice primary teachers' explanations of diurnal, seasonal and lunar phenomena. School of Education, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia. (Unpublished paper).
Kruger, C., & Summers, M. (1989). An investigation of some primary teachers' understanding of changes in materials.School Science Review, 71, 17–27.
Lortie, D. C. (1975).Schoolteacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Louden, W., & Wallace, J. (1992). Knowing and teaching science: The constructivist paradox.International Journal of Science Education, 16, 649–657.
Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (1999, April).Learning and teaching elementary science in the transition from preservice to inservice teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
Palmer, W. P. (1995, July).Science through their eyes: Reflections of student teachers of their own science learning. Paper presented at the Australasian Teacher Educators Association Conference, Sydney.
Roth, K. J., Hasbach, C., Hazelwood, C., Hoekwater, E., Ligett, C., Lindquest, B., Peasley, K., & Rosean, C. L. (1993).Entryways into science and science teaching: Teacher and researcher development in a professional development school. Centre for the Learning and Teaching of Primary Subjets: Michigan State University, MI.
Schoeneberger, M., & Russell, T. (1896). Primary science as a little added frill: A report of two case studies.Science Education, 70, 519–538.
Scott, A. W. (1989). Inservice for primary teachers in science education: Some directions for the future.Research in Science Education, 19, 249–256.
Skamp, K. (1989). General science knowledge and attitudes towards science and science teaching of preservice primary teachers: Implications for preservice science units.Research in Science Education, 19, 257–267.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990).Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage Publications.
Summers, M., & Kruger, C. (1993, September).Long term impact of a new approach to teacher education for primary science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the British Educational Research Association, Liverpool, England.
Wallace, J., & Louden, W. (1992). Science teaching and teachers' knowledge: Prospects for reform of elementary classrooms.Science Education, 76, 507–521.
Webb, P. (1992). Primary science teachers' understandings of electric current.International Journal of Science Education, 14, 423–429.
Yates, S., & Goodrum, D. (1990). How confident are primary school teachers in teaching science?Research in Science Education, 20, 300–305.
Young, B. J., & Kellogg, T. (1993). Science attitudes and preparation of preservice primary teachers.Science Education, 77, 279–291.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mulholland, J., Wallace, J. Beginning primary science teaching: Entryways to different worlds. Research in Science Education 30, 155–171 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461626
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461626