Abstract
Although peer-based work is encouraged by theories in developmental psychology and although classroom interventions suggest it is effective, there are grounds for recognising that young pupils find collaborative learning hard to sustain. Discontinuities in collaborative skill during development have been suggested as one interpretation. Theory and research have neglected situational continuities that the teacher may provide in management of formal and informal collaborations. This experimental study, with the collaboration of the science faculty in one urban secondary college, investigated the effect of two role attribution strategies on communication in peer groups of different gender composition in three parallel Year 8 science classes. The group were set a problem that required them to design an experiment to compare the thermal insulating properties of two different materials. This presents the data collected and key findings, and reviews the findings from previous parallel studies that have employed the same research design in different school settings. The results confirm the effectiveness of social role attribution strategies in teacher management of communication in peer-based work.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aitkin, M., Anderson, D., Francis, B., & Hinde J. (1989).Statistical modelling in GLIM. New York: Oxford University Press.
Alton-Lee, A., Nuthall, G., & Patrick, J. (1993). Reframing classroom research: A lesson from the private world of children,Harvard Educational Review, 63(1), 50–84.
Anderson, J., Reder, L. H., & Simon, H. A. (1997). Situative versus cognitive perspectives: Form versus substance,Educational Researcher, 26(1), 18–21.
Australian Science Education Project. (1974).A guide to ASEP. Melbourne, Australia: Government Printer.
Beaton, A., Mullis, I., Gonzalez, E., Smith, T., & Kelly, D. (1997).Third international mathematics and science study: Science achievement in the middle school years. Chesnut Hill, MA: IEA-TIMMS International Study Centre, Boston College.
Bennett, N. (1991). Cooperative learning in classrooms: Processes and outcomes,Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32(4), 581–594.
Bennett, N., Desforges, C., Cockburn, A., & Wilkinson, B. (1984).The quality of pupil learing experiences. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bianchini, J. A. (1997). Where knowledge construction, equity, and context intersect: Student learning of science in small groups,Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(10), 1039–1065.
Busato, V. V., Ten Dam, G. T. M., Van Den Eeden, P., & Terwell, J. (1995). Gender-related effects of co-operative learning in a mathematics curriculum for 12–16-year-olds.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(6), 667–686.
Cohen, E. G. (1984). Talking and working together: Status, interaction and learning. In P. L. Peterson, L. C. Wilkinson, & M. Hallinan (Eds.),The social context of instruction: Group organization and group processes (pp. 171–187). New York: Academic Press.
Cohen, E. G. (1986).Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups.Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1–35.
Cooper, C. R., Marquis, A., & Ayers-Lopez, S. (1982). Peer learning in the classroom: Tracing developmental patterns and consequences of children's spontaneous interactions. In L. C. Wilkinson (Ed.),Communicating in the classroom (pp. 69–84). New York: Academic Press.
Crook, C. (1995). On resourcing a concern for collaboration within peer interactions,Cognition and Instruction, 13(4), 541–547.
Demaris, A. (1992).Logit modelling: Practical applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage University Papers, Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences.
Department of Education and Science. (1983).APU Science in schools (Age 13: Report No. 2). London: HMSO.
Di Pilla, J. (1992). Single sex science classes,Lab Talk, 36(5), 19–20.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom),Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.
Fawns, R., & Sadler, J. (1996). Managing students' learning in classrooms: Reframing classroom research,Research in science Education, 26(2), 205–217.
Galton, M., Simon, B., & Croll, P. (1980).Inside the primary school. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Gomes, S. T-M. (1994).A comparison of two strategies to manage communication in cooperative learning groups. Unpublished Master of Education Thesis, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Greeno, J. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions,Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5–17.
Herron, M. D. (1970).The nature of scientific enquiry as seen by selected philosophers, science teachers and recent curricular materials. Unpublished Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States of America.
Holden, C. (1993). Giving girls a chance: Patterns of talk in co-operative groupwork,Gender and Education, 5(2), 179–189.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1991).Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning, (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Kempa, R. F., & Ayob, A. (1991). Learning interactions in group work in science,International Journal of Science Education, 13(3), 341–354.
Lee, M. (1993). Gender, group composition, and peer interaction in computer-based cooperative learning,Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9(4), 549–577.
Matthews, E. (1996).Two teaching strategies for managing learning in small groups. Unpublished Master of Education Thesis. The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (1985).Learning in science: The implications of children's science. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
Osman, A. E. (1992).Girls can do science!!! A personal history of professional development. Unpublished Master of Education Thesis, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Palincsar, A., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching and compensation-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities, cognition and instruction,Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.
Petersen, R. P., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1991). Effects of cooperative learning on perceived status of male and female pupils.The Journal of Social Psychology, 131(5), 717–735.
Piaget, J. (1928).Judgement and reasoning in the child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Prawat, R. S. (1996). Learning community, commitment and school reform,Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18(1), 91–110.
Prawat, R. S. (1998). Current self-regulation views of learning and motivation viewed through a Deweyan lens: The problems with dualism.American Educational Research Journal, 35(2), 199–224.
Ritchie, S. M. (1998). The teacher's role in the transformation of students' understanding.Research in Science Education, 28(2), 169–185.
Ross, J. A., & Raphael, D. (1990). Communication and problem solving achievement in cooperative learning groups.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(2), 149–164.
Sadler, J. (1993).Teacher's management of learning in small groups in science classes. Unpublished Master of Education Thesis, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Sadler, J., & Fawns, R. (1993). Facilitating practitioner research into strategies for improving communication in classroom groups: Action research and interaction analysis—a reconciliation?,Research in Science Education, 23, 243–251.
Smeh, K. (1996).Classroom management of cooperative learning: A research study of two teaching strategies. Unpublished master of Education Thesis, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Terwell, J., Herfs, P. G. P., Mertens, E. H. M., & Perrenet, J. C. (1994). Co-operative learning and adaptive instruction in a mathematics curriculum.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26(2), 217–233.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Watson, R., Pattison, P., & Finch, S. (1993).Beginning statistics for psychology. London: Prentice Hall.
Webb, N. M. (1984). Sex differences in interaction and achievement in cooperative small groups.Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 33–44.
Whyte, J. (1986).Girls in science and technology: The story of a project. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Yager, S., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1985). Oral discussion, group-to-individual transfer, and achievement in cooperative learning groups.Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(1), 60–66.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smeh, K., Fawns, R. Classroom management of situated group learning: A research study of two teaching strategies. Research in Science Education 30, 225–240 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461630
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461630