Skip to main content
Log in

Power and sample size calculation for 2×2 tables under multinomial sampling with random loss

  • Published:
Test Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multinomial sampling, in which the total number of sampled subjects is fixed, is probably one of the most commonly used samplig schemes in categorical data analysis. When we apply multinomial sampling to collect subjects who are subject to a random exclusion from our data analysis, the number of subjects falling into each comparison group is random and can be small with a positive probability. Thus, the application of the traditional statistics derived from large sample theory for testing equality between two independent proportions can sometimes be theoretically invalid. On the other hand, using fisher's exact test can always assure that the true type I error is less than or equal to a nominal α-level. Thus, we discuss here power and sample size calculation based on this exact test. For a desired power at a given α-level, we develop an exact sample size calculation procedure, that accounts for a random loss of sampled subjects, for testing equality between two independent proportions under multinomial sampling. Because the exact sample size calculation procedure requires intensive computations when the underlying required sample size is large, we also present an approximate sample size formula using large sample theory. On the basis of Monte Carlo simulation, we note that the power of using this approximate sample size formula generally agrees well with the desired power on the basis of the exact test. Finally, we propose a trial-and-error procedure using the approximate sample size as an initial estimate and Monte Carlo simulation to expedite the procedure for searching the minimum required sample size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennett, B. andHsu, P. (1960). On the power function of the exact test for the 2×2 contingency table.Biometrika, 47:393–398.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Y., Fienberg, S., andHolland, P. (1975).Discrete Multivariate Analysis, Theory and Practice. MIT Press, Cambridge.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Casagrande, J., Pike, M., andSmith, P. (1978a). The power function of the “exact” test for comparing two binomial distributions.Applied Statistics, 27:176–180.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Casagrande, J., Pike, M., andSmith, P. (1978b). An improved approximate formula for comparing two binomial distributions.Biometrics, 34:483–486.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. (1935). The logic of inductive inference.Journal of Royal Statistical Society. Series A, 98:39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleiss, J. (1981).Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd edn. Wiley and Sons, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fleiss, J. L., Tytun, A., andUry, H. K. (1980). A simple approximation for calculating sample sizes for comparing independent proportions.Biometrics, 36:343–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gail, M. andGart, J. (1973). The determination of sample sizes for use with the exact conditional test in 2×2 comparative trials.Biometrics, 29:441–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, I. (1994). Sample size for two independent proportions: a review.Australian Journal of Statistics, 36:199–209.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Haseman, J. (1978). Exact sample sizes for use with the Fisher-Irwin test for 2×2 tables.Biometrics, 34:106–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, J. D. (1935). Test of significance for differences between percentages based on small numbers.Metron, 12:83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lui, K.-J. (1994). The effect of retaining probability variation on sample size calculations for normal variates.Biometrics, 50:297–300.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sahai, H. andKhurshid, A. (1996). Formulas and tables for determination of sample sizes and power in clinical trials for testing differences in proportions for the two-sample design: a review.Statistics in Medicine, 15:1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skalski, J. (1992). Sample size calculations for normal variates under binomial censoring.Biometrics, 48:877–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, F. (1934). Contingency tables involving small numbers and the χ2 test.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Supplement 1, pp. 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kung-Jong Lui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lui, KJ., Cumberland, W.G. Power and sample size calculation for 2×2 tables under multinomial sampling with random loss. Test 12, 141–152 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02595816

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02595816

Key Words

AMS subject classification

Navigation