Skip to main content
Log in

Tennis racket stiffness, string tension and impact velocity effects on post-impact ball angular velocity

  • Published:
Sports Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has been significant technological advancement in the game of tennis over the past two decades. In particular, tennis rackets have changed in size, shape and material composition. The effects of these changes on ball rebound speed have been well documented, but few studies have considered the effects on ball angular velocity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of three factors on post-impact ball spin. Tennis balls were projected at three velocities toward a clamped racket simulating three levels of stiffness and strung at three string tensions. The angular velocity of each tennis ball was measured from stroboscopic images during an oblique impact with the racket. A three-way factorial ANOVA revealed significant (P < 0.01) differences in the post-impact angular velocity for string tension, racket stiffness and impact velocity, as well as two-way interactions between string tension and impact velocity, and between racket stiffness and impact velocity. The possibility of tangential elastic strain energy being stored in the racket and ball was evident in low impact velocity trials. These displayed a post-impact angular velocity where the circumference of the ball was translating faster than the relative velocity between the ball’s centre of mass and the string surface. It was concluded that increasing the relative impact velocity between the racket and ball was the best means of increasing the post-impact angular velocity of the tennis ball.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, J. (1983) A mechanical analysis of a special class of rebound phenomena.Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise,15(3), 256–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. & Wilson, B. (1978) The effect of tennis racket stiffness and string tension on ball velocity after impact.The Research Quarterly,49(3), 255–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, R. & Sinclair, P. (1999) Tennis racquet stiffness and string tension effects on rebound velocity and angle for and oblique impact.Journal of Human Movement Studies,37, 271–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannigan, M. & Adali, S. (1981) Mathematical modelling and simulation of a tennis racket.Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise,13(1), 44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, H. (1979) Physics of the tennis racket.American Journal of Physics,47(6), 482–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, H. (1981) Physics of the tennis racket II: The ‘sweet spot’.American Journal of Physics,49(9), 816–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, H. (1997) The physics of tennis III. The ball-racket interaction.American Journal of Physics,65(10), 981–987.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, H., Cross, R. and Lindsey, C. (2002)The Physics and Technology of Tennis. United States Racquet Stringers Association, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R. (2002) Measurements of the horizontal coefficient of restitution for a superball and a tennis ball.American Journal of Physics,70(5), 482–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, B.C. (1982) The influence of tennis racket flexibility and string tension on rebound velocity following a dynamic impact.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,53(4), 277–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, B.C., Marsh, A.P. and Overheu, P.R. (1987) The Mechanics of the Lendl and conventional tennis forehands: A coach’s perspective.Sports Coach,11(2), 4–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, B.C., Marsh, A.P. and Overheu, P.R. (1989) The topspin backhand drive in tennis: A biomechanical analysis.Journal of Human Movement Studies,16(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwill, S.R. and Haake, S.J. (2004) Ball spin generation for oblique impacts with a tennis racket.Society for Experimental Mechanics,44(2), 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groppel, J., Dillman, C. and Lardner, T. (1983) Derivation and validation of equations of motion to predict ball spin upon impact in tennis.Journal of Sports Sciences,1, 111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groppel, J., Shin, I., Thomas, J. & Welk, G. (1987) The effects of string type and tension on impact in midsized and oversized tennis rackets.International Journal of Sport Biomechanics,3, 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatze, H. (1976) Forces and duration of impact, and grip tightness during the tennis stroke.Medicine & Science in Sports,8(2), 88–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatze, H. (1993) The relationship between the coefficient of restitution and energy losses in tennis rackets.Journal of Applied Biomechanics,9, 124–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, D. & Lu, W. (1992) Dynamics of the interactions between ball, strings and racket in tennis.International Journal of Sport Biomechanics,8, 181–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maw, N., Barber, J.R. & Fawcett, J.N. (1976) The oblique impact of elastic spheres.Wear,38, 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, C.A. & Baker, J.A. (1984) Spin imparted to a tennis ball during impact with conventionally and diagonally strung rackets.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,55(3), 261–266.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Bower.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bower, R., Sinclair, P. Tennis racket stiffness, string tension and impact velocity effects on post-impact ball angular velocity. Sports Eng 10, 111–122 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02844208

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02844208

Keywords

Navigation