References
Chan, Wing-tsit, trans. 1963.The Platform Scripture: The Basic Classic of Zen Buddhism. New York: Columbia University Press.
—. 1969.A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fang, Litian. 2000. “Zen Buddhism of theTathāgata and Zen Buddhism of the Master.Zhongguo Shehui Kexue. No. 5: 130–140.
Gregory, Peter. 1994. “Tsung-mi and the Problem ofHongaku shiso.”Annual Report of the Zen Institute (Komazawa University). No. 5: 200–151.
Hakamaya, Noriaki. 1989.Critique of Original Enlightenment Thought (Hongaku shiso hihan). Tokyo: Daizo Shupan.
Heidegger, Martin. 1966.Discourse on Thinking. Trans. by John Anderson. New York: Harper and Row.
Hu, Shi. 1953. “Ch’an (Zen) Buddhism in China.”Philosophy East and West 3: 3–24.
Huikai.The Gateless Gate. InDaizokyo 48.
Hubbard, James, & Paul Swanson, eds. 1997.Pruning the Bodhi Tree: Storm over Critical Buddhism. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Jan, Yun-hua. 1988.Zongmi. Taibei: Dongda Chubanshe.
Matsumoto, Shiro. 1977. “Critiques ofTathāgata Thought in Buddhist Philosophy.”Journal of the Faculty of Buddhism. Komazawa University. No.55: 232–215.
—. 1994.Critical Studies on Zen Thought (Zen shiso no hihanteki kenkyu). Tokyo: Taizo Shuppan.
-. 1996. “Buddha-nature as the Principle of Discrimination.”Komazawa Daigaku Bukkyugakubu Ronshu. No. 27: 328–296.
—. 1997a. “The Doctrine ofTathāgata-garhha Is Not Buddhist” Translated by Jaime Hubbard. In Jamie Hubbard and Paul Swanson, ed. Hawaii: Hawaii University Press.
-. 1997b. “Critiques of Tathāgatagarbha Thought in Buddhist Philosophy.”Journal of the Faculty of Buddhism. Komazawa University. No 55: 232–215.
-. 1999. “Critical Considerations on Zen Thought.”Annual Report of the Zen Institute. Komazawa University. No. 10: 238–217.
Mou, Zongsan. 1982.Buddha-Nature and Prajna. Taipei: Xuesheng Shuju.
Nāgājuna.Mādhyamika. InDaizokyo 30.
Nishitani, Keiji. 1982.Religion and Nothingness. Trans. by Jan Van Bragt. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Suzuki, Daisetz Teitaro. 1953. “Zen: A Reply to Hu Shih.”Philosophy East and West 3: 25–46.
Swanson, Paul. 1993. “‘Zen is Not Buddhism’: Recent Japanese Critiques of Buddha-Nature.”Numan 40: 115–149.
Zongmi.Preface to Origins of the Various Chan Teachings. Daizokyo 48.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Dedicated to Prof. Jan Yun-hua
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wing-cheuk, C. Mou Zongsan on Zen Buddhism. Dao 5, 73–88 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02857005
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02857005