Conclusion
The main reasons for the difficulty in understanding and translatingcheng may be summarized as follows. First, its prehistory is not always clear. This makes it troublesome to identify its original meaning. Second, the multiple sources from the three schools, Confucianism, Daoism, and Buddhism, often causecheng to be entangled with various concepts specifically affiliated to certain schools. The particular meanings of these concepts and their connections withcheng possibly mislead our effort to explore the core content ofcheng as such. Finally,cheng has been described as a force causing either “transformation” or “change.” In the former case, its influence is often exaggerated, while in the latter, it appears, more or less, mystical. However, despite all the complexity, the core content ofcheng is still identifiable. It consists of what two English terms-“sincerity” and “reality”-convey. In general, the termcheng can be properly applied to a person or thing so long as either one of them or the unity of them is present.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference
Berlin, Isaiah. 1997.The Proper Study of Mankind. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Bruce, J. P. 1923.Chu Hsi and His Masters: an Introduction to Chu Hsi and the Sung School of Chinese Philosophy. London: Probsthain.
Chan, Wing-Tsit. 1969.A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Chen, Chun. 1990.Chen Chun’s Analysis of Philosophical Terms. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju
Chen, Tingchuo 1959.A Criticism on lyric Poetry from Chen Tingchuo. Beijing:Renmin Wenxue Chubanshe.
Daxue. In Zhu 1983.
Fung, Yu-lan (FENG Youlan). 1953.A History of Chinese Philosophy, vol. II. Trans, by Derk Bodde. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
—. 1960.A Short History of Chinese Philosophy. Edited by Derk Bodde. New York: Macmillan Company.
Graham, A. C. 1958.Two Chinese Philosophers. London: Lund Humphries.
Guo Qingfan. 1961.Collected Commentaries on the Zhuangzi Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.(English translation by Burton Watson, New York: Columbia University Press 1964).
Guoyu. Shanghai Shida Guji Zhengli Yanjiu suo. Shanghai: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe 1998.
Hughes, E. R., trans. 1942. TheGreatLeaming and the Mean in Action. London: Dent.
Jiang, Jieshi 1937.Collected Works of Jiang Jieshi. Shanghai: Wenhua Bianyiguan.
Kang, Youwei. 1987.Subtleties of the Mencius. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.
Laozi. InAn Annotation and Explanation on the Laozi Edited by ZHU Qianzhi. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju 1984.
Li, Ao. 1963.Recovery of the Nature In theSelected Philosophical Works from the History of China: the Period from the Two Han Dynasties to the Sui and Tang Dynasties. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.
Lunyu. In Zhu 1983.
Mengzi In Zhu 1983 (English translation by D.C. Lau,The Mencius, Penguin Classics, 1970).
Metzger, Thomas A. 1977.Escape from Predicament. New York: Columbia University Press.
Mouzi.Disposing of Error InSelected Materials concerning the Thought of Chinese Buddhism. Ed. by SHI Jun etc., vol. I. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju, 1983.
Munro, Donald J. 1969.The Concept of Man in Early China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
—. 1988.Images of Human Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Needham, Joseph, 1956.Science and Civilization in China, vol. 2. Cambridge University Press.
Qian, Mu. ND.Collected Works of Mr. Qian Mu, vol. 18. Taipei: Lianjing Chuban Gongsi.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1953. TheConfessions. Trans. by J.M. Cohen. Penguin Classics.
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1977.No Exit and The Flies. Trans. by Stuart Cilbert. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Schwartz, Benjamin. 1985.The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
Tang, Yongtong. 1997.History of Buddhism in Han, Wei, Two Jins, and the South and North Dynasties. Beijing:Beijing Daxue Chubanshe.
Trilling, Lionel. 1972.Sincerity and Authenticity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Wang, Fuzhi. 1975.Discussions after Reading the Great Collection of the Commentaries on the Four Books. Beijing:Zhonghua Shuju.
Wieger, L. 1917.Histoire des Croyances Religieuses et des Opinions Philosophiques en Chine despuis l’origine jusqu’a nos jour. Hsienhsien: Mission Press. Werner, E. T. C. Eng trans. 1927. Hsienhsien.
Xiong, Shili. 1962.New Consciousness-only Theory. Taipei: Guangwen Shuju.
—. 1976.Essentials of Xiong Skill’s Philosophy, vol. I. Taipei: Guangwen Shuju.
Xu, Shen. 1963.Explanation of Script and Elucidation of Characters Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.
Yang, Bojun. 1979.Collected Commentaries on the Liezi. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.
—. 1981.Collected Commentaries on Zuo’s Commentary on the Spring and Autumn Annals. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju. (English translation by James Legge,The Chinese Classics, vol. 5. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press 1960).
Zhang, Dainian. 1983.An Introduction to the Methodologies for the History of Chinese Philosophy. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.
Zhou, Dunyi. 1969.Penetrating the Book of Changes In Wing-Tsit Chan.
Zhu, Xi. 1980.Book of Poetry with Zhu Xi’s Commentary. Shanghai: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe.
—. 1983.Collected Commentaries on the Four Books. Beijing:Zhonghua Shuju.
—. 1986.Recorded Conversations of Master Zhu. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yanming, A. The concept of Cheng and its western translations. Dao 4, 117–136 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02871086
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02871086