Abstract
THIS STUDY COMPARED the effects of microcomputer-based software and hand-held calculators on the statistics achievement of university males and females. The subjects, 50 graduate students enrolled in univariate statistics classes at a public, comprehensive university, were randomly assigned to groups that used either microcomputer-based software or hand-held calculators in performing their statistical calculations. The effects of the independent variables of microcomputer-based software and hand-held calculators on the dependent variable of statistics achievement were analyzed with an independent t-test and a two-way analysis of variance. Results of the independent t-test and a two-way analysis of variance. Results of the independent t-test revealed no significant difference between the achievement of students who used hand-held calculators and those who used microcomputer-based software (p=.556). Furthermore, the two-way analysis of variance revealed no significant difference on the basis of gender (p=.993); however, a significant interaction effect (p=.013) was disclosed. The effect size of 0.912 indicates that, on the average, those males who used microcomputers outperformed 82% of the females who used microcomputers in performing their statistical calculations; while the females who used calculators outperformed 71% of the male users of calculators, on the basis of an effect size calculation of 0.545.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker, J. (1986).Instructional uses of school computers: Reports from the 1985 national survey.Baltimore:John Hopkins University, Center for the Social Organization of Schools.
Borg, W., &Gall, M. (1989).Educational Research: An Introduction.White Plains, NY:Longman.
Bunderson, E.D., &Christensen, M.E. (1996).An analysis of retention problems for female students in university computer science programs. Journal of Research on Computing in Education,28(1),1–17.
Burns, P., &Bozeman, W. (1981).Computer-assisted instruction and mathematics achievement: Is there a relationship? Educational Technology,21(10),32–40.
Cohen, J. (1977).Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.New York:Academic Press.
Cole, D., &Hannifin, M. (1983).An analysis of why students select introductory high school computer coursework.Educational Technology,23 (4), 26–29.
Harris, J.B., &Grandgenett, N. (1996).Correlates among teachers’ anxieties, demographics, and telecomputing activity.Journal of Research on Computing in Education,28(3),301–317.
Hartley, S. (1977).Meta-analysis of the effects of individually paced instruction on math (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Colorado, 1977).Dissertation Abstracts International,38,4003.
Kerr, S. (1996).Visions of sugarplums: The future of technology, education, and the schools.Technology and the Future of Schooling: National Society for the Study of Education,95(2),1–27.
Lorimer, K.V. (1996).Education, Knowledge and the Computer.San Diego, CA:Link-Frame Publishing.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989).Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA:The Council.
Patterson, J., &Smith, M. (1986).The role of computers in higher-order thinking.Microcomputers and Education: National Society for the Study of Education,85(1),81–108.
Pollina, A. (1995).Gender balance: Lessons from girls in science and mathematics.Educational Leadership,53(1),30–33.
Roblyer, M. (1985).Measuring the Impact of Computers in Instruction: A Non-technical Review of Research for Educators.Washington, DC:Association for Educational Data Systems.
Segal, H. (1996).The American ideology of technological progress: Historical perspectives.Technology and the Future of Schooling: National Society for the Study of Education,95(2),28–48.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
Edwin P. Christmann is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Secondary Education/Foundations of Education at Slippery Rock University, where he teaches graduate-level courses in science education, statistics, and educational technology.
Dr. Christmann has published several articles that explore the effect of technology on learning and is a frequent speaker at international, national, and regional education and educational technology conferences.
John L. Badgett is a Professor in the Department of Secondary Education/Foundations of Education at Slippery Rock University, where he teaches graduate courses in quantitative research, qualitative research, and social foundations of education, as well as an undergraduate course in measurement and evaluation.
Dr. Badgett has published on the relationship between intelligence scores and personality variables, and on the effect of different instructional methodologies on student learning.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Christmann, E.P., Badgett, J.L. The effects of computers and calculators on male and female statistics achievement. J. Comput. High. Educ. 9, 49–58 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02948777
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02948777