Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Long-Delayed Aftershocks in New Zealand and the 2016 M7.8 Kaikoura Earthquake

  • Published:
Pure and Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study aftershock sequences of six major earthquakes in New Zealand, including the 2016 M7.8 Kaikaoura and 2016 M7.1 North Island earthquakes. For Kaikaoura earthquake, we assess the expected number of long-delayed large aftershocks of M5+ and M5.5+ in two periods, 0.5 and 3 years after the main shocks, using 75 days of available data. We compare results with obtained for other sequences using same 75-days period. We estimate the errors by considering a set of magnitude thresholds and corresponding periods of data completeness and consistency. To avoid overestimation of the expected rates of large aftershocks, we presume a break of slope of the magnitude–frequency relation in the aftershock sequences, and compare two models, with and without the break of slope. Comparing estimations to the actual number of long-delayed large aftershocks, we observe, in general, a significant underestimation of their expected number. We can suppose that the long-delayed aftershocks may reflect larger-scale processes, including interaction of faults, that complement an isolated relaxation process. In the spirit of this hypothesis, we search for symptoms of the capacity of the aftershock zone to generate large events months after the major earthquake. We adapt an algorithm EAST, studying statistics of early aftershocks, to the case of secondary aftershocks within aftershock sequences of major earthquakes. In retrospective application to the considered cases, the algorithm demonstrates an ability to detect in advance long-delayed aftershocks both in time and space domains. Application of the EAST algorithm to the 2016 M7.8 Kaikoura earthquake zone indicates that the most likely area for a delayed aftershock of M5.5+ or M6+ is at the northern end of the zone in Cook Strait.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aki, K. (1965). Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula log N = a − b M and its confidence limits. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, 43, 237–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baranov, S. V., & Shebalin, P. N. (2016). Forecasting aftershock activity: 1. Adaptive estimates based on the Omori and Gutenberg–Richter laws. Izvestiya-Physics of the Solid Earth, 52(3), 413–431. doi:10.1134/S1069351316020038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baranov, S. V., & Shebalin, P. N. (2017). Forecasting aftershock activity: 2. Estimating the area prone to strong aftershocks. Izvestiya-Physics of the Solid Earth. doi:10.7868/S0002333717020028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, B. (1983). Maximum likelihood estimation of b-values for magnitude grouped data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 73, 831–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattania, C., Hainzl, S., Wang, L., Roth, F., & Enescu, B. (2014). Propagation of Coulomb stress uncertainties in physics-based aftershock models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 119(10), 7846–7864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekström, G., Nettles, M., & Dziewonski, A. M. (2012). The global CMT project 2004–2010: Centroid-moment tensors for 13,017 earthquakes. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 200–201, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2012.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J. K., & Knopoff, L. (1974). Is the sequence of earthquakes in southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 64, 1363–1367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstenberger, M., & Rhoades, D. (2010). New Zealand earthquake forecast testing centre. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 167(8–9), 877–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstenberger, M. C., Wiemer, S., Jones, L. M., & Reasenberg, P. A. (2005). Real-time forecasts of tomorrow’s earthquakes in California. Nature, 435, 328–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg, B., & Richter, C. F. (1954). Seismicity of the Earth and associated phenomena (Vol. ix, p. 310). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hainzl, S. (2016). Rate-dependent incompleteness of earthquake catalogs. Seismological Research Letters, 96(2A), 337–344. doi:10.1785/0220150211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harte, D. S. (2014). An ETAS model with varying productivity rates. Geophysical Journal International, 198(1), 270–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmstetter, A., Kagan, Y. Y., & Jackson, D. D. (2006). Comparison of short-term and time-independent earthquake forecast models for southern California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 96(1), 90–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holschneider, M., Narteau, C., Shebalin, P., Peng, Z., & Schorlemmeret, D. (2012). Bayesian analysis of the modified Omori law. Journal of Geophysical Research, 117, B05317. doi:10.1029/2011JB009054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narteau, C. (2007). Classification of seismic patterns in a hierarchical model of rupture: A new phase diagram for seismicity. Geophysical Journal International, 167, 710–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narteau, C., Byrdina, S., Shebalin, P., & Schorlemmer, D. (2009). Common dependence on stress for the two fundamental laws of statistical seismology. Nature, 462(7273), 642–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narteau, C., Shebalin, P., & Holschneider, M. (2005). Onset of the power law aftershock decay rate in Southern California. Geophysical Research Letters, 32, L22312. doi:10.1029/2005GL023951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narteau, C., Shebalin, P., & Holschneider, M. (2008). Loading rates in California inferred from aftershocks. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 15, 245–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogata, Y. (1983). Estimation of the parameters in the modified Omori formula for aftershock frequencies by the maximum likelihood procedure. Journal of Physics of the Earth, 31, 115–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omi, T., Ogata, Y., Hirata, Y., & Aihara, K. (2013). Forecasting large aftershocks within one day after the main shock. Scientific Reports. doi:10.1038/srep02218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omi, T., Ogata, Y., Shiomi, K., Enescu, B., Sawazaki, K., & Aihara, K. (2016). Automatic aftershock forecasting: A test using real-time seismicity data in Japan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. doi:10.1785/0120160100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reasenberg, P. A., & Jones, L. M. (1989). Earthquake hazard after a mainshock in California. Science, 242(4895), 1173–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, D. A. (2013). Mixture models for improved earthquake forecasting with short-to-medium time-horizons. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 103(4), 2203–2215. doi:10.1785/0120120233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, D. A., Christophersen, A., & Gerstenberger, M. C. (2016). Multiplicative earthquake likelihood models based on fault and earthquake data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 105(6). doi:10.1785/0120150080.

  • Rhoades, D. A., Gerstenberger, M. C., Christophersen, A., Zechar, J. D., Schorlemmer, D., Werner, M. J., et al. (2014). Regional earthquake likelihood models II: Information gains of multiplicative hybrids. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 104(6), 3072–3083. doi:10.1785/0120140035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shebalin, P. N. (2004). Aftershocks as indicators of the state of stress in a fault system. Doklady Earth Sciences, 398, 978–982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shebalin, P., Narteau, C., & Holschneider, M. (2012). From alarm-based to rate-based earthquake forecast models. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 102(1), 64–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shebalin, P., Narteau, C., Holschneider, M., & Schorlemmer, D. (2011). Short-term earthquake forecasting using early aftershock statistics. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 101(4), 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shebalin, P. N., Narteau, C., Zechar, J. D., & Holschneider, M. (2014). Combining earthquake forecasts using differential probability gains. Earth, Planets and Space, 66(37), 1–14. doi:10.1186/1880-5981-66-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steacy, S., Gerstenberger, M. C., Williams, C., Rhoades, D. A., & Christophersen, A. (2014). A new hybrid Coulomb/statistical model for forecasting aftershock rates. Geophysical Journal International, 196(2), 918–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tormann, T., Enescu, B., Woessner, J., & Wiemer, S. (2015). Randomness of megathrust earthquakes implied by rapid stress recovery after the Japan earthquake. Nature Geosciences, 8, 152–158. doi:10.1038/ngeo2343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuboi, C. (1956). Earthquake energy, earthquake volume, aftershock area, and strength of the Earth’s crust. Journal of Physics of the Earth, 4, 63–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utsu, T. (1961). A statistical study on the occurrence of aftershocks. Geophysical Magazine, 30, 521–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorobieva, I., Narteau, C., Shebalin, P., Beauducel, F., Nercessian, A., Clouard, V., et al. (2013). Multiscale mapping of completeness magnitude of earthquake catalogs. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 103, 2188–2202. doi:10.1785/0120120132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vorobieva, I., Shebalin, P., & Narteau, C. (2016). Break of slope in earthquake size distribution and creep rate along the San Andreas Fault system. Geophysical Research Letters. doi:10.1002/2016GL069636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Hainzl, S., Sinan Özeren, M., & Ben-Zion, Y. (2010). Postseismic deformation induced by brittle rock damage of aftershocks. Journal of Geophysical Research, 115, B10422. doi:10.1029/2010JB007532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, D. L., & Coppersmith, K. J. (1994). New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84(4), 974–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, M., Marzocchi, W., Taroni, M., Zechar, J., Gerstenberger, M., Liukis, M., et al. (2015). Retrospective evaluation of time-dependent earthquake forecasting models during the 2010–12 Canterbury, New Zealand, earthquake sequence. SECED 2015 Conference: Earthquake Risk and Engineering towards a Resilient World 9–10 July 2015, Cambridge UK. http://www.seced.org.uk/images/newsletters/WERNER,%20MARZOCCHI,%20et%20al.pdf.

  • Wiemer, S., & Wyss, M. (2000). Minimum magnitude of completeness in earthquake catalogs: Examples from Alaska, the western United States, and Japan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90(4), 859–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Russian Science foundation, project No. 16-17-00093. We acknowledge the New Zealand GeoNet project and its sponsors EQC, GNS Science and LINZ, for providing data used in this study. We thank an anonymous reviewer for reading the paper and suggesting useful improvements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

    P. Shebalin

  2. Kola Branch of the Geophysical Survey of Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Russia

    S. Baranov

Authors
  1. P. Shebalin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Baranov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Shebalin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shebalin, P., Baranov, S. Long-Delayed Aftershocks in New Zealand and the 2016 M7.8 Kaikoura Earthquake. Pure Appl. Geophys. 174, 3751–3764 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1608-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1608-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation