Skip to main content
Log in

A Generalization of the Stochastic Summation Scheme of Small Earthquakes to Simulate Strong Ground Motions

  • Published:
Pure and Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A generalization of the stochastic summation scheme of small earthquakes following a general form of the source spectrum (ωn) model is developed to estimate the proper probability density functions for rupture propagation over the fault and to simulate site-specific strong ground motions in two independent stages. The probability density functions for rupture propagation are first developed for a single-corner-frequency source model, and then extended to multiplicative and additive double-corner-frequency source models to partially account for the effects of finite-fault rupture such as fault geometry, rise time, and rupture time on ground motions, and to better match observed Fourier amplitude spectra (FAS). The generalized two-stage stochastic summation scheme developed in this study can be used to simulate realistic strong-ground-motion time histories from small events, represented as empirical Green’s functions (EGFs), by specifying only two source parameters of the seismic moment and stress drop for a given site. The proposed two-stage stochastic summation schemes are tested using numerical examples following the theoretical source models as well as observed ground motions of the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku earthquake in Japan and the 1994 Mw 6.7 Northridge earthquake in California to verify the applicability of the approach. Comparisons between the observed and simulated time histories for these two earthquakes, their response spectra, and FAS show satisfactory performance of the proposed approach for engineering purposes. The results of these comparisons indicate that the proposed stochastic summation of small events as EGFs can adequately replicate observed ground motions and evaluate uncertainties in ground motions with the generation of many time history realizations corresponding to a multitude of possible rupture processes . The proposed approach can also be used to generate multiple realistic acceleration time histories matched on average to the target response spectra for use in earthquake performance design, and to develop ground-motion models for low-seismicity regions, where there is a lack of recording of strong ground motions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aki, K. (1967). The scaling law of seismic spectrum. Journal of Geophysical Research, 72, 1217–1231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aki, K., & Richards, P. G. (2002). Quantitative seismology (2nd ed.). Sausalito: University Science Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allmann, B. P., & Shearer, P. M. (2009). Global variations of stress drop for moderate to large earthquakes. Journal of Geophysical Research, 114(B01), 310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archuleta, R. J., & Ji, C. (2016). Moment rate scaling for earthquakes 3.3 ≤ M ≤ 5.3 with implications for stress drop. Geophysical Research Letters, 43, 12005–12011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, G. (1993). Source spectra for earthquakes in eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 83, 1778–1798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, G. M., Assatourians, K., Boore, D. M., Campbell, K., & Motazedian, D. (2009). A guide to differences between stochastic point-source and stochastic finite-fault simulations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 99(6), 3192–3201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, G. M., & Boore, D. (1995). New ground motion relations for Eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 85, 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, G. M., & Boore, D. M. (1998). Evaluation of models for earthquake source spectra in eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 88, 917–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, G. M., & Silva, W. (2000). Stochastic modeling of California ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90, 255–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, G. M., & Sonley, E. (2003). Ground-motions for the M 5.0 Au sable Forks earthquake. Seismological Research Letters, 74, 339–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boatwright, J. (1988). The seismic radiation from composite models of faulting. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 78, 489–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boatwright, J. (1994). Regional propagation characteristics and source parameters of earthquakes in northeastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boatwright, J., & Seekins, L. (2011). Regional spectral analysis of three moderate earthquakes in northeastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 101, 1769–1782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore, D. M. (1983). Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 73, 1865–1894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore, D. M. (2003). Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 160, 635–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore, D. M. (2009). Comparing stochastic point-source and finite-source ground-motion simulations: SMSIM and EXSIM. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 99, 3202–3216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore, D. M., Di Alessandro, C., & Abrahamson, N. A. (2014). A generalization of the double-corner-frequency source spectral model and its use in the SCEC BBP validation exercise. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 104(5), 2387–2398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brune, J. N. (1970). Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes. Journal of Geophysical Research, 75, 4997–5009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brune, J. N. (1971). Correction. Journal of Geophysical Research, 76, 5002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, F., Archuleta, R., & Causse, M. (2013). What is sigma of the stress drop? Seismological Research Letters, 84(1), 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courboulex, F., Vallée, M., Causse, M., & Chounet, A. (2016). Stress-drop variability of shallow earthquakes extracted from a global database of source time functions. Seismological Research Letters, 87(4), 912–918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dan, K., Watanabe, T., Tanaka, T., & Sato, R. (1990). Stability of earthquake ground motion synthesized by using different small-event records as empirical Green’s functions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 80, 1433–1455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eshelby, J. (1957). The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, 241(1226), 376–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evernden, J. F. (1977). Spectral characteristics of the P codas of Eurasian earthquakes and explosions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 67, 1153–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, A. (1995). Simulating strong motions of large earthquakes using recordings of small earthquakes: the Loma Prieta mainshock as a test case. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 85(4), 1144–1160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, A. (2017). Modeling strong-motion recordings of the 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule, Chile, earthquake with high stress-drop subevents and background slip. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 107(1), 372–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frasier, C. W., & North, R. G. (1978). Evidence for w-cube scaling from amplitudes and periods of the Rat Island sequence (1965). Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 68, 265–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, D., Singh, K., Herráiz, M., Pacheco, J., & Ordaz, M. (2004). Inslab earthquakes of Central Mexico: Q, source spectra, and stress drop. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 94, 789–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller, R. J. (1976). Scaling relations for earthquake source parameters and magnitudes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 66, 1501–1521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghofrani, H., Atkinson, G., Goda, K., & Assatourians, K. (2013). Stochastic finite-fault simulations of the 2011 Tohoku, Japan, earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 103, 1307–1320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godano, M., Bernard, P., & Dublanchet, P. (2015). Bayesian inversion of seismic spectral ratio for source scaling: Application to a persistent multiplet in the western Corinth rift. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 120, 7683–7712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusev, A. A. (1983). Descriptive statistical model of earthquake source radiation and its application to an estimation of short-period strong motion. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 74, 787–808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks, T. C., & McGuire, R. K. (1981). The character of high frequency strong ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 71, 2071–2095.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell, S. H. (1978). Earthquake aftershocks as Green’s functions. Geophysical Research Letters, 5, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell, S. H. (1982). Simulation of ground accelerations for the May 1980 Mammoth Lakes, California, earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 72, 2381–2387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell, S. H., & Heaton, T. H. (1985). Teleseismic time functions for large shallow subduction zone earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 75, 965–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashash, Y. M. A, Phillips, C., & D. R. Groholski. (2010). Recent advances in non-linear site response analysis. In International conferences on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics.

  • Hutchings, L. (1991). Prediction of strong ground motion for the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake using empirical Green’s functions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 81, 88–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, L. (1994). Kinematic earthquake models and synthesized ground motion using empirical Green’s functions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84(4), 1028–1050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, L., & Viegas, G. (2012). Application of empirical Green’s functions in earthquake source, wave propagation and strong motion studies. In S. D’Amico (Ed.), Earthquake Research and Analysis-New Frontiers in Seismology (pp. 87–140). Rijeka: InTech. ISBN 978-953-307-840-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, L., & Wu, F. (1990). Empirical Green’s functions from small earthquakes: waveform study of locally recorded aftershocks of the San Fernando earthquake. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95, 1187–1214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ide, S., Beroza, G. C., Shelly, D. R., & Uchide, T. (2007). A scaling law for slow earthquakes. Nature, 447, 76–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irikura, K. (1983). Semi-empirical estimation of strong ground motions during large earthquakes. Bulletin of Disaster Prevention Research Institute (Kyoto University), 32, 63–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irikura, K. (1986). Prediction of strong acceleration motion using empirical Green’s function. In Proceedings of the 7th Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium, vol 151, pp. 151–156.

  • Jaimes, M. A., Reinoso, E., & Ordaz, M. (2008). Empirical Green’s functions modified by attenuation for sources located at intermediate and far distances from the original source. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 12(4), 584–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyner, W. B. (1984). A scaling law for the spectra of large earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 74(4), 1167–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyner, W. B., & Boore, D. M. (1986). On simulating large earthquakes by Green’s function addition of smaller earthquakes. In S. Das, J. Boatwright, & C. H. Scholtz (Eds.), Earthquake source mechanics (Vol. 37, pp. 269–274)., Maurice Ewing Series 6 Washington, D.C.: American Geophysical Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohrs-Sansorny, C., Courboulex, F., Bour, M., & Deschamps, A. (2005). A two-stage method for strong ground motions simulations using stochastic summation of small earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95, 1387–1400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurahashi, S., & Irikura, K. (2011). Source model for generating strong ground motions during the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake. Earth Planets Space, 63, 571–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madariaga, R. (1976). Dynamics of an expanding circular fault. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 66, 639–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munguia, L., & Brune, J. N. (1984). Simulations of strong ground motion for earthquakes in the Mexicali-Imperial Valley region. Geophysical Journal International, 79, 747–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niño, M., Ayala, G., & Ordaz, M. (2018). Ground-motion simulation by the empirical Green’s function method with a source defined by two corner frequencies and a two-stage summation scheme. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 108(2), 901–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttli, O. W. (1983). Average seismic source-parameter relations for mid-plate earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 73(2), 519–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordaz, M., Arboleda, J., & Singh, S. K. (1995). A scheme of random summation of an empirical Green’s function to estimate ground motions from future large earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 85, 1635–1647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedaghati, F. (2018). Simulation of strong ground motions using the stochastic summation of small to moderate earthquakes as Green’s functions, Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee.

  • Sedaghati, F., & Pezeshk, S. (2016). Estimation of the coda-wave attenuation and geometrical spreading in the New Madrid seismic zone. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 106(4), 1482–1498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedaghati, F., Pezeshk, S., & Nazemi, N. (2018). Site amplification within the Mississippi embayment of the central United States: Investigation of possible differences among various phases of seismic waves and presence of basin waves. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 113, 534–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyhan, E., & Stewart, J. P. (2014). Semi-empirical nonlinear site amplification from NGA-West2 data and simulations. Earthquake Spectra, 30(3), 1241–1256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearer, P. M. (2017). Analysis of Southern California Seismicity Using: (1) Swarms as Transient Detectors, (2) Coda waves for Q Structure and Source Properties, USGS Final Technical Report, Award G16AP00148.

  • Singh, S. K., Iglesias, A., Ordaz, M., Perez-Campos, X., & Quintanar, L. (2011). Estimation of ground motion in Mexico City from a repeat of the M 7.0 Acambay Earthquake of 1912. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 101(5), 2015–2028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavakoli, B., Sedaghati, F., & Pezeshk, S. (2018). An Analytical effective point source-based distance conversion approach to mimic the effects of extended faults on seismic hazard assessment. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 108(2), 742–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumarkin, A. G., & Archuleta, R. J. (1994). Empirical ground motion prediction. Ann. of Geofis., 37, 1691–1720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchide, T., & Imanishi, K. (2016). Small earthquakes deviate from the omega-square model as revealed by multiple spectral ratio analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 106(3), 1357–1363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallée, M. (2013). Source time function properties indicate a strain drop independent of earthquake depth and magnitude. Nature Communications, 4(1), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wennerberg, L. (1990). Stochastic summation of empirical Green’s functions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 80, 1418–1432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F. T. (1978). Prediction of strong ground motion using small earthquakes. In Proceedings of 2nd international microzonation conference, vol 2, pp. 70l–704.

  • Wu, F. T. (1981). Ground motion prediction and Eastern U.S. Earthquake Monitoring, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Rept. 81-944, pp. 1–6.

  • Yenier, E., & Atkinson, G. M. (2014). Equivalent point-source modeling of moderate-to-large magnitude earthquakes and associated ground-motion saturation effects. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 104(3), 1458–1478.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our sincere appreciation to Martin Chapman, Chris Cramer, and Roger Meier for constructive suggestions on an early version of this paper. This project was supported by the Tennessee Department of Transportation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farhad Sedaghati.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Appendix

Appendix

This appendix explains how the user can generate random numbers with the probability distribution functions, p(t), proposed in this study. In this regard, the first step is to obtain the cumulative distribution function, P(t), as

$$ 0 \le P\left( t \right) = \mathop \int \limits_{ - \infty }^{t} p\left( \tau \right){\text{d}}\tau \le 1, $$

where τ is time. Then, in the second step, a random number with the desired pdf, tj, is obtained from the inverse of cdf, P−1, as

$$ t_{j} = P^{ - 1} \left( {u_{j} } \right) $$

in which uj is a random number with a uniform distribution in [0, 1].

When the cdf cannot be analytically derived, numerical integration is used instead. Note that because the proposed pdfs are symmetric, p(−t) = p(t) and P(−t) = 1 − P(t). The user can create a table of t and its corresponding P(t) with a sufficient time-step resolution instead of solving a parametric equation. Since the t − P(t) is constructed, its inverse function can be numerically obtained by finding the closest t satisfying u = P(t).

Three MATLAB functions “SCF_distribution.m”, “ADCF_distribution.m”, and “MDCF_distribution.m”, as well as a script with some examples, are provided as supplementary materials to generate random numbers following single-, additive double-, and multiplicative double-corner-frequency source models, respectively. In addition, the Python code is provided to produce random numbers and to replicate the numerical examples performed in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sedaghati, F., Tavakoli, B. & Pezeshk, S. A Generalization of the Stochastic Summation Scheme of Small Earthquakes to Simulate Strong Ground Motions. Pure Appl. Geophys. 177, 3713–3732 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02499-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02499-9

Keywords

Navigation