Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
Die perkutane sakroiliakale (SI-)Verschraubung birgt ein hohes Risiko an Implantatfehllagen. Jedoch existieren bisher nur idealisierte Vorstellungen über die Form des nutzbaren Knochenkorridors.
Methodik
Anhand der 3D-CT-Rekonstruktion eines humanen Beckens wurden als Summe sämtlicher sicherer Schraubenlagen in Abhängigkeit von der Penetrationstiefe im Sakrum rechnergestützt 2 SI-Korridormodelle generiert.
Ergebnisse
Bei Schraubenplatzierung ins Zentrum des Sakralkörpers S1 waren ein Knochenvolumen von 121 cm3 und eine iliakale Eintrittsfläche von 53 cm2 nutzbar. Bei Schraubenlagen bis zum gegenseitigen Isthmus reduzierten sich diese auf 72 cm3 (60%) bzw. 20 cm2 (38%).
Schlussfolgerung
Die erarbeiteten realistischen 3D-Modelle geben exakte Hinweise auf den Einfluss knöcherner Grenzstrukturen für sichere Schraubenlagen. Durch die Implementation eines Softwarealgorithmus zur Errechnung des individuellen Korridors anhand von Fluoroskopie- oder CT-Images ist eine bessere Performance von Navigationssystemen für die SI-Verschraubung denkbar.
Abstract
Background
Minimally invasive sacroiliac (SI) screw fixation carries a high risk for implant malposition. Only idealised shape conceptions of the safe bony corridor exist.
Methods
Two SI corridor models were generated based on a 3D CT reconstruction of a human pelvis. Therefore two penetration depths of the screws into the sacrum were defined.
Results
By inserting screws into the centre of the first sacral body an osseous volume of 121 cm3 and an iliac entrance area of 53 cm2 were utilizable. Screw positioning beyond the opposite sacral isthmus leads to a reduction of the bony volume to 72 cm3 (60%) and a decrease of the iliac screw entrance to 20 cm2 (38%).
Conclusion
The computed realistic 3D models provide exact references to confining bone structures for safe screw positions. The implementation of a software algorithm for fully automated calculation of such volumes based on fluoroscopic or CT images could enhance the performance of computer-assisted navigation systems.
Literatur
Arand M, Kinzl L, Gebhard F (2004) Computer-guidance in percutaneous screw stabilization of the iliosacral joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 422: 201–207
Bellabarba C, Schildhauer TA, Vaccaro AR, Chapman JR (2006) Complications associated with surgical stabilization of high-grade sacral fracture dislocations with spino-pelvic instability. Spine 31(11 Suppl): 80–88
Blake-Toker AM, Hawkins L, Nadalo L et al. (2001) CT guided percutaneous fixation of sacroiliac fractures in trauma patients. J Trauma 51(6): 1117–1121
Carlson DA, Scheid DK, Maar DC et al. (2000) Safe placement of S1 and S2 iliosacral screws: the „vestibule“ concept. J Orthop Trauma 14(4): 264–269
Cecil ML, Rollins JR Jr, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting RA (1996) Projection of the S2 pedicle onto the posterolateral surface of the ilium. A technique for lag screw fixation of sacral fractures or sacroiliac joint dislocations. Spine 21(7): 875–878
Day CS, Prayson MJ, Shuler TE et al. (2000) Transsacral versus modified pelvic landmarks for percutaneous iliosacral screw placement--a computed tomographic analysis and cadaveric study. Am J Orthop 29(9 Suppl): 16–21
Denis F, Davis S, Comfort T (1988) Sacral fractures: an important problem. Retrospective analysis of 236 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 227: 67–81
Duwelius PJ, Van Allen M, Bray TJ, Nelson D (1992) Computed tomography-guided fixation of unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions. J Orthop Trauma 6(4): 420–426
Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Biyani A, Nadaud MC (1997) Morphologic considerations of the first sacral pedicle for iliosacral screw placement. Spine 22(8): 841–846
Gautier E, Bächler R, Heini PF, Nolte LP (2001) Accuracy of computer-guided screw fixation of the sacroiliac joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 393: 310–317
Goldstein A, Phillips T, Sclafani SJ et al. (1986) Early open reduction and internal fixation of the disrupted pelvic ring. J Trauma 26(4): 325–333
Grützner PA, Rose E, Vock B et al. (2002) Computer-assistierte perkutane Verschraubung des hinteren Beckenrings. Erste Erfahrungen mit einem Bildwandler basierten optoelektronischen Navigationssystem. Unfallchirurg 105(3): 254–260
Kraemer W, Hearn T, Tile M, Powell J (1994) The effect of thread length and location on extraction strengths of iliosacral lag screws. Injury 25(1): 5–9
Messmer P, Matthews F, Jacob AL et al. (2007) A CT Database for Research, Development and Education: Concept and Potential. J Digit Imag 20(1): 17–22
Moed BR, Geer BL (2006) S2 Iliosacral screw fixation for disruptions of the posterior pelvic ring: A report of 49 cases. J Orthop Trauma 20(6): 378–383
Noojin FK, Malkani AL, Haikal L et al. (2000) Cross-sectional geometry of the sacral ala for safe insertion of iliosacral lag screws: a computed tomography model. J Orthop Trauma 14(1): 31–35
Reilly MC, Bono CM, Litkouhi B et al. (2003) The effect of sacral fracture malreduction on the safe placement of iliosacral screws. J Orthop Trauma 17(2): 88–94
Routt ML Jr, Simonian PT, Agnew SG, Mann FA (1996) Radiographic recognition of the sacral alar slope for optimal placement of iliosacral screws: a cadaveric and clinical study. J Orthop Trauma 10(3): 171–177
Routt ML Jr, Simonian PT, Mills WJ (1997) Iliosacral screw fixation: early complications of the percutaneous technique. J Orthop Trauma 11(8): 584–589
Schep NW, Haverlag R, van Vugt AB (2004) Computer-assisted versus conventional surgery for insertion of 96 cannulated iliosacral screws in patients with postpartum pelvic pain. J Trauma 57(6): 1299–1302
Smith SA, Abitbol JJ, Carlson GD et al. (1993) The effects of depth of penetration, screw orientation, and bone density on sacral screw fixation. Spine 18(8): 1006–1010
Stöckle U, König B, Schaffler A et al. (2006) Klinische Erfahrungen mit dem Siremobil Iso-C3D-Bildwandler in der Beckenchirurgie. Unfallchirurg 109(1): 30–40
Templeman D, Schmidt A, Freese J, Weisman I (1996) Proximity of iliosacral screws to neurovascular structures after internal fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 329: 194–198
Tile M (1984) Fractures of the Pelvis and Acetabulum. Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1–170
Tonetti J, Cazal C, Eid A et al. (2004) Neurological damage in pelvic injuries: a continuous prospective series of 50 pelvic injuries treated with an iliosacral lag screw. Rev Chir Orthop Reparat Apparat Mot 90(2): 122–131
Van den Bosch EW, van Zwienen CM, van Vugt AB (2002) Fluoroscopic positioning of sacroiliac screws in 88 patients. J Trauma 53(1): 44–48
Waldrop JT, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting RA, Jackson WT (1993) The location of the sacroiliac joint on the outer table of the posterior ilium. J Orthop Trauma 7(6): 510–513
Xu R, Ebraheim NA, Douglas K, Yeasting RA (1996) The projection of the lateral sacral mass on the outer table of the posterior ilium. Spine 21(7): 790–794
Xu R, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting RA et al. (1995) Morphometric evaluation of the first sacral vertebra and the projection of its pedicle on the posterior aspect of the sacrum. Spine 20(8): 936–940
Ziran BH, Smith WR, Towers J, Morgan SJ (2003) Iliosacral screw fixation of the posterior pelvic ring using local anaesthesia and computerised tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85(3): 411–418
Interessenkonflikt
Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mendel, T., Appelt, K., Kuhn, P. et al. Der sakroiliakale Knochenkorridor. Unfallchirurg 111, 19–26 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-007-1386-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-007-1386-4