Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ex-situ Bioremediation of Crude Oil in Soil, a Comparative Kinetic Analysis

  • Published:
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Weathered crude oil (WCO) removals in shoreline sediment samples were monitored for 60 days in bioremediation experimentation. Experimental modeling was carried out using statistical design of experiments. At optimum conditions maximum of 83.13, 78.06 and 69.92% WCO removals were observed for 2, 16 and 30 g/kg initial oil concentrations, respectively. Significant variations in the crude oil degradation pattern were observed with respect to oil, nutrient and microorganism contents. Crude oil bioremediation were successfully described by a first-order kinetic model. The study indicated that the rate of hydrocarbon biodegradation increased with decrease of crude oil concentrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz E (2004) Bacterial degradation of aromatic pollutants: a paradigm of metabolic versatility. Int Microbiol 7:1139–6709

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang L, Mab T, Li D, Liang F, Liu R, Li G (2008) Optimization of nutrient component for diesel oil degradation by Rhodococcus erythropolis. Mar Pollut Bull 56:1714–1718

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Choi D, Sim D, Oh Y (2005) Evaluation of bioremediation effectiveness on crude oil-contaminated sand. Chemosphere 59:845–852

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leahy JG, Colwell RR (1990) Microbial degradation of hydrocarbons in the environment. Microbiol Rev 54:305–315

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lepo JE, Cripe CR, Kavanaugh JL, Zhang S, Norton GP (2003) The effect of amount of crude oil on extent of its biodegradation in open water- and sandy beach-laboratory simulations. Environ Technol 24:1291–1302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin X, Li X, Sun T, Li P, Zhou Q, Sun L (2009) Changes in microbial populations and enzyme activities during the bioremediation of oil-contaminated soil. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 83:542–547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Hao RX, Chen SY, Guo HC (2004) An integrated feasibility study on designing remediation systems for petroleum contaminated sites. Water Air Soil Pollut 156:83–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mills MA, Bonner JS, Page CA, Autenrieth RL (2004) Evaluation of bioremediation strategies of a controlled oil release in a wetland. Mar Pollut Bull 49:425–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohajeri L, Aziz HA, Isa MH, Zahed MA (2010) A statistical experiment design approach for optimizing biodegradation of weathered crude oil in coastal sediments. Bioresour Technol 101:893–900

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC (2008) Design and analysis of experiments, 7th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mrayyana B, Battikhi MN (2005) Biodegradation of total organic carbons (TOC) in Jordanian petroleum sludge. J Hazard Mater 120:127–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roncevic S, Dalmacija B, Ivancev-Tumbas I, Trickovic J, Petrovic O, Klasnja M, Agbaba J (2005) Kinetics of degradation of hydrocarbons in the contaminated soil layer. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 49:27–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US-EPA (1991) Test methods for evaluating solid waste—SW 846. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • US-EPA (1999) Method 1664, revision A: N-hexane extractable material (hem; oil and grease) and silica gel treated N-hexane extractable material (SGT-HEM; non-polar material) by extraction and gravimetry. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • Venosa AD, Holder EL (2007) Biodegradability of dispersed crude oil at two different temperatures. Mar Pollut Bull 54:545–553

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira PA, Vieira RB, Faria S, Ribeiro EJ, Cardoso VL (2009) Biodegradation of diesel oil and gasoline contaminated effluent employing intermittent aeration. J Hazard Mater 168:1366–1372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zahed MA, Nabi Bidhendi G, Pardakhti A, Esmaili-Sari A, Mohajeri S (2009) Determination of polychlorinated biphenyl congeners in water and sediment in North West Persian Gulf, Iran. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 83:899–902

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zahed MA, Aziz HA, Isa MH, Mohajeri L (2010a) Effect of initial oil concentration and dispersant on crude oil biodegradation in contaminated seawater. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 84:438–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zahed MA, Aziz HA, Isa MH, Mohajeri L (2010b) Enhancement biodegradation of n-alkanes from crude oil contaminated seawater. Int J Environmental Research (in press)

  • Zhu X, Venosa AD, Suidan MT, Lee K (2001) Guidelines for the bioremediation of marine shorelines and freshwaters. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamidi Abdul Aziz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohajeri, L., Aziz, H.A., Isa, M.H. et al. Ex-situ Bioremediation of Crude Oil in Soil, a Comparative Kinetic Analysis. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 85, 54–58 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-010-0058-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-010-0058-1

Keywords

Navigation