Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Post-extubation noninvasive ventilation vs high-flow nasal cannula on reintubation in patients at very high risk for extubation failure. Author's reply

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Hsu NC, Liao C, Hsu CH (2023) Post-extubation noninvasive ventilation vs high-flow nasal cannula on reintubation in patients at very high risk for extubation failure. Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06963-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jha AK (2023) Postextubation ventilation strategy in preventing reintubation in patients at very high risk for extubation failure. Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-06979-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hernandez G, Paredes I, Colinas L et al (2022) Effect of postextubation noninvasive ventilation with active humidification vs high-flow nasal cannula on reintubation in patients at very high risk for extubation failure: a randomized trial. Intensive Care Med 48:1751–1759

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hernandez G, Vaquero C, Colinas L et al (2016) Effect of postextubation high-flow nasal cannula vs noninvasive ventilation on reintubation and postextubation respiratory failure in high-risk patients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 316(15):1565–1574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Critical Care Department, Hospital Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain

    Gonzalo Hernandez, Irene Paredes & Laura Colinas

  2. Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut de Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT), Sabadell, Spain

    Oriol Roca

  3. Ciber Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Health Institute Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

    Oriol Roca

Authors
  1. Gonzalo Hernandez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Irene Paredes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Laura Colinas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Oriol Roca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gonzalo Hernandez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

GH reported personal fees and travel expenses by Fisher & Paykel, and OR reported a research grant from Hamilton Medical AG and Fisher&Paykel Healthcare Ltd, speaker fees from Hamilton Medical AG, Fisher&Paykel Healthcare Ltd, Aerogen Ltd and Ambu Ltd, and non-financial research support from Timpel; all outside the submitted work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This comment refers to the article available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06919-3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hernandez, G., Paredes, I., Colinas, L. et al. Post-extubation noninvasive ventilation vs high-flow nasal cannula on reintubation in patients at very high risk for extubation failure. Author's reply. Intensive Care Med 49, 376–378 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-06984-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-06984-2

Search

Navigation