Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Proportion estimation in ranked set sampling in the presence of tie information

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ranked set sampling (RSS) is a statistical technique that uses auxiliary ranking information of unmeasured sample units in an attempt to select a more representative sample that provides better estimation of population parameters than simple random sampling. However, the use of RSS can be hampered by the fact that a complete ranking of units in each set must be specified when implementing RSS. Recently, to allow ties declared as needed, Frey (Environ Ecol Stat 19(3):309–326, 2012) proposed a modification of RSS, which is to simply break ties at random so that a standard ranked set sample is obtained, and meanwhile record the tie structure for use in estimation. Under this RSS variation, several mean estimators were developed and their performance was compared via simulation, with focus on continuous outcome variables. We extend the work of Frey (2012) to binary outcomes and investigate three nonparametric and three likelihood-based proportion estimators (with/without utilizing tie information), among which four are directly extended from existing estimators and the other two are novel. Under different tie-generating mechanisms, we compare the performance of these estimators and draw conclusions based on both simulation and a data example about breast cancer prevalence. Suggestions are made about the choice of the proportion estimator in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chen H, Stasny EA, Wolfe DA (2005) Ranked set sampling for efficient estimation of a population proportion. Stat Med 24:3319–3329

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Stasny EA, Wolfe DA (2007) Improved procedures for estimation of disease prevalence using ranked set sampling. Biom J 49(4):530–538

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Frey J (2012) Nonparametric mean estimation using partially ordered sets. Environ Ecol Stat 19(3):309–326

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Halls LK, Dell TR (1966) Trial of ranked-set sampling for forage yields. For Sci 12:22–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatefi A, Jafari Jozani M (2017) An improved procedure for estimation of malignant breast cancer prevalence using partially rank ordered set samples with multiple concomitants. Stat Methods Med Res 26(6):2552–2566

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Howard RW, Jones SC, Mauldin JK, Beal RH (1982) Abundance, distribution, and colony size estimates for Reticulitermes spp. (Isopter: Rhinotermitidae) in Southern Mississippi. Environ Entomol 11:1290–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvam PH (2003) Ranked set sampling based on binary water quality data with covariates. J Agri Biol Environ Stat 8:271–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichman M (2013) UCI machine learning repository. School of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml. Accessed 14 Feb 2018

  • MacEachern SN, Stasny EA, Wolfe DA (2004) Judgement post-stratification with imprecise rankings. Biometrics 60:207–215

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mahdizadeh M, Zamanzade E (2017) To appear in efficient body fat estimation using multistage pair ranked set sampling. Stat Methods Med Res. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280217720473

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre GA (1952) A method for unbiased selective sampling using ranked set sampling. Aust J Agric Res 3:385–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modarres R, Hui TP, Zheng G (2006) Resampling methods for ranked set samples. Comput Stat Data Anal 51(2):1039–1050

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mu X (2015) Log-concavity of a mixture of beta distributions. Stat Probab Lett 99:125–130

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum BD, Sinha BK (1997) Cost effective gasoline sampling using ranked set sampling. In: Proceedings of the section on statistics and the environment, pp 83–87. American Statistical Association

  • Ozturk O, Bilgin O, Wolfe DA (2005) Estimation of population mean and variance in flock management: a ranked set sampling approach in a finite population setting. J Stat Comput Simul 75:905–919

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra JF (2004) On estimating a population proportion via ranked set sampling. Biom J 46(2):264–272

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra JF, Liudahl LA (2004) Concomitant-based rank set sampling proportion estimates. Stat Med 23:2061–2070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra JF, Wang P (2008) Confidence intervals for a population proportion based on a ranked set sample. J Stat Comput Simul 78:351–366

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Lim J, Stokes L (2016) Using ranked set sampling with cluster randomized designs for improved inference on treatment effects. J Am Stat Assoc 111(516):1576–1590

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Johan Lim for his comments on an earlier version of this paper, Professor Jesse Frey for sharing his R-Code and the UCI machine learning repository for online data use. We are also thankful to two anonymous referees and an associate editor for their valuable comments which improved an earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ehsan Zamanzade.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 496 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zamanzade, E., Wang, X. Proportion estimation in ranked set sampling in the presence of tie information. Comput Stat 33, 1349–1366 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-018-0807-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-018-0807-x

Keywords

Navigation