Abstract
The diagnosis of osteoporosis is generally based on the assessment of bone mineral content with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) but does not account for the spatial distribution and inherent material properties of the tissue. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) permits one to measure the compartment-specific density and geometry-based parameters of cortical bone. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters are associated with material properties of cortical bone. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that pQCT and cortical QUS provide additional information to DXA in predicting structural strength of the distal radius. The intact right arm and the isolated left radius were harvested from 70 formalin-fixed cadavers (age 79±11 years). The bone mineral content (BMC) was assessed with DXA at the radial metaphysis and shaft. pQCT was also used at the metaphysis and the shaft, while QUS was employed only at the shaft. The failure loads of the radius were assessed by use of a 3-point bending test (isolated radius) and a complex fall simulation (intact arm). The BMC (DXA) displayed a correlation of r=0.96 with the failure moments in 3-point bending (P<0.001). The correlation between failure load and geometry-based parameters (pQCT) ranged from r=0.85 to r=0.96 and was r=0.64 for the speed of sound (QUS) (P <0.001). Cortical thickness (pQCT) improved the prediction marginally (r=0.964) in combination with DXA. For the fall simulation, the correlation coefficients were r=0.76 for BMC (DXA) of the shaft, r=0.83 for metaphyseal bone content (pQCT), r=0.55 for QUS, and ranged from r=0.59 to r=0.74 for geometry-based parameters at the shaft (pQCT). pQCT and QUS parameters provided no significant improvement versus DXA alone. Measurement of bone mass by DXA or pQCT thus appears to be sufficient as a surrogate of mechanical strength and fracture risk of the distal radius.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hayes WC, Bouxsein ML (1997) Biomechanics of cortical and trabecular bone: implications for assessment of fracture risk. In: Mow VC, Hayes WC (eds) Basic orthopaedic biomechanics, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 69–111
Guglielmi G, Schneider P, Lang TF, et al (1997) Quantitative computed tomography at the axial and peripheral skeleton. Eur Radiol 7:32–42
Groll O, Lochmuller EM, Bachmeier M, et al (1999) Precision and intersite correlation of bone densitometry at the radius, tibia and femur with peripheral quantitative CT. Skeletal Radiol 28:696–702
Lochmuller EM, Lill CA, Kuhn V, et al (2002) Radius bone strength in bending, compression, and falling and its correlation with clinical densitometry at multiple sites. J Bone Miner Res 17:1629–1638
Formica CA, Nieves JW, Cosman F, et al (1998) Comparative assessment of bone mineral measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Osteoporos Int 8:460–467
Augat P, Iida H, Jiang Y, et al (1998) Distal radius fractures: mechanisms of injury and strength prediction by bone mineral assessment. J Orthop Res 16:629–635
Barkmann R, Kantorovich E, Singal C, et al (2000) A new method for quantitative ultrasound measurements at multiple skeletal sites: first results of precision and fracture discrimination. J Clin Densitom 3:1–7
Gnudi S, Ripamonti C, Malavolta N (2000) Quantitative ultrasound and bone densitometry to evaluate the risk of nonspine fractures: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int 11:518–523
Hans D, Srivastav SK, Singal C, et al (1999) Does combining the results from multiple bone sites measured by a new quantitative ultrasound device improve discrimination of hip fracture? J Bone Miner Res 14:644–651
Pithioux M, Lasaygues P, Chabrand P (2002) An alternative ultrasonic method for measuring the elastic properties of cortical bone. J Biomech 35:961–968
Pöpperl G, Lochmüller EM, Becker H, et al (1999) Determination of calcaneal ultrasound properties ex situ: reproducibility, effects of storage, formalin fixation, maceration, and changes in anatomic measurement site. Calcif Tissue Int 65:192–197
Prevrhal S, Fuerst T, Fan B, et al (2001) Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia depends on both cortical density and thickness. Osteoporos Int 12:28–34
Sievanen H, Cheng S, Ollikainen S, et al (2001) Ultrasound velocity and cortical bone characteristics in vivo. Osteoporos Int 12:399–405
van den Bergh JP, van Lenthe GH, Hermus AR, et al (2000) Speed of sound reflects Young’s modulus as assessed by microstructural finite element analysis. Bone 26:519–524
Wu C, Hans D, He Y, et al (2000) Prediction of bone strength of distal forearm using radius bone mineral density and phalangeal speed of sound. Bone 26:529–533
Miller PD, Siris ES, Barrett-Connor E, et al (2002) Prediction of fracture risk in postmenopausal white women with peripheral bone densitometry: evidence from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment. J Bone Miner Res 17:2222–2230
Cuddihy MT, Gabriel SE, Crowson CS, et al (1999) Forearm fractures as predictors of subsequent osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 9:469–475
Huiskes R (2000) If bone is the answer, then what is the question? J Anat 197:145–156
Lill CA, Goldhahn J, Albrecht A, et al (2003) Impact of bone density on distal radius fracture patterns and comparison between five different fracture classifications. J Orthop Trauma 17:271–278
Lochmüller EM, Krefting N, Bürklein D, et al (2001) Effect of fixation, soft-tissues, and scan projection on bone mineral measurements with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Calcif Tissue Int 68:140–145
Muller ME, Webber CE, Bouxsein ML (2003) Predicting the failure load of the distal radius. Osteoporos Int 14:345–352
Edmondston SJ, Singer KP, Day RE, et al (1994) Formalin fixation effects on vertebral bone density and failure mechanics: an in vitro study of human and sheep vertebrae. Clin Biomech 9:175–179
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Stratec Medizintechnik (Pforzheim, Germany) for providing the XCT 2000 pQCT scanner and Sunlight Medical GmbH, Europe (Ravensburg, Germany) for providing the Omnisense ultrasound system (Omnisense 7000). Gudrun Goldmann is to be thanked for her help with the ultrasound and DXA measurements and Dr. Stephan Metz for his help with obtaining the radiographs of the forearms after mechanical testing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
M. Hudelmaier and V. Kuhn contributed equally to this study
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hudelmaier, M., Kuhn, V., Lochmüller, E.M. et al. Can geometry-based parameters from pQCT and material parameters from quantitative ultrasound (QUS) improve the prediction of radial bone strength over that by bone mass (DXA)?. Osteoporos Int 15, 375–381 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1551-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1551-8