Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Knowledge about osteoporosis in a cohort of Polish females: the influence of age, level of education and personal experiences

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a group of 1065 women aged 16–72 years recruited from patients attending general practitioners was studied to investigate knowledge of osteoporosis and attitude towards methods of preventing the disease. The interviews were carried out by students of the Silesian School of Medicine, using a structured questionnaire. The average number of correct answers in the whole population was 7.05, and in women with established osteoporosis 6.89. In the whole population, the majority of answers were correct and ranged from 60% to 95% in seven out of ten questions. The answers for three questions were incorrect in about half or more of the cohort: 53% of subjects considered that osteoporosis could be cured; for 50% of women osteoporosis is a minor health problem (except for the youngest women and women with university education—74% and 69% of correct answers, respectively); and 58% of women considered that those with osteoporosis should not engage in physical activity due to the risk of falling and causing a fracture. A simple chi-squared test was used to show the role of age, level of education and personal experiences with osteoporosis on answers given by the subjects studied. Age (six out of ten answers), level of education (seven out of ten answers) and personal experience (four out of ten answers) significantly affected answers given. The number of correct answers decreased with age and increased with level of education, and there was no systematic influence of personal experience. In summary, data collected provide important information about knowledge of osteoporosis. Generally, the level of knowledge about osteoporosis was high. Higher level of education and younger age improve the knowledge of osteoporosis with no systematic influence of personal experience with the disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Magnus JH, Joakimsen RM, Berntsen GK, Tollan A, Sogaard AJ (1996) What do Norwegian women and men know about osteoporosis? Osteoporos Int 6:31–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pal B (1999) Questionnaire survey of advice given to patients with fractures. BMJ 318:500–501

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rozenberg S, Twagirayezu P, Paesmans M, Ham H (1999) Perception of osteoporosis by Belgian women who work in a university hospital. Osteoporos Int 10:312–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Phillipov G, Phillips PJ, Leach G, Taylor AW (1998) Public perceptions and self-report prevalence of osteoporosis in South Australia. Osteoporos Int 8:552–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Juby AG, Davis P (2001) A prospective evaluation of the awareness, knowledge, risk factors and current treatment of osteoporosis in a cohort of elderly subjects. Osteoporos Int 12:617–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Meunier PJ, Delmas PD, Eastell R et al. (1999) Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: clinical guidelines. Clin Ther 21:1025–1044

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Kalina Góra, Łukasz Talarek and Andrzej Kupilas, students of the School of Medicine in Katowice, for help in collecting the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Drozdzowska.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Drozdzowska, B., Pluskiewicz, W. & Skiba, M. Knowledge about osteoporosis in a cohort of Polish females: the influence of age, level of education and personal experiences. Osteoporos Int 15, 645–648 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1581-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1581-2

Keywords

Navigation