Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Direct costs of osteoporosis and hip fracture: an analysis for the Mexican healthcare system

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

This study reports the direct costs related to osteoporosis and hip fractures paid for governmental and private institutions in the Mexican health system and estimates the impact of these entities on Mexico. We conclude that the economic burden due to the direct costs of hip fracture justifies wide-scale prevention programs for osteoporosis (OP).

Methods

To estimate the total direct costs of OP and hip fractures in the Mexican Health care system, a sample of governmental and private institutions were studied. Information was gathered through direct questionnaires in 275 OP patients and 218 hip fracture cases. Additionally, a chart review was conducted and experts’ opinions obtained to get accurate protocol scenarios for diagnoses and treatment of OP with no fracture. Microcosting and activity-based costing techniques were used to yield unit costs.

Results

The total direct costs for OP and hip fracture were estimated for 2006 based on the projected annual incidence of hip fractures in Mexico. A total of 22,233 hip fracture cases were estimated for 2006 with a total cost to the healthcare system of US$ 97,058,159 for the acute treatment alone ($4,365.50 per case). We found considerable differences in costs and the way the patients were treated across the different health sectors within the country.

Conclusion

Costs of the acute treatment of hip fractures in Mexico are high and are expected to increase with the predicted increment of life expectancy and the number of elderly in our population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. US Bone Health and Osteoporosis: a report of the Surgeon General, M.U.a.H.D.o.H.S. Rockville, Office of the Surgeon General, Editor. 2004, US Department of Health and Human Services

  2. Bagur A, Mautalen C, Rubin Z (1994) Epidemiology of hip fractures in an urban population of central Argentina. Osteoporos Int 4(6):332–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Clark P et al (2004) Prevalence of vertebral fractures in Brazil, Puerto Rico and Mexico. Preliminary report of the Latin American Vertebral Osteoporosis Study LAVOS. J Bone Miner Res 19 [Suppl 1]:S87

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clark P et al (2005) Incidence rates and life-time risk of hip fractures in Mexicans over 50 years of age: a population-based study. Osteoporos Int 16(12):2025–2030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kanis JA (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group. Osteoporos Int 4(6):368–381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clark P et al (2006) The prevalence of low bone mineral density in a random sample of Mexican women and men 50 years and older. A population study. J Clin Densitom 9(2):234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cruz Gonzalez I et al (2002) Costos institucionales y dificultades en la atención de los pacientes con fracturas por osteoporosis. Acta Ortop Mex 16(6):292–295

    Google Scholar 

  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2003) Trends in aging—United States and worldwide MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 52(6):101–104, 106

    Google Scholar 

  9. CONAPO, INEGI y COLMEX. Conciliacion demografica 2000–2005

  10. Barraza-Llorens M et al (2002) Addressing inequity in health and health care in Mexico. Health Aff (Millwood) 21(3):47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. INEGI, Instituto Nacional de Estadistica Geografia e Informática, 2006

  12. http://transparencia.imss.gob.mx.

  13. Proyecciones de la poblacion Mexicana 2000–2050. Prospectiva demografica, in ISBN 970-628-671-3, C.N.d. Poblacion, Editor, 2002

  14. Reginster JY et al (1999) Direct costs of hip fractures in patients over 60 years of age in Belgium. Pharmacoeconomics 15(5):507–514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schurch MA et al (1996) A prospective study on socioeconomic aspects of fracture of the proximal femur. J Bone Miner Res 11(12):1935–1942

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lippuner K, Golder M, Greiner R (2005) Epidemiology and direct medical costs of osteoporotic fractures in men and women in Switzerland. Osteoporos Int 16 [Suppl 2]:S8–S17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wong MK et al (2002) Osteoporotic hip fractures in Singapore—costs and patient’s outcome. Ann Acad Med Singap 31(1):3–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Johnell O et al (2005) The burden of hospitalised fractures in Sweden. Osteoporos Int 16(2):222–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Johnell O, Kanis JA (2004) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence, mortality and disability associated with hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 15(11):897–902

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cooper C (1999) Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2:S2–S8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Drs. Luis Guillermo Ibarra, Director General of the National Institute of Rehabilitation SS, Dr. Erick J. Hazan Larsi, Dr. José M. Aguilera Zepeda, and Dr. Pilar Diez Garcia, National Institute of Rehabilitation, Dr. Miriam America Ruiz Esparza, Head of the Osteoporosis Clinic at Centro Medico la Raza, IMSS, and Dr. Alejandro Rios Leal, Head of Hip Surgery from Angeles Mocel for their considerable support in carrying out this study. This study was supported by a grant from CONACYT Sectorial-076, FOFOI, IMSS 2003/33, and a small grant from the International Clinical Epidemiology Network (INCLEN).

Conflict of interest disclosure

Dr. Tugwell organizes a biannual outcome measures consensus meeting - OMERACT (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology)- which has received financial support from: 3-M Pharma, Abbott, Abgenix, Actelion, Alderbio, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Anergen, Apple Centerpoint Maastricht, Astellas, Astra, Astra Zeneca, Aventis, Bayer Corp., Bio-Magnetic Therapy Systems, Boehringer Ingleheim, Boots UK, Bristol Myers Squibb, Burroughs Wellcome, Celltech, Centacor Inc., Ciba Geigy, Combinatorx, Cypress, Dupont, Eli Lilly, Forest Labs, Genelabs Tech, Genentech, Genzyme, Hoechst Marion Roussel, Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., Hologic, IDEC Pharmaceuticals, Immune Response Corp., Immunex, Kabi Pharmacia, Knoll AG, Laboratoires OM, LaJolla Pharmaceutical, Merck, Merck Frosst, Noric Merrell Dow, Novartis, Organon, Ortho-Mcneil Inc., Pfizer, Pharmacia and Upjohn, Pierre Fabre, Procter & Gamble, Purdue Frederick, R.W. Johnson Pharmaceutical, Regeneron, Roche, Roussel UCLAF, Salazopyrin Pharmacia, Sandoz Pharma Ltd., Sanofi Winthrop, Savient, Scarle, Seragen, Smithkline Beecham, Synergen Inc., Syntex Laboratories, Targeted Genetics, Takeda, Wyeth-Ayerst, and Zoma.

Dr. Tugwell has acted as a paid consultant for: Abbott, Almirall, Astra Zeneca, Aventis, Berlex, Biomatrix, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cadeuceus Group, Canadian Coordinating Office for HTA, Canadian Medical Association, Centocor, Dimedix, Dimethaid, Eli Lilly, Glaxo Smith Kline, Glaxo-Welcome, Hoechst Marion Roussel, Innovus, Johnson & Johnson, Lilly Research, Medicine Group, Medicus, Merck, Merck Frosst, Novartis, Novopharm, Ortho Mcneil, Pennsido, Roche, Sandoz, Selos, Searle, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and Wyeth Ayerst.

Dr. Tugwell and his staff have worked on grants supported by: Arthritis Society of Canada, Aventis (HMR), Biomatrix, Canadian Institute of Health Research, Canadian International Development Agency, CIGNA, Council on Health Research and Development, Genzyme, IDRC, Medical Research Council of Canada, Merck, Novartis, Parke Davis, Pfizer, Physiotherapy Foundation of Canada, Rhone-Poulenc, Royal College of Physicians & Surgeons, Sandoz Pharmaceuticals, and Smithkline Beecham.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Clark.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clark, P., Carlos, F., Barrera, C. et al. Direct costs of osteoporosis and hip fracture: an analysis for the Mexican healthcare system. Osteoporos Int 19, 269–276 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-007-0496-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-007-0496-8

Keywords

Navigation